Skip to main content

25 Times… That’s How Often America Has Threatened to Use Its Nukes

A robber decides to do something big to lay a claim to his turf. He goes to two bars owned by a rival with an AR-15 and not only robs the bars, but kills scores of customers. 

Over the years, the gangster goes around to more than 20 other bars carrying his AR-15. He merely has to point his weapon to make people hand over the money. While he hasn’t had to spray the bars with gunfire, he has certainly used both the gun and his “rep” to carry out his crimes. 

As the gangster gets older, new rivals come up to challenge him. The gangster moves to put them in their place. He takes an even more powerful gun with him. But these rivals are desperate as well—and the question arises:

What happens the next time? Will the rivals again give in? Or will there be an all-out fight?

*****

How many times has the U.S. threatened to use nuclear weapons in the time since it actually did drop two atomic bombs on Japan in World War 2? Once? Twice? Five times? The U.S. has kept the actual number—and the threats it has made—a deep state secret. 

In his book, The Doomsday Machine, Daniel Ellsberg1 wrote about his work in the 1950s and 1960s inside the U.S. nuclear war planning apparatus. Ellsberg broke with that and devoted the rest of his life to eliminating nuclear weapons and other horrors.2 In his decades of study, Ellsberg unearthed evidence that the United States has threatened to use nuclear weapons more than 25 times in the period since WW 2. 

Ellsberg made the point: if you have a gun, which is loaded, and you are in a confrontation with someone and you point the gun at them, you are using the gun—even if you don’t end up shooting it. 

“We, the people of the world, can no longer afford to allow these imperialists to continue to dominate the world and determine the destiny of humanity. They need to be overthrown as quickly as possible. And it is a scientific fact that we do not have to live this way.”

—Bob Avakian, The Bob Avakian Interviews 

Ellsberg detailed how the U.S. did this over and over again with nuclear weapons—for many decades—starting with actually dropping two atomic bombs on Japan at the end of WW2. 

  • In the early 1950s, during the U.S.-led war in Korea in 1950-53, U.S. President Harry Truman threatened nuclear attack against socialist China, which was defeating the U.S. military for a time during the Korean War.3 
  • In 1954-55, there was a secret agreement at the highest level of the U.S. government to use nuclear weapons, if necessary, against revolutionary China in what was known as the Quemoy crisis. This was communicated to China. 
  • During the U.S. war in Vietnam, the U.S. repeatedly threatened to use nuclear weapons against the forces fighting for national liberation in Vietnam. Ellsberg reports on a conversation with a member of the North Vietnamese delegation to peace talks to end the Vietnam war, who reported that the U.S. had threatened to use nuclear weapons against Vietnam 13 times, none of them publicly known at the time. (And Ellsberg counts the 13 threats against Vietnam as only one of the 25 times that the U.S. has threatened the use of these weapons that could destroy humanity.)
  • The U.S. threatened the Soviet Union with nuclear weapons many times over decades. One example: the U.S. issued explicit, secret nuclear warnings to the Soviet Union, telling it to stay out of Iran in 1980 (there was a Soviet military buildup on its border with Iran). 
  • The George H. W. Bush administration issued formal nuclear threats against Iraq in 1991.4

Ellsberg also shows how the U.S. threatened the use of nuclear weapons in many other crises. And we see this right up to the war in Ukraine in the present day. In 2022, Russia’s threats to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine were all over the news, repeatedly, and these threats were themselves a crime. But barely covered at all was the fact that in response, the U.S. rushed upgraded nuclear bombs to Europe5—a form of threat to use them. 

What Happens When Someone Calls the Bet?

As we noted in our opening parable—the threat to use nuclear weapons, even so-called tactical nuclear weapons,6 risks that those being threatened—or their allies—will refuse to back down. Instead, they will themselves choose to “get the jump” and respond with nuclear weapons, which could escalate into all-out nuclear war. 

Yet this is what the U.S. has done, 25 times. Think about that the next time they label someone else “a monster.” 

Ellsberg further pointed out that every U.S. president since Harry Truman, who ordered the atomic bombs dropped on Japan in WW 2, has carried out the policy of being willing to initiate first use of nuclear weapons.7 And every U.S. president since Truman has continued to uphold the nuclear destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which killed over two hundred thousand people, overwhelmingly civilians.

Hiroshima destruction after U.S. dropped atomic bomb, August 1945.

 

Hiroshima, August 6, 1945.    Photo: AP

“All Options Are on the Table”—A Monstrous Phrase Used by Monsters

When the U.S. was threatening to attack Iran when George W. Bush was president, and Bush was asked about using nuclear weapons against Iran, he responded that “all options are on the table”—an explicit threat that the U.S. might strike Iran with nuclear weapons. Ellsberg commented that shortly after, in the 2008 presidential campaign, this same phrase was used by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Rudolph Giuliani, Mitt Romney, John McCain, and other lesser-known candidates. These repeated statements were in and of themselves a criminal nuclear threat to Iran—and they also reveal that one of the requirements to be a U.S. president is to be willing and able to issue that threat—and to make that threat real.

This is a time when all these monsters—in the U.S., China, Russia, western Europe, etc.—are “modernizing” and expanding their nuclear arsenals, practicing nuclear war games and, in the case of the U.S. and Russia, actually participating in a war carrying the grave threat of “going nuclear.” At such a time, the alarm has to be much more loudly sounded and the only solution to this madness—revolution, here and all over the world—much more powerfully fought for. 

The Monsters Who Run America 

This is an excerpt from an April 25, 1972, tape of White House conversations between then-president Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, his national security advisor. They were discussing U.S. options in response to advances against U.S. forces in the war of national liberation in Vietnam. The discussion begins with talk of bombing the dikes in North Vietnam, which would have flooded vast areas, disrupted the food supply and killed many people (from Ellsberg’s book, The Doomsday Machine):

PRESIDENT: I still think we ought to take the dikes out now. Will that drown people?

HENRY KISSINGER: About two hundred thousand people.

PRESIDENT [reflective, matter-of-fact]: No, no, no… I’d rather use the nuclear bomb. Have you got that Henry?

HENRY KISSINGER [like the president, low-key]: That, I think would just be too much.

PRESIDENT [in a tone of surprise]: The nuclear bomb, does that bother you? I just want you to think big, Henry, for Christsakes.

Abolishing Nuclear Weapons, Finally Abolishing War, and Systematically Addressing the Environmental Crisis

The new socialist government will not develop or use nuclear weapons and will take concrete steps and wage determined struggle to abolish nuclear weapons everywhere, with the ultimate goal of finally abolishing wars among human beings, with the abolition of the capitalist-imperialist system, and all systems and relations of exploitation and oppression, which are the basis for wars. This new socialist government will move, quickly, systematically and effectively, to address the already acute and fast accelerating environmental crisis, with the aim of bringing into being a world where humanity can truly be fit caretakers of the earth.

From We Need and We Demand: A Whole New Way to Live, A Fundamentally Different System

rectangle homepage banner We Need We Demand

 

_______________

FOOTNOTES:

1. Ellsberg died last year. In the 1960s, he was working inside think tanks and government agencies that were involved with both nuclear war plans and the war in Vietnam. During the Vietnam war, he courageously brought to the public secret documents that showed the U.S. government had been lying about Vietnam, risking many years in prison. [back]

2. See “U.S. Imperialism’s Depraved and Insane Buildup for Nuclear War: One More Urgent Reason We Need Revolution!” on the massive revamping and strengthening of the U.S. (and Russian and Chinese) nuclear arsenals, and the grave danger that poses to humanity, even the possible end of human beings on planet earth, and the urgent need for revolution to get rid of the system that has spawned this grave danger. [back]

3. See: American Crime Case #49: 1950-53—Encircling, Threatening and Attacking the Chinese Revolution For background on the Korean War, see American Crime Case #93: U.S. Invasion of Korea—1950 (on the U.S. bombing campaign against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea [North Korea]). [back]

4. American Crime Case #32: The 1991 Persian Gulf War — “Operation Desert Storm” [back]

5. POLITICO noted in 2022, “The fielding of an improved gravity bomb has been moved up to December as Vladimir Putin threatens the region.”  [back]

6. Nuclear powers have in their arsenal “strategic” nuclear weapons, which are built to cause the complete destruction of the rival power in one blow. For the U.S., these include intercontinental ballistic missiles, long-range bomber fleets, and nuclear submarines. “Tactical” nuclear weapons are usually less powerful and are built to be used in the confrontations with not only nuclear-armed rivals, but lesser powers and movements for revolution.  [back]

7. The U.S. has explicitly refused to change its policy of “first use” of nuclear weapons, and has rejected calls from many countries in the world to pledge NOT to use nuclear weapons first. [back]

DONATE to revcom.us
DONATE to the revolution.

From the genocide in Gaza, to the growing threat of world war between nuclear powers, to escalating environmental devastation… the capitalist-imperialist system ruling over us is a horror for billions around the world and is tearing up the fabric of life on earth. Now the all-out battle within the U.S. ruling class, between fascist Republicans and war criminal Democrats, is coming to a head—likely during, or before, the coming elections—ripping society apart unlike anything since the Civil War. 

Bob Avakian (BA), revolutionary leader and author of the new communism, has developed a strategy to prepare for and make revolution. He’s scientifically analyzed that this is a rare time when an actual revolution has become more possible, and has laid out the sweeping vision, solid foundation and concrete blueprint for “what comes next,” in the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America

The website revcom.us follows and applies that leadership and is essential to all this. We post new materials from BA and curate his whole body of work. We apply the science he’s developed to analyze and expose every key event in society, every week. Revcom.us posts BA’s timely leadership for the revcoms (revolutionary communists), including his social media posts which break this down for people every week and sometimes more. We act as a guiding and connecting hub for the growing revcom movement nationwide: not just showing what’s being done, but going into what’s right and what’s wrong and rapidly learning—and recruiting new people into what has to be a rapidly growing force.

Put it this way: there will be no revolution unless this website not only “keeps going” but goes up to a whole different level!

So what should you give to make 2024 our year—a year of revolution? 
Everything you possibly can! 
DONATE NOW to revcom.us and get with BA and the revcoms!    

Your donations contribute to:

  • Promotion of BA on social media and the Bob Avakian Interviews on The RNL—Revolution, Nothing Less!—Show 
  • Strengthen revcom.us as an accessible, secure, robust website able to rise to the challenge of meeting the extraordinary demands of navigating the storms and preparing for revolution in this pivotal, unprecedented year
  • Fund revcoms to travel to national “hotspots,” where extreme contradictions are pulling apart the fabric of this country and creating the possibility of wrenching an actual revolution out of this intensifying situation
  • Expand the reach and coverage of revcom.us
  • Printing and distribution of key Revcom materials including the Declaration and Proclamation