Skip to main content

Posts by issue number/Posteos por número de la edición

 

Articles in this issue (scroll down or click to read article below):

  • 85 Down, I Still Have 15 to Go... but Trump Has to Go Now

    A note from C. Clark Kissinger, on the occasion of his 85th birthday

  • Minnesota: Struggle Sharpens at the Top and Surges from Below—The High Stakes and What We Must Do
  • Trump's Global Rampage, and the Method to the Madness
  • Why Trump Says Greenland Is Essential for American Strategic Interests
  • From RefuseFascism.org:

    The People’s Indictment of Donald Trump: A Unified Declaration of Illegitimacy
  • Iran’s Islamic Republic Slaughters Thousands of People Righteously Standing UpNow Is Not the Time to Choose Between Oppressors
  • From the International Emergency Campaign to Free Iran’s Political Prisoners Now

    Fight to Stand with Iran’s Prisoners in Grave Danger Amid Reported Massacre of Protesters 
  • From Atash/Fire, Communist Party of Iran, Marxist-Leninist-Maoist

    The Islamic Republic Must Go!
  • The Lie of Trump’s Gaza Ceasefire

    Genocidal Slaughter, Blockades and Gaza Concentration Camps

  • Some Crucial Points of Revolutionary Orientation — in Opposition to Infantile Posturing and Distortions of Revolution
  • Digging into the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, by Bob Avakian

    How Would the Revolution Deal with Relations with Other Countries?
  • Digging into the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, by Bob Avakian

    How Would the Revolution Deal with Relations with Other Countries? 

    Part II: Putting the New Economy on an Internationalist Basis

  • Dreams in Dark TimesA Benefit for The Bob Avakian Institute
  • In These Historic TimesDonate to Maintain a Robust Revcom.us!

    $20,000 needed by March 1, 2026

  • Trump Declares Full Control of VenezuelaThis Fascist Imperialist Gangster Must Be StoppedA Better World Is Possible—And Needs to Be Fought For
  • Stephen Miller says immigrants come from—and must return to—“broken homelands”… but the REAL question is:

    Who Broke Those “Homelands”? And What Does That Tell Us About the Fascists Who Now Rule This One?
  • From Revolutionary Communist Group, Colombia:

    U.S. Out of Venezuela! The Imperialists Are Not the Solution, They Are the Problem!
  • Urgent Warning: People Need to Know About and Come Together to Defeat the Fascist Repression Ahead
  • Warning for the Decent People Who Oppose Trump/MAGA Fascism: Don't Fall for Dishonest Divide-and-Conquer Schemes

    The Revcoms reply to Kristofer Goldsmith’s lies about Refuse Fascism, the Revcoms and the Revolutionary Leader Bob Avakian

  • In the 1960s, the Government Spread Lies to Foment Violent Conflict Within the MovementThe Lessons of That Time Need to Be Learned Anew Today
  • “Don’t Talk”—A Fundamental Principle for Resisting Repression and Defending the Rights of the People 
  • U.S. CONSTITUTION: AN EXPLOITERS’ VISION OF FREEDOM—ADDED NOTES (AND BRIEF INTRODUCTION)
  • Readers’ Corner
  • Update on Trump's Global Rampage: Escalating Threats on Greenland and the Danger of Nuclear War 
  • ARTICLE:

    85 Down, I Still Have 15 to Go... but Trump Has to Go Now

    A note from C. Clark Kissinger, on the occasion of his 85th birthday

    Clark Kissinger

     

    C. CLARK KISSINGER has been a prominent organizer, activist, writer, and speaker since the early 1960s. In the early ’60s, Clark was national secretary of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), and he organized the first March on Washington to End the War in Vietnam (1965). He is a revolutionary communist and advocate for the new communism developed by the revolutionary leader Bob Avakian.   

    During my now 65 years as a political activist, I have witnessed many things, three of which I want to single out as being of lasting significance. My appreciation of each of them today comes not so much from my “having been there,” but from an understanding of their significance gained over time, with the help and input of many comrades and friends.

    1. THE SIXTIES

    There is a mistaken impression that “the sixties” was an American phenomenon. What we now call “the sixties,” was actually a global upsurge of resistance and revolution extending from the late fifties through the mid-seventies. It embraced both rebellions in the advanced capitalist countries as well as socialist and anti-colonial revolutions in the Third World. 1968 alone was a year of global rebellion much like 1848. It saw the student-worker revolt in France, the Tet Offensive in Vietnam, the explosion of the Cultural Revolution in China, the massacre of student demonstrators in Mexico, the popular resistance to the Russian invasion of Czechoslovakia, the birth of the Palestinian resistance at the battle of Karameh, the Naxalite rebellion in India, martial law declared in Uruguay in response to the Tupamaros, as well as the urban uprisings in the U.S. following the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. and the growth of the Black Panther Party. (See my chronology of 1968 posted on www.dissident.info.)

    Chicano Moratorium march against war in Vietnam, 1970.

     

    The 1970 Chicano Moratorium was an expression of resistance and defiance against the U.S. war in Vietnam.   

    What is important to take away from the particular experience in the U.S. is what a growing revolutionary situation can look like. It is commonplace for people who were not there, or for people who were there but have been “recouped” by the ruling class, to sneer at how foolish people must have been to think that there could have been a revolution. Really? Let's take a look.

    The first ingredient of a revolutionary situation is a severe crisis in the ruling class that causes it to split and not be able to rule in the old ways. Such a political crisis does not necessarily arise from an economic crisis. In fact, the period of so much intense upsurge in the sixties, during which the ruling class was very much thrown on the defensive politically, coincided with the peak economic power of the U.S. globally.

    Black GI throws back his medal at the Capitol during Dewey Canyon III

     

    Black GI throws back his medal at the Capitol during Dewey Canyon III, 1971.   

    What did happen was that masses of people threw off their superstitious awe of the state and seized the political initiative away from the ruling class. People labeled the police as pigs. Soldiers in Vietnam refused to obey orders and rolled hand grenades into the tents of officers who were too gung-ho. Students burned down dozens of ROTC buildings. Women flat-out rejected the institutions of patriarchy. There were massive urban revolts in the U.S. and a growing Black liberation movement. The state had lost legitimacy in the eyes of millions.

    One result was a furious debate within the ruling class over how to handle the situation and regain control. Should there be a repressive clamp-down or should people be bought off with temporary concessions? The intensity of the struggle eventually led to a situation where both the president and vice president were forced to resign and the country had a president and a vice president who were appointed, not elected. That's what a crisis in the ruling class can look like. (For light entertainment, I recommend people read former Vice President Spiro Agnew's memoir Go Quietly... or Else.)

    The second requirement of a revolutionary situation is a revolutionary-minded people. They don’t have to be a majority, but they do have to be a significant force. In the ’60s there was a great awakening to the reality that the “American Dream” was actually an American nightmare for so many people here and around the world. While there was no deep understanding of what an actual revolution would require, literally millions of people came to believe that the existing system was hopelessly flawed and what was required was a “revolution.” Far from being a social stigma, there was a great deal of approbation for people who called themselves revolutionaries.

    People also began to act on their new self-identity. It was immoral to remain a passive observer. Demonstrations in Washington became so militant that the Nixon administration took to surrounding the White House with a wall of buses for fear that people would storm the seat of executive power. The call to shut Washington down in May of 1971 resulted in such an outpouring that the Army was called in to defend the capital and over 12,000 people were arrested—the largest mass arrest in U.S. history.

    But while we at least had a start on the first two requirements of a revolutionary situation, what we did not have was the third ingredient: a revolutionary party with the determination, the understanding, the plan, the leadership, the organization among the people, and the program for a post-revolutionary society that could both galvanize and lead a successful seizure of power. Even the most advanced force in that time, the Black Panther Party, never sat down and seriously addressed the question of what it would take to actually overthrow the state and lead a new revolutionary society.

    2. THE GREAT PROLETARIAN CULTURAL REVOLUTION

    Few people today are familiar with even the outlines of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution (GPCR), and it is probably the single most lied about event in world history. It was an amazing ten-year mass upsurge in China led by Mao Zedong to break the power of the entrenched revisionist “communists” who wanted to follow the path of the Soviet Union, a path that would—and ultimately did—lead to the restoration of capitalism. 

    It was my privilege to have visited China twice during the latter half of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. As with the sixties, my understanding of what happened in this momentous world event comes more from study after the fact and from the insights of others, than from my own personal observations. That said, it was still amazing to see with my own eyes!

    While books and films on the GPCR correctly focus on the demonstrations, mass meetings and “big character posters” that were at the heart of the struggle for power, one aspect of the GPCR that is little recognized is that it produced the most massive political education program in human history. At each point, the entire country was mobilized to read and discuss the same major theoretical work. When I was there in 1972, people were studying Anti-Dühring by Engels and in 1975 it was Marx's Critique of the Gotha Program. At one point I kind of naively asked if they really had enough copies of Anti-Dühring for everyone to read. I was told in a rather matter-of-fact way that the state publishing house had just run off another 50 million copies. Now that's taking study seriously!

    Handing out leaflets during January Storm, China.

     

    In Shanghai, the revolutionary workers, with Maoist leadership, were able to unite broad sections of the city’s population. This was called the January Storm.   

    Another often forgotten aspect of the GPCR that impressed me so much were the “socialist new things.” I wrote about these at the time. These were experiments from below in forging new social and economic relations at a local level that presaged what a future communist society might look like. There were places where local communities consciously turned what had been commodities into social services. The use of these services was no longer linked to or exchanged for money earned by the recipients of those services. People used what they needed and contributed to the common weal in other ways. 

    In 1972, I visited a small village near the Daqing oil field in Manchuria. In this village, the women all worked—but in different sectors of the socialist economy. Some women worked in the fields as part of the local agricultural commune. They were paid mostly “in kind” from the crops. Some other women worked in a small local co-op factory that manufactured tacks. These women were paid from the money received from selling their tacks to the state. Finally, some women had jobs in the oil field and were paid cash wages directly by the state.

    The interesting fact here is that all the women worked hard, yet they received quite different incomes that were based on the differing economic productivity of their labor. The women who worked in the fields had the lowest income. The women from the tack factory were in the middle. The women who worked in the oil field made the most, because the productivity of the state-owned oil field was the highest.

    China, during Cultural Revolution: People gathering to discuss a "big-character poster."

     

    People gathering to discuss a "big-character poster," a popular means of political expression and protest during the Cultural Revolution in China, contributing to the atmosphere of broad debate over policy and direction of society.   

    The women in the village were all involved in studying Marx and they were wrestling with a theoretical question: They understood why some of them made more money than others. But did it have to stay this way? They didn’t think so. So, they decided to pool their incomes from the three different sources and divide the money more evenly. This was a startling break with the laws of exchange in a market-based economy. It was, in fact, revolutionary! It was a step toward communism, made by people consciously breaking with the concepts of “cash value” and private ownership as natural and inevitable.

    In the end, the socialist transition to communism was defeated in both the Soviet Union and in China; capitalism was restored. “Living labor” was once again subordinated to “dead labor” (capital as accumulated labor). The slogan “Serve the People” was replaced with the slogan “To get rich is glorious.” The great lessons learned under the leadership of Mao were that the revolutionary seizure of power is only the beginning, not the final goal, and that you cannot “produce your way to communism” by increasing the level of material abundance. The period of socialist transition is much more characterized by intense class struggle over changing economic and social relations that requires a leading core that is consciously striving for a classless society. 

    3. THE BIRTH OF THE NEW COMMUNISM OF BOB AVAKIAN

    The most important and lasting thing to come from the sixties is the new communism of Bob Avakian. Avakian is the architect of a new framework for human emancipation and is, without question, the Karl Marx of our time.

    The defeat of socialism in the Soviet Union and China presented a big issue to “sixties people.” But Avakian refused to accept the triumphalist conclusions of the propagandists for capitalism. He has now spent over 50 years investigating what actually happened and has upheld the tremendous achievements of the Russian and Chinese revolutions. But he then dug into not only what was done right, but why mistakes (some of them quite grave) were made. With what method and approach did the leaders of these revolutionary societies address the freedoms and necessities they confronted? And how might we today do it differently and far better?

    I will try to lay out what I see as some of Avakian’s important conclusions and insights, but no one should take my observations as “authoritative” and they certainly do not replace the need to actually read Avakian’s basic works.

    The New Communism

     

    What Avakian highlights is the failure to be thoroughly scientific; scientific meaning to bring one’s ideas into correlation with reality and not wishful thinking. Too often, 20th century communism (the “old communism”) fell into an almost religious approach, substituting belief for reality. One striking example was the teleological claim that communism is inevitable. Communism is NOT inevitable; it is possible, there is a material basis for it, but it is not inevitable.

    I think what has impressed me the most in Avakian’s work is his new conception of socialism. Too many people today think of a socialist state as one with a “mixed economy” in which capitalism is restrained by the power of representative democracy while the state guarantees a basic standard of living and medical care for all.

    By contrast, Avakian has built on Marx’s concept of socialism as a period of transition in which the class dictatorship of the capitalist class is replaced by the class dictatorship of propertyless working people and their allies. The conscious goals of this transition are an economy governed by social needs rather than by a commodity market, and an end to the necessity for one section of society to hold institutionalized power over the rest.

    Another way of characterizing these goals was stated by Marx:  the abolition of all class distinctions, of all the production relations on which those class distinctions rest, of all the social relations that correspond to those production relations, and the revolutionizing of all the ideas that correspond to those social relations.

    Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America

     

    But a barrier to masses of people taking up this understanding was the too frequent suppression of critical thinking by the old communism. In contrast, Avakian calls for a socialist society with room to disagree and “air” for people to breathe. While maintaining socialist state power against any violent attempts to restore capitalism, the new socialist state is best characterized as having a solid core with a lot of elasticity. Communists should never fear the truth and should encourage dissent, because all truths can be learned from.

    Avakian points out that contradictions can arise between the people and a socialist state. While the socialist state has to protect the people from external enemies and any forceful restoration of capitalism, the socialist state also has to protect the rights of the people from the state itself. Of particular importance is Avakian’s insistence that communists lead the state mainly through ideological and political influence and not through organizational control. Members of the communist party must be subordinate to the law and the constitution of the socialist state, and are afforded no special privileges by virtue of being members of the party. 

    In particular, Avakian calls not only for the right of people to criticize the state and even call for the restoration of capitalism, but further, the state should in part fund such criticism and also fund the legal defense of persons prosecuted by the state to the same extent that the state funds their prosecution. This is a concept of legal rights that no capitalist state has ever dared espouse.

    Avakian has also sharply criticized the ideas that truth has a class basis (rather than truth being objective) and that working and oppressed people have a special purchase on truth simply by virtue of being exploited or oppressed. From this flowed the faulty idea that just putting working people in positions of power, rather than fighting for all of society to have a deeper understanding of the path to classless society, would solve the problems.

     

    Another example of faulty analysis in the old communism is the idea that the basis for communism is material abundance, from which flowed the idea that a socialist state could just “produce its way to communism.” There is a certain required level of abundance to have a communist economy, but the principal necessity is the change in people’s thinking and social relations—not how much material wealth there is to go around.

    The old communism also did not always do well with issues of internationalism. The goal of communist revolution is not the improvement of the lives of the people in a given country, but rather the global emancipation of humanity from the fetters of capital. As Avakian points out, the principal task of a communist country is to serve as a base area for world revolution. Yet too often communist leaders succumbed to nationalism and concentrated on the interests of their own country.

    Plus, there was a serious failure in the moral underpinnings for communism and the road to get there. The new communism of Bob Avakian is firm in holding that the ends do not justify the means. Crimes cannot be committed on the grounds that they will get us closer to communism. Rather, communist means must always flow from and be consistent with the goals of communism.

    Bob Avakian's Work on Fascism: 1996-2025

     

    Like Marx, Avakian has been a prolific commentator on current events and has provided invaluable guidance. In particular, he has over the last forty years documented and warned of the rise of Christian nationalism and fascism in this country. (Here, see Bob Avakian’s Work on Fascism: 1996-2025.) People in Germany might have had the excuse that “no one could have seen what was coming.” People in this country cannot claim that excuse.

    At the same time, Avakian has looked much more deeply into the path for revolution in developed capitalist countries, and the deadly pull on even the best-intentioned people toward overestimating the strength of necessity and underestimating the freedom that exists to transform that necessity—ultimately leading them to either denying the possibility of, or just sitting and waiting for, a revolution. Instead, what is required is an active analysis of the fault lines of the existing society and constant straining at the limits of the possible with a concrete goal in mind:  the hastening of a revolutionary situation.

    It is important to understand that the body of work that Avakian has created is not an add-on, a refinement, or a particular application of Marxism. Rather it is a qualitative leap in the science itself, comparable to the leap made by Marx. At the time of Marx, capitalism had consolidated state power in America and the major states of Europe, and was spreading across the globe like a metastatic cancer. Humanity had nothing to confront it with save bourgeois democracy, syndicalism, or utopian concepts of socialism, often based in religion. Marx changed all that with a scientific explanation of the capitalist system and what had to be done to abolish it. 

    Today, with the defeat of the great revolutions of the 20th century, the globalization of capitalist production, the existential climate threat to the planet, and the world-wide spread of fascist movements, the old tools of bourgeois liberalism, social-democratic labor movements, and even the best of past communist thought, have been shown to be utterly inadequate to the challenges facing humanity. It is at this point that Bob Avakian has stepped forward to address what has to be done, but with a qualitatively transformed and more scientific, evidence-based method and approach. Avakian has given humanity the tools for its next great leap.

    Like Marx in his time, Avakian is a controversial figure. Marx was considered something of a dogmatist and sectarian by the reformists of his day. To get a feel for this, people should watch Raoul Peck’s film The Young Karl Marx. Yet like other great scientists before and after him, the insights of Marx have proven basically true and have come to both shape our understanding of the real world and alter the course of history.

    Having been witness to this development over many years now, I can say that if you are serious about emancipating humanity then you have to become a student of Bob Avakian. I have to admit that as a student of Avakian, I was often late for class and didn't always make good grades. But I never dropped out of school. Young revolutionaries today have the most advanced revolutionary thought in the world in their hands with their whole lifetimes ahead—and I still have another 15 years. Together, let's run with it!

    There is much, much more, but I would encourage people to dig into Avakian’s many written works such as The New Communism, the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, and Breakthroughs.

    Codicil

    In December 2020 at the height of the COVID crisis in New York City, I was living a few blocks from a major hospital in Brooklyn. Outside the front of that hospital, lines formed daily of people waiting to be seen in the emergency room. Around back, behind the hospital, there was a row of refrigerator trucks for the bodies for which there was no longer room in the hospital’s morgue. 

    While that pandemic crisis has abated for now, the global warming crisis has not. We are now pretty much past the point of no return. For about three billion years, plants, algae and cyanobacteria have been patiently extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, using solar energy to synthesize carbohydrates, and releasing oxygen back into the atmosphere. In the last three hundred years, that whole process has been dramatically reversed, with the burning of fossil fuels releasing carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere in massive quantities, trapping solar radiation in the form of heat. 

    Today, almost everything that moves in commerce (trucks, planes, trains) moves on energy released from the burning of fossil fuels (coal, petroleum and natural gas). Yet at the same time, the amount of energy that falls on the earth from solar radiation is more than enough to meet humanity’s foreseeable needs. So what prevents simply switching to solar energy in place of fossil fuels? The capitalism system.

    Many trillions of dollars of capital are invested in both fossil fuel powered equipment and in the extraction and distribution of fossil fuels. To abandon that, would require the literal destruction of all that capital. The owners of capital have zero incentive to eat that massive loss, and they have the powerful compulsion from competing capital to continue with what they are doing. Only a new communist revolution can change this and put humanity first. This is a basic reality, yet most people find it easier to imagine the end of the world than to imagine an end to capitalism.

    Interrelated with the climate crisis is the destruction of the viability of life for millions of people in their home countries. One result has been the mass migration of people from the global South toward white, imperial Europe and America. The year that I was born, 1940, was the “high water mark” for white people in America. Whites made up 90 percent of the population. Today, whites make up 60 percent of the population, and an even smaller percentage of school-age children. 

    That demographic change in the U.S., combined with the decline of U.S. economic power in the face of global competition and the impact of the movements of women and people of color, has provided the basis for a core of reactionary capitalists to organize a fascist movement. A movement appealing to the preservation of the economic well-being and social superiority to which white, male, Christian Americans feel entitled. Hence the emergence of a fascist movement to “Make America Great Again.”

    The horrors that consolidated fascism will wreak on this country and the world are beyond the imagination of most people. Trump must be driven from power NOW, before it is too late.

    BobAvakianOfficial Revolution #141

     

    Read/listen to this September 29, 2025 social media message from @BobAvakianOfficial.   

  • ARTICLE:

    Minnesota: Struggle Sharpens at the Top and Surges from Below—The High Stakes and What We Must Do

    On January 7, Renee Nicole Good was murdered by ICE thug Jonathan Ross in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Ross shot Good multiple times at close range, and then cursed her. “Fucking bitch” he said as he walked away from a woman still dying. 

    In response, people poured into the streets. The outrage and courageous struggle of the people in Minneapolis has, over the past 12 days, actually escalated in the face of both ever more violent repression and sub-zero weather. The fascist MAGA movement has intensified its violations of the rule of law and the norms of this system. This has taken sharpest form in Trump’s threat to invoke the Insurrection Act, which would enable him to deploy federal troops to crush the people resisting in Minneapolis. He seemed to momentarily back off of this, only to mobilize 1,500 federal troops on standby in Alaska on the weekend. Trump has not only continued to attack and threaten the Democratic governor and mayor, he is said to have launched a federal investigation of them for conspiracy to impede ICE agents. He has poured 3,000 ICE agents into Minneapolis, outnumbering local police by a 5 to 1 ratio. He unleashed his Department of Justice to investigate Renee Good’s widow, Becca—provoking six federal prosecutors to immediately resign. And meanwhile, Trump’s minions in the media and Congress began invoking the specter of civil war.

    If last week marked “a giant leap into full-out fascism,” it is hard to know what to say about this week—only that as part of that leap, the forms and norms of what had been regular imperialist rule continued to shake and shatter. This is rapidly becoming a situation in which, to quote the revolutionary leader Bob Avakian, “those who have ruled over us, for so long, can no longer do so in the ‘normal’ way that people have been conditioned to accept.”

    A State of Siege Enforced by Violent Thugs

    Teyana Gibson Brown after federal immigration officers broke down the door with a battering ram to arrest her husband Garrison Gibson, January 11, 2026.

     

    Federal immigration officers broke down the door with a battering ram to arrest Garrison Gibson, January 11, 2026.    Photo: AP/John Locher

    Teyana Gibson Brown, after ICE assaulted her home and arrested her husband, January 11, 2026.

     

    Teyana Gibson Brown, after ICE assaulted her home and arrested her husband, January 11, 2026.    Photo: AP/John Locher

    The whole population of Minneapolis is under siege, with thuggish agents everywhere. This is especially true for immigrants who fear going to work, buying food, picking up prescriptions or walking their kids to school. (An important part of the resistance there has been people teaming up to make sure immigrants get food and medications and are as safe as possible.)

    But it's not just immigrants. ICE is openly targeting people because they are not white or have an accent—and in complete violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, ICE is demanding people show them proof of citizenship. ICE is rampaging through the city, harassing and often violently abducting immigrants—and violently attacking anyone, including citizens—who stands up to them courageously in peaceful protest and defense of immigrants.

    Five days after killing Renee Good, heavily armed ICE agents without a valid warrant smashed down the door of a Liberian man’s home, while his wife and small child were inside. He was seized and thrown into detention at an Army base in El Paso, Texas. 

    On January 14, ICE agents chased a man into his home and then shot their guns through the door, with no concern as to the fact that children were inside. The wounded man, who is Venezuelan, was taken to the hospital, and two people who had come to his aid were arrested. Meanwhile, hundreds of neighbors gathered in the street, demanding that the Minneapolis police arrest the ICE agent, and demanding that ICE leave the area and the city. ICE responded by firing flash bang grenades and pepper gas at the crowd. 

    Other incidents, captured on video, show gangs of ICE thugs violently pulling people out of their cars and beating them mercilessly as bystanders are filming or screaming at them to stop. And it has now also become quite “normal” for ICE agents to demand that randomly selected non-white people “show me your papers” and submit to questioning to “prove” they have a right to be here.

    Tweet URL

    Video posted by Minneapolis resident Phil Maddox.

    This wave of lawless violence is being unleashed by top fascist leaders. For example: less than a week after the murder of Renee Good, senior Trump advisor Stephen Miller posted this message to federal agents: “You have immunity to perform your duties, and no one—no city official, no state official, no illegal alien, no leftist agitator or domestic insurrectionist—can prevent you from fulfilling your legal obligations and duties.” Translation: “You are above the law; kill, beat or maim anyone that gets in your way.”

    ICE thugs are running with the message. Repeatedly, ICE agents are referencing Good’s murder as a direct threat to protesters. Minneapolis resident Phil Maddox posted a video to reddit of ICE agents, one with his gun drawn, boxing his car in and telling him “you won't like the outcome" if he follows the agents. "You did not learn from what just happened?’” Patty O'Keefe and a friend, both U.S. citizens were legally observing ICE from their car when they were violently arrested and detained by ICE. ICE sprayed pepper spray into their windshield vent to fill the car, broke the windshield and pulled them from their car. On the way to the detention center, an ICE agent threatened Patty, "you guys got to stop obstructing us, that's why that lesbian bitch is dead." The "lesbian bitch" is a vicious woman-hating reference to Renee Good.

    Defeating Fascism and Raising Your Sights Beyond the Confines of This System Which Has Given Rise to This Fascism

    As we wrote last week:

    Whatever you thought “normal” was (under fascism!) died on a snowy Minnesota street with Renee Nicole Good.… People must be brought to see and to really “take on board” the implications of this basic fact. We cannot pin our hopes on or wait for elections that may well never happen. We must act now, together and determined, uniting all who can be united, in sustained, nonviolent protest demanding: Trump Must Go NOW!

    At the same time, people urgently need to be asking these questions, and digging deeply for answers:

    What kind of a system puts the reins of power into the hands of these ugly fascist thugs waging illegitimate violence against righteous people standing up? What kind of system drives people from their homelands for the basic ability to survive, and then demonizes and mass-deports them in the most vicious way? What kind of system unleashes dark-ages misogyny against women who do not "know their place"? 

    It is this system of capitalism-imperialism which has given rise to this fascism, and is responsible for so many other atrocities. 

    Now ask yourself, what kind of a system do we need? What kind of system could give backing to the broad aspirations of so many to defend and support each other in the face of fascist violence? What kind of system could give backing to the desire for collective means of survival instead of cutthroat dog-eat-dog competition? 

    In this rare time, when revolution has become more possible, it is more and more urgent to raise your sights and think outside the confines of this system, to the need and possibility for a radically different system. The concrete framework and blueprint for this is spelled out in the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, authored by Bob Avakian. And the vision for this is distilled in the Declaration from the revcoms, We Need and We Demand: A Whole New Way to Live, a Fundamentally Different System:

    A whole different way of living is possible: a whole different way to organize society, with a radically different economic foundation and political system, emancipating relations among people and an uplifting culture—all of this oriented to meeting the basic needs and fulfilling the highest interests of the masses of people.

    Broader, Deeper, More Determined—and Searching for Answers

    This week will witness demonstrations across the country in deep opposition to the brutal murder of Renee Good and the escalating repression that this fascist regime has imposed on top of that horror. These demonstrations should be built very broadly. The undeniable fascism of this regime, now hurtling forward at such breakneck speed, must be called out for what it is and opposed. The indictment from RefuseFascism.org should be gotten out widely, and people who are ready to recognize and resist this threat must be brought forward and organized. 

    Revcoms should be spreading the word about Bob Avakian’s 2025 interviews, which deeply analyze the roots of this fascism within this capitalist-imperialist system, how a revolution could be made to uproot that system, and what that revolution would actually do toward the emancipation of humanity. They should also be widely passing out “WE NEED AND WE DEMAND: A WHOLE NEW WAY TO LIVE, A FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT SYSTEM.”

    For above all, does not the intensifying and pervasive persecution of immigrants and the murder of someone like Renee Nicole Good, along with poisonous hatred of women that has accompanied that crime, both make clear that this is humanity’s great and urgently pressing need?

    The Bob Avakian Interviews, 2025

     

    Watch The Bob Avakian Interviews, 2025   

    Misogyny, White Supremacy and Outright Nazi-ism

    Another aspect of the intensifying fascist assault now concentrated in Minnesota has been the open unleashing of Nazi-style propaganda, both officially from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and even more crudely among the various fascist news media, influencers, and other “unofficial” mouthpieces. (See Right-wing media are describing pro-immigrant Minnesota activists using the language of war from Media Matters for nearly 20 documented examples of this.) And typical of Naziism, and a key cornerstone and “recruiting pitch” for MAGA, has been the crude and hateful misogyny (hatred of women) that has flowed out of MAGA.

    Tweet URL
    Greg Bovino  wearing a coat that is a near replica of a German Nazi stormtrooper coat.

     

    Greg Bovino  wearing a coat that is a near replica of a German Nazi stormtrooper coat.     Photo: social media

    Tweet URL
    Tweet URL

    Let’s start with the Naziism. For some time, DHS has been recruiting for ICE using memes and slogans closely associated with white supremacist organizations, such as calling on potential recruits to “defend the homeland” from outsiders while featuring heroic images of white men. And just last week, the U.S. Labor department wrote on social media: “One Homeland. One People. One Heritage. Remember who you are, American,” which closely echoes the German Nazi slogan “Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer”—“One People, One Nation, One Leader.” On Saturday, the fascist Border Patrol Commander Greg Bovino, who has been directly on the ground leading these violent operations, wore a coat that is a near replica of a German Nazi stormtrooper coat. The Daily Wire’s Matt Welsh demands the federal government “Wage war against the terrorists because as the Renee Good case demonstrates very clearly, they're already waging war against us.” (Emphasis added to highlight savage lunacy of these fascists.)

    Sneering misogyny (hatred of women) has been a major feature of the fascist “commentary” since the killing of Renee Nicole Good. Stung and infuriated by the heroic role being played by thousands of women, and by the specter of white women rejecting the sick ideology and program of white supremacy and America First chauvinism, these fascists have branded heroes such as Good as “AWFUL (Affluent White Female Urban Liberals).” 

    Radio host Erick Erickson tweeted, “An AWFUL (Affluent White Female Urban Liberal) is dead after running her car into an ICE agent who opened fire on her. Progressive whites are turning violent. ICE agents have the right to defend themselves.” And former liberal-turned fascist Naomi Wolf, posted: “Liberal men at this point (sorry) are disproportionately estrogenized, physically passive, submissive due to woke gender hectoring, or porn-addicted. White liberal women are disproportionately sexually frustrated. Policing others as in the pandemic was an outlet for them, but it was not nearly enough. The smiles you see on their faces now say it all: white women long for all out combat with ICE—who tend to be strong, physically confident, masculine men—because the conflict is a form of physical release for them.”

  • ARTICLE:

    Trump's Global Rampage, and the Method to the Madness

    We, the people of the world, can no longer afford to allow these imperialists to continue to dominate the world and determine the destiny of humanity. They need to be overthrown as quickly as possible. And it is a scientific fact that humanity does not have to live this way. 
    —Bob Avakian, revolutionary leader and architect of the new communism

    Last week, the U.S. bombed the sovereign nation of Venezuela, killing over 100 civilians and kidnapping the President, Nicolás Maduro. Since then, Trump and other forces in his fascist regime have been on a rampage: threatening to attack and asserting his right to dominate, control and invade any country anywhere—without any legal constraint. But while Trump sounds like a madman, this is not just madness. They are laying out their fascist strategy to remake the world in the interests of a fascist America more able to contend with who they see as their main imperialist rival, China. 

    In a world of intense cutthroat competition between nuclear-armed powers, Trump's fascist military moves and attempts to bully countries and whole regions of the world hold the extreme danger of spiraling out into nuclear confrontation, which really could lead to the extinction of humanity.

    In this article we are going to cover Trump's outrageous threats, the fascist justification, strategy and dynamics behind them, the accelerating drive towards global conflict—and where the interests of humanity do, and do not, lie.  (Go here for this week's article on “Why Trump Says Greenland Is Essential for American Strategic Interests.”)

    "If we don't do it the easy way, we're going to do it the hard way."

    Tweet URL

    Since last Saturday, Trump has threatened Cuba and Colombia, threatened land strikes in Mexico, and threatened to attack Iran. He has repeated the openly gangster threat to invade Greenland: "We are going to do something on Greenland whether they like it or not because if we don't do it, Russia or China will take over Greenland.... If we don't do it the easy way, we're gonna do it the hard way."

    This is not just a threat on Greenland, but a threat on longtime American allies in NATO (Greenland is controlled by the European imperialist country Denmark).1 This kind of military threat on European allies is unprecedented and, if the big European powers don't just capitulate to Trump's demand for Greenland (which they very well might), it could either lead to war or the dissolution of NATO.

    Tweet URL

    Similar to Trump's argument in defending the assault on Venezuela, Trump's key advisor and fascist ghoul, Stephen Miller, argued in an interview on CNN:

    The United States is using its military to secure our interests unapologetically in our hemisphere.... We're a superpower. And under President Trump, we are going to conduct ourselves as a superpower. It is absurd that we would allow a nation in our own backyard to become the supplier of resources to our adversaries, but not to us, to hoard weapons for our adversaries, to be able to be positioned as an asset against the United States rather than on behalf of the United States.

    Miller didn't spell this out, but in speaking of U.S. "adversaries," he was talking about China, which purchased more—perhaps much more—than half of Venezuelan oil and overall, over the past decade, has enormously increased its trade, investment and aid in Latin America. 

    Trump Restrained Only by His Fascist "Morality"

    This remaking of the global order involves shredding any pretense to international law, breaking up old alliances and much more violently and forcefully asserting the U.S. right and ability to dominate the Western Hemisphere and the whole world. 

    The revolutionary leader Bob Avakian described this powerfully in a social media message last spring: 

    Fascism is a qualitatively different way that this system enforces its rule over people

    Trump fascism is a regime that openly and aggressively strips away basic rights and blatantly declares that there is no rule of law and due process of law other than what it dictates, and that raw destructive power is what must rule in the international arena, without even the pretense of adherence to international law or concern about the sovereignty, or even the right to exist, of less powerful peoples and countries.

    In a New York Times interview last week, Trump himself made this shockingly plain. Here was the exchange:

    Reporter 1: Do you see any checks on your power on the world stage?

    TRUMP: Yeah. There's one thing. My own morality. My own mind. That's the only thing that can stop me.

    Reporter 2: Not international law?

    TRUMP: I don't need international law. I'm not looking to hurt people.

    Pause on that for a minute: the only check on Trump is his "own morality" and his "own mind." Leave aside the fact there can be no justice without the rule of law—whoever is in power. But this is the cold, calculating Trump who lies like breathing. Trump who hates Black and Brown people, and "foreigners," and demeans them as "animals, criminals and rapists who are poisoning the blood of our country." Trump—completely lacking in compassion and empathy who revels in the suffering of those he sees as weak or a "stain and a drain" on society and who has led a movement to meme-ify hatred and gleefully celebrate vicious racist cruelty. Trump who openly fantasizes about executing his opponents, reveling in revenge and retribution. Trump at the helm of a lunatic force of millions who think he has been appointed by god to rescue America as a white Christian nation violently dominating the world. 

    And when Trump says, "I'm not looking to hurt people," in his sick mind, he means this. Because he does not consider those he has already hurt—and all the millions he intends to hurt—as "people." Trump does not see the immigrants and women, LGBT people, those who oppose him, and the billions from "shithole" countries as human.

    This is an illegitimate, fascist morality: one that the millions of decent people need to recognize, and come together to defeat!

    A Strategy for a Fascist America Dominating the Planet

    Map of western hemisphere

     

    Click image to enlarge    Map: York Universidad

    There is a view, on the part of the fascist section of the ruling class, that the whole global alignment coming out of World War 2 has become a fetter, an obstacle, to full U.S. global domination now being challenged by a rising China. This previous order involved the U.S. sitting atop strategic alliances with Europe, dominating the world with a thin cover of abiding by "international law," or acting in the "name of democracy." 

    The truth is that American domination has meant more intensified exploitation of the people of the world and the environment through globalized networks of sweatshops, mines, and farmlands, all serving the needs of empire. The U.S. has violently enforced this plunder through the slaughter of millions of people since World War 2—from Korea to Vietnam, Indonesia, Haiti and Latin America, Iraq, Afghanistan, and many other countries. The widespread destruction from this, combined with intensified climate change, has forced millions from their homes and homelands.

    But this was done with high-minded lies and working with allies.

    The fascists are tearing all this up, and aiming to impose a different strategy and vision. One that deals with what they see as existential challenges to America's rule. This is spelled out in the National Security Statement released last December.

    As part of this, Trump, Miller and the rest have been touting Trump's version of the "Monroe Doctrine." This refers to a doctrine issued by President Monroe in 1823. Monroe declared the entire Western Hemisphere as the U.S. "sphere of influence," warning European powers to keep out. This wasn't an empty policy. Since then, the U.S. has intervened in South and Central America at least 100 times—through invasions, CIA coups, training death squads, and more. This has led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people and endless misery for the people of those countries. (For an extensive list of these interventions, go here.)

    Now, the fascists are feeling extreme urgency to more tightly control the whole of the Western Hemisphere both to roll back China's ability to operate in the region, and to shore up a regional foundation from which to contend with China. In the press conference which announced the invasion of Venezuela, Trump threatened: "Under our new national security strategy, American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will never be questioned again."

    But all this will not be easy. While these fascists can accomplish a great deal through force and violence, they do not have everything in control and the future is extremely uncertain and dangerous. 

    Ramping Up America's Deadly War Machine

    Screengrabs from videos of U.S. bombing of Caracas, Venezuela

     

    U.S. bombing of Caracas, Venezuela, January 3, 2026   

    At the same time as Trump is threatening the world, he announced a proposal to increase the military budget by 50 percent—from $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion! This is attempting to deal with a major strategic problem faced by U.S. imperialism: despite the U.S.'s military might, it has an outdated, bureaucratic and relatively slow "military industrial base" in contrast to China. China spends less than a quarter of what the U.S. spends on its military, but has hundreds of thousands more soldiers, and in some ways, a more technologically advanced and much faster-paced military apparatus. In an interview last year, the fascist "Secretary of War" Pete Hegseth said that in the last 10-15 years, "the Pentagon has a perfect record in all of its war games against China... we lose every time."

    To deal with this, Hegseth announced an attempt to remake the whole process of American weapons building. He said last fall, "We're not building for peace time. We are pivoting the Pentagon and our industrial base to a wartime footing." 

    Combined with the military preparations, there is the ideological component. Hegseth is working to forge a fully fascist military cohered around open white supremacy, the macho degradation of women and hatred of LGBT people, and America first threats of violent domination—with a license to openly commit war crimes and crimes against humanity, pledging their allegiance to the fascist tyrant above all else. But this, too, is full of contradiction for these fascists in a military made up of almost half Black, Latino and other people of color and 17 percent women. They are very far along in their agenda, but here again, the fascists do not have this all sewn up. (To read more about these changes in the military, go here, here and here.)

    The Democrats: Denouncing Trump Within the Confines of U.S. Imperialism

    There have been some individual Democrats who have called out the illegality of Trump's open violation of international and domestic law. Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said Trump's kidnapping of Maduro was "clearly illegal under international law." 

    But the main leading Democratic Party politicians have only criticized Trump for not getting congressional approval. Hakeem Jeffries, leader of the House Democrats, started his statement by saying, "Nicolas Maduro is a criminal and authoritarian dictator who has oppressed the people of Venezuela for years. He is not the legitimate head of government." After a full paragraph along these lines, Jeffries acted as if the problem was that Trump didn't have a good enough plan for "what's next," and finally went on to critique the way Trump illegally stepped around Congress.

    Unmentioned in these statements is that the biggest criminal and illegitimate head of government in the world right now is the fascist head of the world's #1 global oppressor: Donald Trump, who has no fucking right to invade countries and steal their resources like a rampaging vampire.

    The biggest cries of concern have to do with the fact that Trump's moves could give a green light to China and Russia to do the same kind of thing. After critiquing the illegality of what Trump did, Himes argued, "So what China and Russia just learned is that the beacon of liberty and rule of law in the world [sic] has now green lighted snatch-and-grab operations in Estonia, in Taiwan, wherever Xi and Putin decide they want to go next."2

    But all those concerns are confined within the terms of what serves this monstrous, blood-soaked system—the same system that's given rise to this fascism.

    Feverish Competition and Contention Driven by This System of Capitalism-Imperialism

    teaser REVOLUTION 42

     

    Read/listen to this social media message from @BobAvakianOfficial.   

    These dangerous moves on the part of the fascist section of the rulers are not just driven by greed, or unhinged fascist lunacy, but by the underlying driving dynamics of a system of capitalism-imperialism. In his 2018 talk, Why We Need an Actual Revolution and How We Can Really Make Revolution, Bob Avakian gave life to the "expand or die" dynamics of this:

    ...we live in a grossly lopsided world—a world where a few dozen billionaires have as much wealth as the poorer half of humanity, and a small number of ruling classes, in a small number of countries, dominate, oppress, and control the destiny of the masses of humanity, with consequences that are already terrible and could before long become catastrophic. And, in everything that I have been shining a light on—regarding the world we live in, under the domination of capitalism-imperialism—we are seeing the consequences of a system based on the private appropriation, by competing centers of capital, of wealth that is socially produced through networks of production involving vast numbers—ultimately billions—of people all over the globe, who are forced to work in relations of production and conditions that exploit and dehumanize them. It is not simply greed that drives these capitalists to constantly seek out ways to more ruthlessly exploit people—it is the fact that, if they do not do this, or if some other capitalists do it more successfully (that is, even more ruthlessly), then they will face the prospect of not just falling behind but actually going under, eaten up by other capitalist sharks. It is the private appropriation of socially produced wealth, and the anarchy—the feverish competition and contention—that results from thiswhich ultimately underlies and drives all the horrors that are concentrated in the “5 STOPS”3 and the conditions to which the masses of humanity are subjected.

    "This system is completely absurd—criminally, monstrously absurd—and completely outmoded"

    From all this, we can see that the top oppressors are willing to risk all of life on earth in jockeying for position to be the world's #1 exploiter. This is utter insanity. Especially when it's the case that all the technology and knowledge that goes to building machines of death and networks of exploitation could be unfettered to meet human need—if we had a radically different system. 

    The sharp divides among the rulers of this system and their inability to rule in the ways that masses of people in the U.S. have been conditioned to accept makes this a rare time when revolution—real revolution to bring that radically different system into being—is more possible. Right now, more than "normal times," the utter illegitimacy of this system is hanging out for all to see. But people need to be challenged to confront the system that is driving this, and raise their sights to the fact that we don't have to live this way:

    This system is completely absurd—criminally, monstrously absurd—and completely outmoded: long past its expiration date, past the time when it can lead to anything positive for humanity—and, on the contrary, it stands as the direct barrier to the emancipation of humanity from all this madness, atrocity, and unnecessary suffering. The rise of fascism, in many other countries as well as in the U.S. itself, is a glaring sign of the thoroughly outmoded nature of this system and the heightened danger it poses to humanity as a whole.

    We are now at the point where it is more and more urgently necessary to move beyond this whole monstrous system—beyond a situation where people are forced to struggle just for individual survival, with everyone compelled to be in competition and conflict with others, and the masses of people everywhere are chained down by outmoded oppressive relations, while the future, and the very existence, of humanity is increasingly endangered.

    And it is possible now to move beyond all this.

    A whole different way of living is possible: a whole different way to organize society, with a radically different economic foundation and political system, emancipating relations among people and an uplifting culture—all of this oriented to meeting the basic needs and fulfilling the highest interests of the masses of people. This is set forth, in both a sweeping and concrete way, in the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, which I have written. Summaries of basic points in this Constitution—shining a light on the truly emancipating way we could be living—are laid out in the Declaration WE NEED AND WE DEMAND: A WHOLE NEW WAY TO LIVE, A FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT SYSTEM. (This Declaration, as well as the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, is available at revcom.us.)

    —from Bob Avakian, 2025: A New Year—Profound New Challenges—And a Profoundly Positive Way Forward in the Face of Very Real Horror

    In the Name of Humanity, We Refuse to Accept a Fascist America!

    This Whole System is Rotten and Illegitimate! We Need and We Demand: A Whole New Way to Live, a Fundamentally Different System!

     

    Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America cover 240

     

    WE NEED AND WE DEMAND A WHOLE NEW WAY TO LIVE, A FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT FUTURE

     

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. NATO stands for the Northern Atlantic Treaty Organization. This major military alliance between the U.S., Europe and other Western imperialists has been the predominant military alliance in the world since the end of World War 2. A key element of this military alliance is the agreement that if one NATO country is attacked, all other NATO countries have to use their military to support them. [back]

    2. Estonia is a small country on Russia’s western border, and a member of the NATO alliance opposed to Russia. Taiwan is an island of 23 million people off the coast of mainland China, which the Chinese rulers consider part of their territory and have declared their intention to retake control of at some point. The U.S., in turn, considers Taiwan to be strategically important to its interests in Asia and has supplied the government there with billions of dollars in advanced weapons. [back]

    3. The "5 Stops" refers to the deep and defining contradictions of this system: the oppression of Black people and other people of color, the oppression of women and oppressive gender relations, the demonization and deportation of immigrants, the destruction of the planet and wars for empire. [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    Why Trump Says Greenland Is Essential for American Strategic Interests

    Map of world showing Greenland in red.

     

    Greenland   

    To understand the strategic role of Greenland to the U.S.'s ability to control the world, it's very helpful to look at a map. Greenland sits at a critical area between North America, Europe, and the Arctic. 

    From the perspective of the U.S. empire, controlling Greenland is not optional. This is due to several interlocking factors: (a) the need to control travel routes and shipping lanes around Greenland (which helps control access between Europe and North America), (b) to maintain access to the Arctic (preventing China and Russia from roaming freely), and (c) to have the sole ability to build up military infrastructure on the island (the region is key to detecting and blocking submarine and bomber routes, especially from Russia). And, as climate change accelerates, this may open up access to Greenland's large reserves of rare earth minerals which are essential for new technologies. Right now, the U.S. sees its dependence on China for these rare earth minerals as a big strategic weakness, and they want to prevent China, and other imperialist powers, from controlling these strategic resources. 

    At this point, even as the U.S. has a large military base in Greenland, it is ultimately Denmark and Europe overall that is supposed to "defend" Greenland and prevent Russia and China from having free rein there. But the American fascists don't think Europe is at all aggressive enough in this. 

    This dovetails with serious concerns about what these American fascists see as the "decline of Europe." The November 2025 National Security Statement warned of the danger of Europe's "civilizational erasure"—because there has been an influx of migrants (due to the nightmare imperialism has wrought in their homelands), Europe is losing its "Western" (aka white Christian) "identity." And Trump is constantly railing against Europe for relying too heavily on America's military might and not investing heavily enough in European military strength.

  • ARTICLE:

    From RefuseFascism.org:

    The People’s Indictment of Donald Trump: A Unified Declaration of Illegitimacy

    Revcom.us editors’ note: This indictment was originally posted at RefuseFascism.org. We are reposting on our site with permission.

    Find links to PDF versions of the Indictment and graphics for printing below

    Donald Trump

     

    History teaches that fascists, once firmly in power, are extraordinarily difficult to remove. It is absolutely critical that we take up the responsibility to expel such a regime before consolidation becomes irreversible. Donald Trump’s fascist administration, through repeated injuries, usurpations, and acts of violence, has forfeited any claim to legitimacy. Therefore, We the People submit the following indictment asserting that the Trump administration constitutes an illegitimate fascist regime and must be removed from power.

    Donald Trump: You are indicted for crimes against the people of the United States and installing fascism in the U.S.

    I. A Regime of Tyranny and Betrayal of the Constitution

    The Trump administration has systematically violated the fundamental principles of the U.S. Constitution. The promises of liberty, justice, equality, consent of the governed, and the rule of law have ALL been eroded by the actions of a President who is sworn to preserve and defend them.

    Trump has defied federal courts, ignored lawful orders, targeted judges and lawyers, and replaced constitutional governance with rule by decree. He has used executive power to obstruct justice, override Congress, and install loyalists who serve his will rather than the public good.

    He has wielded federal agencies as weapons against immigrants, protesters, journalists, and political opponents, even threatening the execution of members of Congress. This administration has undermined basic democratic rights, targeted marginalized communities, and shredded civil liberties with open contempt.

    II. Crimes of Fascism and the Consolidation of Dictatorship

    Trump’s MAGA Fascism aims to install an open dictatorship, unrestrained and unchecked, reliant on white-supremacist Christian-nationalism, misogyny, xenophobia, and violent repression. The actions of this administration are not isolated — they form a coherent fascist program. Traditional democratic channels cannot halt a regime that destroys those very channels.

    Count One: Violent Persecution and Terrorizing of Immigrants

    Trump unleashed heavily armed federal strike forces and illegally mobilized National Guard units to target immigrants and anyone racially profiled as such. ICE became his private army — disappearing people, terrorizing children, defying courts, and deporting individuals to torture and abuse in concentration camps both here and overseas.

    Count Two: Lawless International Aggression

    Trump has openly disregarded international law and disparaged our allies, waged unauthorized military actions, threatened wider war, and supported acts of genocide and war crimes. He asserted a doctrine of U.S. domination over entire regions, dismissing international law and human rights.

    Count Three: Attacks on Elections and Voting Rights

    Trump pardoned January 6th insurrectionists, empowered election deniers, gerrymandered Black and Brown communities out of political power, and enabled voter suppression schemes designed to entrench minority rule.

    Count Four: Subversion of the Courts

    The Supreme Court — illegitimately packed with Trump loyalists — continues to overrule lower courts, often through unexplained “shadow docket” decisions. They have surrendered judicial independence, suppressed the voice of the people, and enabled the regime’s assault on the Constitution.

    Count Five: Weaponizing Federal Power Against Political Opponents

    The administration twisted law enforcement and prosecutorial powers into instruments of retribution. Political enemies, NGOs, journalists, and movement activists were all targeted.

    III. A History of Repeated Injuries, Usurpations, and Abuses

    The Trump regime has intensified white supremacy, misogyny, and the erasure of LGBTQ+ people; demonized immigrants; escalated militarism; and undermined science and public health.

    To establish and enforce white supremacy, Trump exalted the Confederacy, purged diversity programs, attacked the teaching of Black and Native history, removed symbols of civil rights progress, and installed white supremacists in key positions.

    To subjugate women and erase LGBTQ+ people, Trump dismantled reproductive rights, threatened nationwide abortion bans, outlawed gender-affirming care, purged transgender people from public institutions, and reinstated oppressive norms as state policy.

    To target entire peoples and escalate global conflict, Trump carried out mass deportations, stripped legal protections from migrants, bombed foreign nations illegally, backed genocide, and invoked 19th century doctrines of imperial domination.

    To consolidate dictatorship, he declared himself above the Constitution, weaponized the DOJ, attacked universities and the press, purged the military, and created a personalist authoritarian system.

    IV. Violations of Human and Civil Rights at Home and Abroad

    Trump’s administration has committed widespread violations of civil, constitutional, and human rights:

    • Silencing journalists, suppressing protest, and retaliating against whistleblowers.
    • Warrantless surveillance, unlawful detentions, and militarized policing.
    • Cruel treatment of detainees; particularly women and children, immigrants, and transgender individuals.
    • Rollback of LGBTQ+ protections, racial equity programs, disability rights, and reproductive freedoms.
    • Family separations, denial of asylum, and deportations to known torture regimes.
    • Abandonment of international human rights commitments and obstruction of war-crimes investigations.

    These constitute moral, legal, and humanitarian crimes deserving the strongest condemnation.

    V. A Government of, by, and for Tyrants

    Trump, and the officials complicit in his regime, have enriched themselves while undermining public health, education, economic stability, environmental protections, and essential social programs. They have dismantled oversight mechanisms, sold influence to the wealthy, and reduced governance to a corrupt spectacle.

    This is an authoritarian plutocracy government, run by and for a corrupt elite.

    VI. The Mandate of the People: Trump Must Go NOW

    No matter how they attain power, fascist regimes are never legitimate. Trump’s regime poses a direct threat to humanity in an era of climate catastrophe, nuclear proliferation, and global instability.

    Therefore, we declare:

    • President Donald Trump needs to be removed from power immediately.
    • The entire Trump regime is illegitimate.
    • Its continued rule violates the Constitution, human rights, and the principles of a free society.
    • Any further executive or legislative action that oppresses or exploits the people constitutes a direct attack on the public.

    VII. A Call to Action for a Free and Just Future

    Fascism is not a looming threat. It is upon us now. It is a completely different, brutal, form of rule. It cannot be lived with; it must be defeated.

    Fascist rule is never legitimate, no matter how it comes to power. This administration surrendered any claim to “legitimacy” the minute they began using their power to violate and dismantle the U.S. Constitution and our rule of law.

    If we dare, we can defeat this horror unlike anything we’ve faced before. If we fail to even try, future generations will never forgive us.

    There can be no business as usual under fascism; that’s why we call on people across this country to join us in sustained, nonviolent mass resistance. To walk out of work, to walk out of school, and to come from all across the country — millions together in the streets of the nation’s capital — returning again and again, day after day, until the Trump regime falls!

    The future is unwritten. Which one we get is up to us.

    IN THE NAME OF HUMANITY,
    WE REFUSE TO ACCEPT A FASCIST AMERICA.
    TRUMP MUST GO NOW!

    People's Indictment of Trump

     

    To print the Indictment and related graphics, go to RefuseFascism.org:
    • Find English and Spanish PDFs of the Indictment in several different formats. Click here and then click "Flyers" and scroll down the page to see the different formats.
    • Find pictures in PDF illustrating the Five Counts of the Crimes of Fascism and the Consolidation of Dictatorship here.
  • ARTICLE:

    Iran’s Islamic Republic Slaughters Thousands of People Righteously Standing Up

    Now Is Not the Time to Choose Between Oppressors

    Iranians at an anti-government protest in Tehran, Iran, January 9, 2026.

     

    Iranians at an anti-government protest in Tehran, Iran, January 9, 2026.    Photo: AP/UGC

    Bodies are piling up on bodies. And those who have survived are searching for signs of their loved ones through mountains of corpses. This is no longer a metaphor. This is not a story. This is not a film. This is a reality ridden with bullets day after day.

    — World-renowned filmmaker Jafar Panahi

    On December 28, the Iranian people launched a powerful uprising against their hated rulers—the theocratic fascists of the Islamic Republic (IRI). It quickly spread across the country to some 180 towns in all 31 of Iran’s provinces, involving many tens of thousands of Iranians, perhaps millions. 

    To crush this tsunami of mass protests, the IRI unleashed a campaign of mass murder, arrests and terror across the country. Rivers of blood flow through the streets of Iran, in every city and region.

    Beginning around January 8, when the protests leaped in size and scope, the regime’s repressive forces began firing directly into the crowds with live ammunition, sometimes at close range. Rooftop snipers assassinated overwhelmingly unarmed demonstrators. Machine guns were used against protesters according to some reports. Security forces were seen “finishing off” wounded protesters—sometimes even in hospitals. 

    As the Islamic fundamentalist rulers unleashed this bloodbath, they also imposed a near-total cutoff of internet and cellphone access to prevent the protests from spreading further and to prevent the world from witnessing their towering crimes. 

    Yet glimpses of the carnage and stories of the regime’s depravity leaked out of Iran nonetheless.  

    The numbers of those killed are uncertain. Some say that at least 3,400 protesters have been slaughtered by the regime, with thousands wounded. The Sunday Times of London wrote this weekend that they had received a report from doctors in Iran documenting the murder of 16,500 protesters who have died and 330,000 who have been injured. The fascist theocrat-in-chief, Khamenei himself, has admitted to the murder of "several thousands" of protesters. At least 10,000 protesters, and maybe double the number, have been arrested and jailed, some 800 threatened with execution. It's likely that most of those killed are under 30.

    Bodies lie in body bags on the ground outside Kahrizak Forensic Medical Centre in Tehran, Iran, January 11, 2026.

     

    Bodies lie in body bags on the ground outside Kahrizak Forensic Medical Centre in Tehran, Iran, January 11, 2026.    Photo: Middle East Online

    The Islamic Republic’s depraved killing and terrorizing spree extended into hospitals, family homes, even funerals for those it murdered. One doctor reported that his hospital was overwhelmed: “This was a mass-casualty situation… Our facilities, space and personnel were far below the number of injured people arriving. The trauma cases I saw were brutal, shoot to kill.” An ophthalmologist in Tehran told The Guardian that a single hospital documented more than 400 eye injuries from gunshots.

    The IRI’s armed thugs are occupying and searching hospitals for wounded protesters, arresting them on the spot, sometimes taking them away before they’ve been treated. Families who come to morgues or hospitals to retrieve the bodies of loved ones have been forced to declare that their relatives were members of the regime’s hated Basij militias, or that they’d been killed by “terrorists” (i.e., the protesters) in order to receive their bodies. Families have also been made to pay—sometimes according to the number of bullets used—for their release.

    A Righteous Uprising, a Damning Indictment of the Islamic Republic

    Iranian families looking for bodies at Kahrizak Forensics Medical Center in Tehran

     

    This uprising began on December 28, 2025, with a strike and protests by merchants in Tehran due to an economic crisis. But the rebellion spread quickly across Iran, largely driven forward by students demanding “Down with the Dictator,” “Down with [Ayatollah] Khamenei,” “Freedom, freedom, freedom.”

    But this uprising is not merely economic. As a post by Arash Seyfi on Osyan's instagram feed states, "Although the initial spark of this uprising were the economic demands... what soon became clear was that it went beyond limited demands for a livable income and any kind of bargaining with the system. The current revolutionary uprising targets the entirety of the Islamic fascist regime—a system that is neither capable of providing a minimum subsistence nor of providing a meaningful future for society." 

    The Islamic Republic is justifying their mass murder with the lie that the protesters are “terrorists,” inspired or directed by the U.S. or Israel. While there are many different forces involved in Iran’s protests, including pro-U.S. reactionaries, at its heart is a thirst—and a courageous determination—for freedom and emancipation. 

    Meanwhile, the fascist commander-in-chief of U.S. imperialism, Donald Trump, threatened to intervene, saying “help is on the way,” and urged the protesters to “take over your institutions if you can."

    Whatever attack Trump is threatening will be of no "help" to the people of Iran, but would be aimed at attempting to solidify U.S. domination of the Middle East. (The U.S. would, among other things, like to deal a blow to its main imperialist rival, China, which is Iran’s largest trading partner and buys 90 percent of Iran’s oil.)

    A statement on January 7, 2026 from the Communist Party of Iran (Marxist-Leninist, Maoist) who base themselves on the new communism developed by the revolutionary leader Bob Avakian, called on people not to choose between oppressors of this same system of capitalism-imperialism, but to fight for a liberating revolution opposing both the Islamic fascist regime of Iran and the U.S. imperialists: 

    We will bury the murderous Khamenei and the entire theocratic, plundering, misogynistic, freedom-murdering system of the Islamic Republic of Iran!

    We will break down the prison doors! Prisons are no place for the masses of people. Instead, we will hold the Supreme Leader and the Islamic Republic’s political, security, military leaders, and economic plunderers in prison!

    We will destroy the project that the fascist Trump, genocidal Netanyahu, and their Iranian minions have for the future of Iran!

    Together with the people of the world, we will fight to emancipate humanity from all these enemies of humankind and nature!

    This is an uprising against fascist tyranny and torture chambers, bitter oppression and poverty, the medieval oppression of women, the systematic discrimination against religious, ethnic, and national minorities, and the suppression of speech, thought and art.

    To take one dimension of this, millions of Iranians yearn for a country where women are no longer enslaved by the IRI’s system of gender apartheid, subject to the dictates of patriarchy—in public and family life. Videos of the protests have been full of women tearing off their forced hijab (veil), and lighting their cigarettes on burning images of Khamenei (women smoking in public is highly stigmatized). In Iran, misogyny is the law of the land: women’s testimony receives less weight than men’s; men can prevent their wives from holding jobs or traveling abroad; women cannot sing alone in public or attend many men’s sporting events; and violence against women often goes unpunished. On top of this, being LGBT is illegal, and sentences for same-sex relations include flogging and even death.

    Trump Seems to Back Off Threat of Attack, but the Danger Still Looms

    As we reported last week, after the uprising in Iran first broke out, Trump threatened Iran’s rulers that if they killed protesters, the U.S. would attack: “We are locked and loaded and ready to go.” 

    Then, after the Islamic Republic announced it would not execute any protesters (at least for now), Trump seemed to reverse course. In the wake of the Islamic Republic’s mass slaughter of protesters, Trump praised the regime for halting the public executions that it had threatened, basically claiming it as a “win” for his bullying. “Iran canceled the hanging of over 800 people. They were going to hang over 800 people yesterday,” Trump said. “And I greatly respect the fact that they canceled that.” He even repeated some of the IRI talking points, saying that protesters had been firing at regime forces and killed hundreds of them--i.e., they were “terrorists”—so the IRI was justified in clamping down.

    But whether Trump is actually backing off these threats or not is extremely uncertain. On January 15, Trump’s press spokesperson said that “all options” remain on the table in Iran. Meanwhile, the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln and its strike group are heading toward the Persian Gulf and an additional dozen American fighter jets have arrived in Jordan over the past 24 hours. In response to Trump's threats, the Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian tweeted a warning that a strike against Khamenei would amount to a full-scale war with Iran.

    If Trump does go ahead with an attack on Iran, this would not only bring down extreme suffering on the people of Iran, it would create even greater danger in the whole region of the Middle East. There's a whole other dimension in which Iran is a key potential prize in the brewing global conflict involving the major nuclear armed powers of U.S., China and Russia. One or another of these powers could end up seeing vital interests at stake in not backing down. In this way, such an attack could start as one thing and, intentionally or not, erupt into a much wider, more destructive and more all-engulfing conflict.

    Such a war would not only be opposed to the interests of humanity, it poses the real threat of human extinction. Trump, this egomaniacal fascist lunatic, is walking around with his finger on the nuclear trigger.

    The Protests Continue from the Rooftops... Even as the Future Is Uncertain

    It is very difficult to know precisely what is happening in Iran today due to the butcher regime’s media, cellphone and internet blackout. The New York Times is reporting that there have not been any large scale protests since January 11. So it is possible that the uprising may have been suppressed for the moment. Though even in darkness, there seem to be outbursts of protest through the night. Video from January 15 posted on the instagram from Burn the Cage, a movement to free Iran's political prisoners, shows a nighttime protest with call and response from the rooftops: "Death to Dictator. Khamenei is a butcher. We will bury you and drag you down. Like what people did during the Shah." (The Shah of Iran was a U.S.-backed tyrant who was overthrown in 1979.)

    People in the U.S. have a special responsibility to stay alert: opposing Trump's fascist aggression on Iran and the world, and standing with the people of Iran courageously rising up. And people in the U.S., and around the world, have a responsibility to grapple with the questions posed by the new communists with the Communist Party of Iran, Marxist-Leninist Maoist

    Will another oppressive regime ride in to replace this one atop the wounded bodies of the people? Or, by spreading social understanding of what a real revolution is, will the overthrow of the IRI pave the way for a real revolution, replaced not by another oppressive and exploitative regime, but by a new socialist republic? Now, the overthrow of the IRI is on the immediate agenda—but the even more vitally important challenge is how this question gets answered.

    See: From Atash/Fire, Communist Party of Iran, Marxist-Leninist-Maoist—The Islamic Republic Must Go!

    Down with the Islamic Republic on Iran!
    No U.S./Israeli Attack on Iran!
    In the name of humanity, we refuse to accept a fascist America!
    This whole system is rotten and illegitimate! We need and we demand: a whole new way to live, a fundamentally different system!
  • ARTICLE:

    From the International Emergency Campaign to Free Iran’s Political Prisoners Now

    Fight to Stand with Iran’s Prisoners in Grave Danger Amid Reported Massacre of Protesters 

    Revcom.us editors’ note: We received the following from the International Emergency Campaign to Free Iran’s Political Prisoners Now (IEC). Translations are improved mechanical translations. 

    This brief round-up was written on January 17. More information continues to reach the world in bits given an almost total internet blackout by Iran’s regime since January 8. We are currently limited to sharing some verifiable links to give a glimpse into the situation among prisoners amid the protests that began December 28, 2025 in Iran. Reports are that severe repression throughout Iran took place this past week. Follow Burn The Cage on IG for timely updates in Farsi, using translation tools to read and share, and stay tuned to future reports from our campaign about the situation of the political prisoners as we learn more in the coming days.

    Thousands of protesters dance around fire in Iran, January 9, 2026.

     

    Burn the Cage: “Moments after this beautiful Kurdish dance, the young people—peacefully holding hands and dancing together in the street—were met with gunfire. They were shot, wounded, and killed.” January 9, Tehran.     Photo: AP/screengrab

    Burn The Cage reposted this video of the aftermath of the regime’s deliberate burning of the main market in Rasht, a major city in northern Iran, preventing firefighters from arriving so as to corral and massacre protesters who had taken over streets. Witnesses reported that tanks shelled the protesters in multiple locations and the dead were so numerous that heavy machinery was used to transport them. To retrieve their dead, grieving families were forced to pay large sums of money for “bullet costs” or sign statements that the victims were killed by protesters. Video: reposted by Burn The Cage.

    “No to Execution Tuesdays continue, even in total darkness”

    In recent weeks, Iran’s prisoners seem to be unable to publish their weekly statement from the “No to Execution Tuesdays” hunger strike campaign, which is now about to complete its second year of continuous weekly prison protest. Political prisoner Ahmadreza Haeri in Ghezel Hesar prison is one of few prisoners able to communicate with the outside world recently. On Tuesday, January 13, issued the following statement, excerpted here:

    Today is Tuesday, January 13, 2026, and the 103rd week of the “No to Execution Tuesdays” campaign; a week that is being held under unprecedented and horrific conditions: a complete digital and communication blackout throughout Iran…In such circumstances, we are unable to communicate with the members of the campaign. However, aware of the continued collective will of political and ideological prisoners, and with faith in the history of this campaign, we are publishing this statement on their behalf and to ensure that this chain of resistance is not broken… We declare our full solidarity with the protesting people, the grieving families, the political and conscience prisoners, and all those who are fighting to survive and be seen in this organized blackout. The “No to Execution Tuesdays” campaign has always declared that executions are not a means of revenge, but a tool of the government to create fear, suppress protests, and break society. Today, this truth has been exposed more than ever.

    No to Execution Tuesdays continue, even in total darkness.

    Grave Danger to Detainees Amid Blackout

    On January 14, 35 civil rights organizations, including the Free Narges Coalition, PEN America, and the Center for Human Rights in Iran, and Kurdish, Baloch and Azerbaijani groups signed a statement calling urgent attention to the grave risks to prisoners, whose ranks have swelled with at least 22,000 new arrestees:

    Both recent and long-standing detainees—including human rights defenders, journalists, writers, and artists—face an acute and often overlooked risk. Past patterns in Iran demonstrate that periods of widespread unrest are accompanied by heightened abuses inside detention facilities, where these groups are particularly vulnerable to extrajudicial killing, enforced disappearance, torture, and other forms of ill-treatment. Those held in solitary confinement and denied contact with the outside world are at especially high risk… [E]very hour of inaction increases the risk of irreversible loss of human life and gross violations of human rights.

    Day of Grassroots Solidarity

    In a situation that continues to be fluid in Iran, the upcoming day of solidarity with Iran’s prison and street rebels take on added urgency—to stand with the Iranian people and against Iran’s regime as well as imperialist threats/moves. 

    Download the following flyer.

    Poster for San Francisco Iran Vigil and film showing

     

    On JANUARY 28, 2026, the International Emergency Campaign to Free Iran’s Political Prisoners Now (IEC) together with the Unitarian Universalists of San Francisco Human Rights Working Group (HRWG) invite you to 

    Stand With Iran’s Rebels & Against U.S.-Israel War Threats/Moves on Iran! Free Iran’s Political Prisoners Now!

    With an 8-9 AM VIGIL and a 6-9 PM FILM SHOWING—INSIDE THE IRANIAN UPRISING (2022)

    1187 Franklin Street, San Francisco, CA

    These are special events to mark what would be the culmination of the 104th week of the courageous “No to Execution Tuesdays” weekly hunger strike by thousands of prisoners in scores of prisons across Iran. These selfless and brave prisoner rebels are the conscience of the society and call to us.

    Iran’s theocratic regime executed over 2,000 prisoners in 2025, the most in 20 years, and is now conducting brutal round-ups and street executions amid a new, sustained mass uprising since December 28, 2025. As of January 14th, over 2,400 people have been reported to have been killed, thousands injured, and at least ten thousand in custody under horrific conditions. The situation is unfolding as we write. Letters from prisoners vow to continue their struggle amid all this.

    On January 28 we will stand with those who are bravely standing up in Iran’s prisons and protesting in the streets for a better world. Their struggle is our struggle.

    As people living in the U.S. we have a special responsibility to oppose the vicious war threats by fascist Trump against Iran, which can only bring more suffering to the people there. In June 2025, Israel and the U.S. bombed Iran in an unprovoked attack. They bombed Evin prison which houses most of Iran’s political prisoners! Trump's latest threat to attack Iran to “save its peaceful protesters” is very serious, and could potentially lead to a regional or even world conflagration. No one should forget that the U.S. has shown it will use nukes on civilians, as they did in Japan. The U.S. has over 5,000 nukes!

    We will mark this moment with two events: 

    • On the morning of Wednesday, January 28, at Franklin and Geary Streets in San Francisco from 8-9 AM the UUSF weekly vigil. Bring signs and banners that express solidarity with Iran’s prisoners and protesters, and opposition to U.S.-Israel war threats.
    • Later that evening from 6-9 PM, we’ll show the PBS Frontline documentary “Inside the Iranian Uprising,” in the UUSF’s TSK room about the powerful 2022 Woman, Life, Freedom uprising. It is both timely and relevant as millions rise up in Iran to demand an end to the whole oppressive regime—versus battling against one atrocity after another. 

    Urgent questions about the future of Iran, the region, and the world pose themselves to people of conscience. 

    After the film there will be solidarity statements, a brief Q & A session, and community mingling. (Send statements to freeiranspoliticalprisonersnow@gmail.com.)

    From diverse political perspectives, we treasure our unity in our common cause for justice: We demand of the Islamic Republic of Iran: FREE ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS NOW! We say to the US government: NO THREATS OR WAR MOVES AGAINST IRAN! LIFT SANCTIONS!

    More info: FreeIransPoliticalPrisonersNow@gmail.com or humanrights@uusf.org

    To donate for the event, send checks or money orders payable to International Emergency Campaign to Free Iran's Political Prisoners Now, 18601 N. Hwy 1 #212, Fort Bragg, CA 96437

    Lastly, watch this powerful statement by Miles Solay of the band Outernational on January 15. His caption sums it up with moral and political clarity: “Full support to the righteous uprising in Iran to overthrow the fascist dark ages Islamic Republic. Free all political prisoners in Iran now! NO TO ALL USA AND ISRAELI intervention, attacks. The fascist regime of Donald Trump is no friend to the people of the world.”

  • ARTICLE:

    From Atash/Fire, Communist Party of Iran, Marxist-Leninist-Maoist

    The Islamic Republic Must Go!

    Revcom.us editors' note: This is an editorial from Atash/Fire, journal of the Communist Party of Iran, Marxist-Leninist-Maoist, www.cpimlm.org, posted on January 7, 2026, on the mass upsurge now rocking Iran. It was translated by revcom.us volunteers. Bracketed words or phrases were added for clarification.

    We will bury the murderous Khamenei and the entire theocratic, plundering, misogynistic, freedom-murdering system of the Islamic Republic of Iran!

    We will break down the prison doors! Prisons are no place for the masses of people. Instead, we will hold the Supreme Leader and the Islamic Republic’s political, security, military leaders, and economic plunderers in prison!

    We will destroy the project that the fascist Trump, genocidal Netanyahu, and their Iranian minions have for the future of Iran!   

    Together with the people of the world, we will fight to emancipate humanity from all these enemies of humankind and nature!

     

    THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN (IRI) MUST GO!

    Now, the roar of anger from 47 years of suffering, poverty, and repression is reverberating throughout Iran. Countless people have stood in an unequal and furious battle, facing the oppressors, fearless of death, crying out for life and liberation. The children of this country have come to the fore demanding to survive and to live a meaningful life fit for human beings. They have pledged their lives as collateral for this liberation, and their blood is flowing in the streets. These sacrifices will never be forgotten, and these crimes will not go unanswered.

    The revolutionary overthrow of the IRI is an urgent need of the majority of our society: a revolution that uproots the entire system of the IRI and builds a fundamentally different political, economic, and social system that will serve the immediate and long-term interests of our oppressed and exploited people; a revolution that will crush these criminals and their entire economic, bureaucratic, and military apparatus, a revolution that will sweep away poverty and oppression by relying on the wisdom, enthusiasm, power, and participation of all the people; a revolution that does not allow the work of millions of people, the resources of this land, and people’s daily lives to be monopolized and controlled by a mega-capitalist minority (Islamic or non-Islamic) and their imperialist masters, who keep things functioning in the same old way. No! We will not allow that!

    The revolutionary overthrow of the IRI is urgently needed: A revolution that tears down prison doors and frees the captured fighters, and so that their strength, courage and consciousness can broaden and build the revolution and a fundamentally different and new socialist system. Prison is not the place for these loved ones. Prison is the place for Khamenei [the “Supreme Leader” of Iran] and the IRI's political, security, military, and economic plunderers to be held accountable according to the most advanced and progressive rules of procedure after the establishment of the future socialist system.

    The revolutionary overthrow of the IRI is our immediate agenda: But we will not allow the evildoers of the “Pahlavi Project" [Reza Pahlavi is the son of former U.S.-backed Shah (absolute monarch). See Atash article: A “Project” Named Reza Pahlavi!: Manufacturing an Imperialist Alternative vs. Revolutionary Overthrow of the Islamic Republic!] with the support of the fascist Trump and the genocidal Netanyahu, to take the place of the fascist Islamists and dictate and impose a program on society that is essentially no different from the IRI and has nothing to do with the basic needs of our people—which have been the driving force behind this current uprising. We will not allow the security apparatus and repression of the IRI to be replaced by the security apparatus and repression of SAVAK [the brutal secret police under the Shah]—whether in cahoots with the Basij and the IRGC [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps; Basij are a paramilitary force under it] or under the leadership of the Mossad [Israel’s brutal secret police]—which would put chains on the youth of this country, and repeat a history of enslavement. 

    The revolutionary overthrow of the IRI is urgently needed: But we will not allow Trump, the fascist president of the United States, to determine our fate and to exploit our struggles against the IRI for his unbridled imperialism, leaving our society trapped in the web of imperialist relations that is at the root of our current misery. 

    The revolutionary overthrow of the IRI is urgently needed: But at this critical and dangerous moment, we will not allow various types of “reformists” and those who wistfully dream of “change,” whether in or out of government—who fear the anger and just struggle of the people and have for decades called for “peace” and promoted compromise with the inhumane IRI regime—to control, manage and misdirect.

    The IRI is a fascist and outmoded theocratic regime, based on a capitalist foundation, and dependent on the [global] capitalist-imperialist system. Inevitably, and inherently, its survival has been based on plundering people's livelihoods, on the reactionary legal framework of Islamic law, on economic, political and cultural injustices against the people, on repression, imprisonment and execution, on suppression of freedom of thought, on suppression of science, on national oppression and misogyny, on destruction of the environment, and is now hated by the absolute majority of the Iranian people—in other words, zero “legitimacy”! Today, a minority of these people are standing up, risking their lives to put an end to this regime. This force must grow and put the IRI under a nationwide siege of the people. However, this movement is walking on a razor’s edge: it knows what it doesn't want, but “What We Want and How We Will Get It” is dangerously vague and ambiguous in people's minds. 

    Will another oppressive regime ride in to replace this one atop the wounded bodies of the people? Or, by spreading social understanding of what a real revolution is, will the overthrow of the IRI pave the way for a real revolution, replaced not by another oppressive and exploitative regime, but by a new socialist republic? Now, the overthrow of the IRI is on the immediate agenda—but the even more vitally important challenge is how this question gets answered.

     

    Communist Party of Iran (Marxist-Leninist, Maoist) — www.cpimlm.org

    January 7, 2026

  • ARTICLE:

    The Lie of Trump’s Gaza Ceasefire

    Genocidal Slaughter, Blockades and Gaza Concentration Camps

    Updated

    Editor’s Note: On January 15, the Trump regime announced that it was moving into “Phase 2” of Trump’s so-called “Peace Plan” for ending the slaughter in Gaza. As a first step, it named a 15-member committee of Palestinian technocrats (political administrators and experts) who would direct the day-to-day governing of Gaza, under the supervision of a “Board of Peace for Gaza,” which Trump himself would head. While Trump threatens war throughout the world, after having backed a full-on genocide of the Palestinian people, the hypocrisy of this is staggering. The initial members of this Board were also announced, with others presumably named later. A U.S. general was also named who would oversee the military occupation of Gaza. 

    Revcom.us has analyzed (October 6, 2025) that Trump’s Gaza “Peace Plan” is a plan for “Erasing Palestinian Rights, Locking in Israel’s Genocide, Deepening U.S. Domination and Plunder.” 

    This week we’re reposting analysis from December 2025, which exposes the ongoing genocide taking place in the framework of Trump’s peace plan, including some of the heinous U.S.-Israeli plans being considered for “rebuilding” Gaza under “Phase 2” of the plan. 

    The ceasefire risks creating a dangerous illusion that life in Gaza is returning to normal. But while Israeli authorities and forces have reduced the scale of their attacks and allowed limited amounts of humanitarian aid into Gaza, the world must not be fooled. Israel’s genocide is not over.
    —Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International

    Nearly two months ago, Israel and Hamas1 agreed to Trump’s 20-point “Peace Plan” and a ceasefire. Last month, the United Nations Security Council approved a U.S.-sponsored resolution endorsing this plan.2 By then all the living Israeli hostages held by Hamas had been freed, meeting a key requirement of the ceasefire.

    But the ethnic cleansing and vicious oppression and terror being brought down on the Palestinian people has continued, even as this is getting less and less worldwide attention.

    Israel is still:

    * Killing: Israel’s military continues to bombard Gaza—from land, air and sea.

    At least 366 Palestinians have been killed and another 938 injured since October 11, when the ceasefire took effect.3 Israel’s ongoing killing spree also spreads terror across Gaza, and makes life, reconstruction, and aid deliveries much more difficult if not impossible. 

    Israel firebombs refugee camps, destroying tents and burning alive people inside them. And they have repeatedly used drones to kill people for crossing an arbitrarily drawn and often invisible "yellow line" (these are areas from which the Israeli army operates).

    This past week, two children—brothers Fadi and Juma Abu Assi, 8 and 10 years old—were killed by an Israeli drone as they gathered firewood for their father, who is disabled. 

    In an official statement, the Israeli army said these children were "suspects" who "conducted suspicious activities on the ground, and approached [Israeli] troops operating in the southern Gaza Strip, posing an immediate threat to them." They continued that the Israeli army "eliminated the suspects in order to remove the threat."

    The threat?! These were unarmed children collecting firewood so they could eat a warm meal! 

    Upon receiving their dead bodies, their father said, trembling: "I removed the shroud and hugged them. My little Juju's head was blown off... His arms were severed and parts of his torso were gone." He added that "Fadi's right hand and left leg were cut off."

    * Blockading: Israel continues to blockade urgently needed food, medicine and other aid—even infant formula. Instead of the 600 trucks a day promised by Trump’s plan, Israel is allowing in only 220 daily, while some 6,000 trucks loaded with enough aid for three months wait at the border. Israel finally opened the Rafah crossing into Egypt—the only crossing open to the world and not leading into Israeli territory. But Israel opened it only for Palestinians leaving Gaza, not the thousands wanting to come back in.

    Men walk by destroyed apartment buildings at the Al-Shati camp in Gaza City, November 18, 2025.

     

    Apartment buildings destroyed by Israeli attacks at the Al-Shati camp in Gaza City, November 18, 2025.    Photo: AP

    * Freezing: Israel is still blocking tents, mobile homes and other housing from entering Gaza, denying Palestinians adequate shelter, even as a harsh winter is upon them. 

    * Destroying: Israel is continuing to occupy growing swaths of Gaza and to destroy and level whole neighborhoods, leaving more and more Palestinians with no homes to return to.

    No Change in Israel’s Genocidal Intent, No Change in Trump's Genocidal Support 

    Trump and his fascist counterpart in Israel—led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (aka Netan-Nazi)—continue to work closely together. And while they do have real tactical differences on various issues, the U.S. continues to pour huge amounts of political and military support into backing Israel's military death machine. 

    In fact, on December 1, Trump and Netanyahu reportedly spoke by phone. According to Netanyahu’s Office, they reaffirmed their joint “commitment to disarming Hamas and demilitarizing the Gaza Strip,” this as Israel drops U.S.-made bombs on Gaza.4

    Amnesty International sums up: “Israeli authorities are still committing genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip, by continuing to deliberately inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction, without signaling any change in their intent.”5 (Emphasis added)

    It warns, “The ceasefire must not become a smokescreen for Israel’s ongoing genocide.” 

    Yet that’s what it’s become, with Israel’s atrocities barely making the mainstream news, if they are covered at all. 

    U.S. “Housing Solution” for Gaza = The Promise of Israeli Concentration Camps

    Children in makeshift camp for displaced people in the central Gaza Strip, November 18, 2025.

     

    Children in makeshift camp for displaced people in central Gaza Strip, November 18, 2025.    Photo: AP/Abdel Kareem Hana

    Shelter is one of the most urgent needs people have in Gaza. Israel has systematically—and criminally—damaged or destroyed 84 percent of all structures, including completely destroying over 60 percent of its housing units. Today, 1.7 million Palestinians—over 80 percent of Gaza's population, is displaced and forced to live in tents or makeshift shelters. Especially now, with winter's freezing rains, they’re barely habitable, if habitable at all. 

    If this were a real ceasefire, Israel would end its bombardments and open Gaza’s borders. This would allow the UN and other aid agencies to flood the territory with the equipment and supplies they have at the ready. It would enable the Palestinian people, with all their creativity, determination and experience, to build livable temporary shelters and then begin the process of reconstruction. 

    But Israel’s objectives and the Trump plan have never been about helping the Palestinian people, much less respecting their fundamental rights and humanity. They’ve always been about suppressing and subordinating—even eliminating—the Palestinian population and ensuring U.S. imperialist domination of the Middle East, and Israel’s dominance of historic Palestine, and military dominance in the region overall. 

    As a result, virtually no reconstruction has taken place in Gaza. Why? Because of Israel’s ongoing attacks and blockade, and because the Trump plan gives Palestinians no authority to govern their own land, determine their own future, or protect themselves from Israel’s murderous assaults. So the U.S.-sponsored UN resolution calls for disarming all Palestinians and “demilitarizing” Gaza (except of course for Israel and forces chosen by Trump) before any construction can be authorized there. 

    Map of Gaza showing areas red and green

     

    Gaza. The U.S. has reportedly decided to begin building in the so-called “Green Zone,” the area that’s been seized, occupied, and violently cleared of Palestinians by Israel. The so-called “Red Zone” to the west, which over two million Palestinians have been forced into, would be left to rot for the time being.   

    What the U.S. has reportedly decided to do is begin building new, temporary housing in the so-called “Green Zone.” That’s the 53-58 percent of eastern and southern Gaza that’s been seized and occupied by Israel, cleared of nearly all Palestinians, largely razed to the ground, and is now policed by the genocidal Israeli army.

    The so-called “Red Zone” to the west, where over two million Palestinians have been forced into, would be left to rot for the time being.6 

    All the details of this plan have yet to be decided on or released, but it’s not hard to see how it could lay the groundwork for new genocidal outrages:

    • There are reports that Israel will only allow in "well vetted" people—with no ties to Hamas. But Israel has a long history of claiming people have ties to Hamas to set them up for assassination or imprisonment and torture, providing zero proof—from journalists, doctors, aid workers and on and on. This provides a political pretext to only allow in people who will collaborate with Israel.
    • Would Palestinians be allowed to leave, for example to see family members, or are they to be locked into a concentration camp disguised as a housing development?
    • Would Palestinians trying to enter be detained or imprisoned?
    • Would the whole operation turn into the kind of killing field that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s aid stations did? (See box on new CNN exposure of mass graves.)
    • By refusing to rebuild in the “Red Zone,” where well over 90 percent of the Palestinian population is living, is this a means for forcing a mass exodus from Gaza?
    • Does this plan open the door to a permanent Israeli occupation, or annexation of over half of Gaza and perhaps “repopulate” it with Israeli settlers?

    What's Driving This?

    On October 7, 2023, Hamas launched a reactionary attack on Israel which included the targeting of civilians. some 1,200 people were killed and some 250 taken as hostages. In response, Israel launched a full-scale genocide aimed at the Palestinian people as a whole. 

    In the two years plus, Israel has murdered at least 70,117 people, including at least 20,179 children. At least 170,999 people have been injured. And these numbers do not include the thousands still buried under the bombed buildings and ash. Israel obliterated the entire infrastructure of Gaza, leaving only trauma, terror and rubble—schools, hospitals, mosques and churches, libraries... all gone.

    In November 2023, revcom.us spoke to why this was happening: 

     

    Netanyahu (aka Netan-Nazi) and Israel’s rulers are seizing on Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel—which included the war crimes of taking hostages and the murder of civilians—to attempt a “final solution” to the “Palestinian problem.” This means, at a minimum, reducing the Palestinians to such a state that they can no longer pose any obstacle to Israel’s objectives. Beyond that, it could mean mass expulsion and/or slaughter on a massive scale, beyond even what Israel is now carrying out.

    This is what has continued to unfold—in new and horrific ways. And because the U.S. system of capitalism-imperialism requires Israel as a military and political outpost in the strategic region of the Middle East—the rulers of this system have continued to back and fund and support Israel's open genocidal slaughter.

    Trump’s Fascist, Imperialist “Peace Plan” Must Be Opposed

    To maintain the cover of stability, Trump is insisting that his “peace plan” is moving ahead, despite problems (including Israeli airstrikes), into Phase 2, and that he plans to announce his “Board of Peace” before Christmas. This is the board—with Trump himself at the head—that would assume total control of Gaza, and eventually—supposedly—replace Israeli forces with an international stabilization force. Whether this will actually come to pass is impossible to know with certainty.

    However, people should recall that in 2001, the U.S. invaded and occupied Afghanistan, promising to liberate its people, end “terrorism,” and build a new society. In 2003, it invaded Iraq, promising to create a liberated, “democratic” Iraq. These grandiose promises and real plans of the U.S. imperialists failed abysmally, while costing hundreds of thousands of Afghans and nearly a million Iraqis their lives. 

    What we can say with certainty about the current situation in Gaza, and which revcom.us has previously exposed HERE and HERE, is that Trump’s is a thoroughly reactionary, predatory plan which represents a further assault on the Palestinian people, a further bolstering of the genocidal Israeli state, and a further and deeper U.S. intervention into the Middle East.

    End Israel’s Blockade of Gaza!
    Stop the U.S.-Israeli Genocide of the Palestinian People
    This whole system is rotten and illegitimate! We need and we demand: a whole new way to live, a fundamentally different system!

    CNN Exposé: Israel Slaughtered Palestinians Seeking Aid—Then Bulldozed Their Bodies into Mass Graves

    The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) was created by the U.S. and Israel supposedly to bring food and other needed aid to the Palestinian people. In reality, the “aid hubs” of this now defunct Foundation turned into killing grounds, where between 2,000 and 3,000 Palestinians were gunned down, and another 19,000 were wounded, as they desperately sought food. 

    A CNN investigation has now revealed not only that the Israeli military indiscriminately fired on starving Palestinians collecting food at a GHF aid distribution site near the Zikim crossing in June 2025, but it then bulldozed their bodies into shallow, unmarked graves. Some bodies were left exposed for days to decompose or be partially eaten by dogs. All had been buried without IDs or records of who they were. You can see CNN’s full report here.

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. Hamas is a reactionary Islamic fundamentalist organization which has been the governing power in Gaza since 2007.  [back]

    2. For background on Trump’s plan and the UN’s resolution, see, Trump’s Gaza “Peace Plan”: Erasing Palestinian Rights, Locking in Israel’s Genocide, Deepening U.S. Domination and Plunder, revcom.us, October 6, 2025; Trump Regime Demands Israel Adhere to Its Imperialist “Peace” Plan - Palestinians in Gaza Still Suffering from the Horrors of U.S.-Israeli Genocide, revcom.us, October 27, 2025; UN Shamefully Rubber Stamps Trump’s Fascist Gaza “Peace Plan” —Israel Continues Its Killing Spree, revcom.us, November 24, 2025. [back]

    3. CNN Finds Israel Killed Palestinian Aid Seekers and Bulldozed Bodies into Shallow, Unmarked Graves, Democracy Now!, December 5, 2025. [back]

    4. “It is unclear if there has been any progress on efforts to demilitarize Gaza [and install an International Stabilization Force to manage security], which Israeli and American officials believe would cement a long-term cease-fire,” the New York Times reports. “Israel's opposition to Turkish deployment [in Gaza] is causing potential partners such as Pakistan and Azerbaijan to hesitate, putting the US scheme at risk,” according to the Middle East Eye. [back]

    5. Overall, Israel’s military operations have “significantly undermined every pillar of survival” in Gaza, according to a new report from the UN, causing Gaza’s entire population of 2.3 million to suffer “extreme, multidimensional impoverishment,” and threatening a total economic collapse. [back]

    6. See, US military planning for divided Gaza with ‘green zone’ secured by international and Israeli troops, Guardian, November 14, 2025; Sari Bashi, Gaza: The Threat of Partition, the New York Review of BooksNovember 23, 2025; U.S. Plans Compounds to House Palestinians in Israeli-Held Half of Gaza, New York Times, November 25, 2025. [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    Some Crucial Points of Revolutionary Orientation — in Opposition to Infantile Posturing and Distortions of Revolution

    Updated

    Revolution is a very serious matter and must be approached in a serious and scientific way, and not through subjective and individualistic expressions of frustration, posturing and acts which run counter to the development of a mass revolutionary movement which is aimed at—and which must be characterized by means that are fundamentally consistent with and serve to bring into being—a radically different and far better world. Revolution, and in particular communist revolution, is and can only be the act of masses of people, organized and led to carry out increasingly conscious struggle to abolish, and advance humanity beyond, all systems and relations of exploitation and oppression.

    A bedrock, scientific understanding which must underlie the development of such a revolutionary movement is that:

    The whole system we now live under is based on exploitation—here and all over the world. It is completely worthless and no basic change for the better can come about until this system is overthrown.

    And that:

    In a country like the U.S., the revolutionary overthrow of this system can only be achieved once there is a major, qualitative change in the nature of the objective situation, such that society as a whole is in the grip of a profound crisis, owing fundamentally to the nature and workings of the system itself, and along with that there is the emergence of a revolutionary people, numbering in the millions and millions, conscious of the need for revolutionary change and determined to fight for it. In this struggle for revolutionary change, the revolutionary people and those who lead them will be confronted by the violent repressive force of the machinery of the state which embodies and enforces the existing system of exploitation and oppression; and in order for the revolutionary struggle to succeed, it will need to meet and defeat that violent repressive force of the old, exploitative and oppressive order.

    Before the development of a revolutionary situation—and as the key to working toward the development of a revolutionary people, in a country like the U.S.—those who see the need for and wish to contribute to a revolution must focus their efforts on raising the political and ideological consciousness of masses of people and building massive political resistance to the main ways in which, at any given time, the exploitative and oppressive nature of this system is concentrated in the policies and actions of the ruling class and its institutions and agencies—striving through all this to enable growing numbers of people to grasp both the need and the possibility for revolution when the necessary conditions have been brought into being, as a result of the unfolding of the contradictions of the system itself as well as the political, and ideological, work of revolutionaries.

    In the absence of a revolutionary situation—and in opposition to the revolutionary orientation and revolutionary political and ideological work that is actually needed—the initiation of, or the advocacy of, isolated acts of violence, by individuals or small groups, divorced from masses of people and attempting to substitute for a revolutionary movement of masses of people, is very wrong and extremely harmful. Even—or especially—if this is done in the name of “revolution,” it will work against, and in fact do serious damage to, the development of an actual revolutionary movement of masses of people, as well as to the building of political resistance against the outrages and injustices of this system even before there is a revolutionary situation. It will aid the extremely repressive forces of the existing system in their moves to isolate, attack and crush those, both revolutionary forces and broader forces of political opposition, who are working to build mass political resistance and to achieve significant, and even profound, social change through the politically-conscious activity and initiative of masses of people.

     

  • ARTICLE:

    Digging into the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, by Bob Avakian

    How Would the Revolution Deal with Relations with Other Countries?

    The outrageous and criminal invasion of Venezuela on January 3, 2026—along with the threadbare imperialist justifications for it, the murders that led to it, and Trump’s bragging threat that “we’re going to run it”—drives home the imperialist character of the system that has basically ruled this country since the late 1800s. But what is that system? Could humanity ever rise beyond it? What could replace it—and how would it work?

    On the basis of this country's founding in genocide and slavery, it has committed endless war crimes and crimes against humanity in maintaining its rule. Watch this from the revolutionary leader, Bob Avakian, from 2017, where he outlines a whole series of similar crimes committed by those who rule and represent this system—very similar to what Trump & Co. are doing now to Venezuela. Or look at the highly condensed summary of just a portion of the crimes we dig into in the American Crimes section of this site.

    Many politicians have promised “peace” (even Trump, a war-mongering fascist, tries to make the outrageous claim he's the "President of Peace"). But we live under the system of capitalism-imperialism. And that has meaning for whoever runs it.

    Break with American Chauvinism: The U.S. Is NOT a Force for Good in the World (from@BobAvakianOfficial).

    Capitalism-imperialism compels a handful of “developed” capitalist countries to dominate, distort and parasitically suck the blood from the vast majority of the world’s people. Capitalism-imperialism—in its compulsive, competition-driven requirement for ever more profit—means that millions of children in Asia, Africa and Latin America die each year from preventable disease, hunger, or both. Capitalism-imperialism compels wars to dominate the oppressed nations of the world, and wars between imperialist powers to sit atop that domination. Today even the “liberal-imperialist” New York Times demands that the U.S. military catch up with, match and be able to overpower its rival China—including in the ability to wield and use nuclear weapons. This system is built on cut-throat competition and rivalry… on expand-or-die… and that finds concentrated expression on the international level.

    The human cost is staggering. Just since the end of World War II, the U.S. military has killed roughly 10 million people. Count the dead from Korea, Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia… count the dead from Guatemala, Chile, and El Salvador… from Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Indonesia and Gaza… from Congo and Mozambique… and you will find death either carried out by, sponsored, or funded by America. And whoever ascends to the top of that system—whether Democrat or MAGA fascist—will move to deepen that exploitation and carry out the aggression necessary to sustain and defend it.

    Trump—as a fascist—does this in a way with no regard for international or even U.S. law and in a particularly murderous (and dangerous) way. But he does this as a servant of the same capitalist-imperialist system that Biden and Obama also served.

    Constitution Serving the Emancipation of ALL Humanity

    But this isn’t the only way the world can be. This horror can and must end. Not just the particularly gangsteresque rule of Trump, but the whole imperialist system in this country and everything that flows from it. The technology and knowledge exist to organize society on a radically different foundation: getting to a world without exploitation and oppression. This is the goal of communism.7 The Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, written by Bob Avakian, contains the sweeping vision, firm foundation and concrete blueprint for a socialist society that is in transition to this communist world: emancipating humanity from all forms and relations of exploitation and oppression, and from the ignorance and selfishness required and perpetuated by systems based on exploitation.

    Bob Avakian on Why He Wrote the CONSTITUTION for the New Socialist Republic in North America

    The new state power based on this Constitution can only be brought into being through a revolution involving millions in which the old machinery of exploitation, domination and oppression is not just reformed but abolished. 

    This series of articles will focus on how the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America lays out the framework for how this new power would transform the relations between the U.S. and that vast majority of the world that it has up to now plundered, oppressed, repressed and waged war upon. The new socialist state power will do that on the basis of a radically different economic and political system, and a struggle to forge whole new relations among people.

    Internationalism: Fundamental to the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America

    The Preamble of the new Constitution sets out the most fundamental guiding principles of the new power. So it is worth noting that the second paragraph immediately takes up the relation of the New Socialist Republic in North America to the whole world:

    In contrast to the way in which the capitalist-imperialist state serves and enforces the interests of a small ruling group of exploiters, the New Socialist Republic in North America, with the continuing leadership of the Revolutionary Communist Party, bases itself on, and proceeds from, the fundamental interests of those most bitterly exploited and oppressed under the old system, and the masses of people broadly, and provides the means for them to play an increasingly widening role in the exercise of political power and the functioning of society in accordance with those interests–in order to carry forward the struggle to transform society, with the goal of uprooting and finally eliminating all oppressive and exploitative relations among human beings and the destructive antagonistic conflicts to which these relations give rise. 

    This is a process and goal which, fundamentally and in the final analysis, can only be achieved on a global scale, with the advance to communism throughout the world. The orientation and principles of this state, as embodied in this Constitution, are internationalist: While giving due emphasis to meeting the material, intellectual and cultural needs of the people within this state, on a continually expanding basis, and to promoting the further transformation of this society to continue uprooting social inequalities and remaining aspects of exploitation and oppression, the socialist state must give fundamental priority to the advance of the revolutionary struggle, and the final goal of communism, throughout the world, and must adopt and carry out policies and actions which are in accordance with and give concrete effect to this internationalist orientation. 

    This is a political vision and a morality unlike anything else in this society. If you read through the new Constitution with this in mind, you’ll see it take concrete form in many different principles and policies of the new socialist republic.

    BAsics-5-8 English

     

    In regard to where we began this article, what does this new Constitution say about foreign relations? Could such a thing even remotely close to what’s going on in Venezuela happen in a society based on the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America? The answer is no! The U.S. today has roughly 800 military installations in other countries. These bases serve as ways to control the countries that they’re in and to suppress movements of opposition, including revolutionary movements, against regimes that are allied with the U.S. Remember again—10 million, around the world, slaughtered by the U.S. military and related institutions since the end of World War II.

    Yet in a hostile, imperialist-dominated world, there remains a need for defense. Here’s how the New Socialist Republic would approach it:

    1. The basic components and structures of the armed forces and militia and other organs of public defense and security of the New Socialist Republic in North America will have been brought into being through the course of the revolutionary struggle for power, once the conditions for that struggle had emerged: the development of an acute revolutionary crisis and the emergence of a revolutionary people, in the millions and millions, who have the leadership of a revolutionary communist vanguard and are conscious of the need for revolutionary change and determined to fight for it. With the establishment of this Republic, these institutions of public defense and security will be further developed in accordance with their essential purpose and role: to defend and safeguard the New Socialist Republic in North America and the security and rights of its people, in furtherance of the aims of this Republic and in support of the masses of people in carrying forward the revolutionary transformation of society, and contributing as much as possible to this transformation throughout the world. 

    2. In keeping with this purpose and role, and in accordance with its internationalist orientation, the New Socialist Republic in North America will dismantle all remaining bases of the former imperialist USA in other countries and will renounce all treaties and agreements, military and otherwise, which were imposed by that imperialist state on other countries and peoples or which in any case served to impose and enforce the domination of the imperialist USA. The New Socialist Republic in North America renounces all wars of aggression and domination, and all occupation of other countries in pursuit of such domination and aggression, and will not station its forces, nor establish bases, in another country, except in circumstances where this is clearly in accord with the wishes of the masses of people in that country and where such action would actually be a manifestation of the internationalist orientation and other fundamental principles and objectives set forth in this Constitution and would contribute to the advance of revolutionary struggle in the world in accordance with these principles and objectives.

    A Final, Important Point

    The imperialist invasion of Venezuela and the illegal arrest of Nicolás Maduro, along with the press conference announcing this, calls to mind this passage written by Bob Avakian (BA) more than four years ago. Many in the ruling class are already raising that Trump’s move poses the danger of serving to legitimize similar moves by Russia against Ukraine and other eastern European countries and—even more ominous for the rulers—China vis-à-vis Taiwan. Over four years ago, writing of the splits within the ruling class over how to rule—splits which have since sharpened immeasurably—BA wrote the following:

    It is extremely important to deeply understand this:

    As this situation develops, and the ruling class is more and more unable to rule in the old way, society and daily life for masses of people, from different parts of society, can become increasingly unsettled and chaotic, with frequent “disruptions” of the “normal” way things have been.

    And as “the normal way” society has been ruled is failing to hold things together—and society is increasingly being ripped apart—this can shake people’s belief that “the way things have always been” is the only way things can be. It can make people more open to questioning—in a real sense it can force people to question—the way things have been, and whether they have to stay that way. And this is all the more likely to happen if the revolutionary forces are out among the people shining a light on the deeper reality of what is happening, and why, and bringing out that there IS an alternative to living this way.

    At such a time, the real and powerful alternative embodied in the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, by Bob Avakian, needs to get into the bloodstream of society. This does provide, as we said at the start, the sweeping vision, the concrete blueprint and the firm foundation for a whole new way to live… and a fundamentally different system. With society being ripped apart, and revolution more possible—even in the face of fascism, genocide, climate catastrophe and nuclear war—it is urgent that people raise their sights to the radically different world that's possible and take responsibility as part of the larger mission which this Constitution serves—bringing forward real emancipators of humanity.

    Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America (Draft Proposal)

    Authored by Bob Avakian, and adopted by the Central Committee of the Revolutionary Communist Party, USA, 2010

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. Karl Marx, the founder of the science of communism, said that the goal of communist revolution is the abolition of class distinctions generally, or all class distinctions, the abolition of all the relations of productions on which those class distinctions rest, the abolition of all the social relations that correspond to those production relations, and the revolutionizing of all the ideas that correspond to those social relations. These have come to be known as the “four alls.” [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    Digging into the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, by Bob Avakian

    How Would the Revolution Deal with Relations with Other Countries? 

    Part II: Putting the New Economy on an Internationalist Basis

    Introduction: In last week’s issue, we began a short series on how the new socialist state power, founded on and guided by the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, by Bob Avakian (BA), would approach relations with the whole world. See Part 1. We wrote that: 

    “The Preamble of the new Constitution sets out the most fundamental guiding principles of the new power. So it is worth noting that the second paragraph immediately takes up the relation of the New Socialist Republic in North America to the whole world:

    Examples of Global Exploitation

    Some of the 40,000 children in the DRC who dig tunnels and haul rocks from cobalt mines in 2018. Cobalt is an essential mineral for the lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles, laptops and smart phones.

     

    Some of the 40,000 children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo who work in the cobalt mines in 2018. Cobalt is an essential mineral for the lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles, laptops and smart phones.    Photo: CBS YouTube (screengrab)

    Garment factory workers in Bangladesh

     

    The workers at Top Glove factory in Malaysia live in dormitories, 20 to a single room, produce 220 million disposable gloves a day for “roughly $300 a month in salary.” This is a case of how a product essential for protecting the lives of medical personnel who save lives is produced in sweatshops that endanger lives.    Photo: AP

    Women peel shrimp in a tin-roofed processing shed in the hamlet of the Tallarevu, India, February 11, 2024.

     

    Women peel shrimp in a tin-roofed processing shed in the hamlet of the Tallarevu, India, February 11, 2024.    Photo: AP

    In contrast to the way in which the capitalist-imperialist state serves and enforces the interests of a small ruling group of exploiters, the New Socialist Republic in North America, with the continuing leadership of the Revolutionary Communist Party, bases itself on, and proceeds from, the fundamental interests of those most bitterly exploited and oppressed under the old system, and the masses of people broadly, and provides the means for them to play an increasingly widening role in the exercise of political power and the functioning of society in accordance with those interests–in order to carry forward the struggle to transform society, with the goal of uprooting and finally eliminating all oppressive and exploitative relations among human beings and the destructive antagonistic conflicts to which these relations give rise. 

    This is a process and goal which, fundamentally and in the final analysis, can only be achieved on a global scale, with the advance to communism throughout the world. The orientation and principles of this state, as embodied in this Constitution, are internationalist: While giving due emphasis to meeting the material, intellectual and cultural needs of the people within this state, on a continually expanding basis, and to promoting the further transformation of this society to continue uprooting social inequalities and remaining aspects of exploitation and oppression, the socialist state must give fundamental priority to the advance of the revolutionary struggle, and the final goal of communism, throughout the world, and must adopt and carry out policies and actions which are in accordance with and give concrete effect to this internationalist orientation."

    This is a political vision and a morality unlike anything else in this society. It is founded on BA’s basic point that internationalism means that the whole world comes first. This week, Part II focuses on how the new economy will be structured to give that "fundamental priority.” 

    Imagine: A New Economy to Serve a Base Area for World Revolution, Meeting Human Needs and Protecting the Environment

    Article IV of the new Constitution focuses on “The Economy and Economic Development in the New Socialist Republic in North America.” The economy—or the mode of production—forms the basis for every society. So how would the socialist economy differ from the horrible global inequality, plunder and grinding exploitation of today’s capitalist-imperialist mode of production? How would it not just become a more “equitable” division of the spoils of this parasitic system? That will involve struggle, at times quite sharp—and the new Constitution provides the foundation and principles on which to wage that struggle.

    Right up top Article IV states that:

    Social production and economic development are guided and evaluated according to three overarching criteria: 

    1. Advancing the world revolution to uproot all exploitation and oppression and to emancipate all of humanity; 

    2. Meeting social need, creating a common material wealth that contributes to the all-around development of society and the individuals who make it up, and overcoming oppressive divisions between mental and manual labor, town and country, different regions and nationalities, and men and women;

     3. Protecting, preserving, and enhancing the ecosystems and biodiversity of the planet for current and future generations.

    Let’s dig further into that first big goal of advancing the world revolution to uproot all exploitation and oppression, with the crucial Section 9 of Article IV:

    Section 9. The Socialist State as a Base Area for the World Revolution. 

    1. This orientation is built into the state’s economic structures and its planning system and priorities, as well as its capacities to dispatch resources and people to different parts of the world to carry out various internationalist tasks and responsibilities. 

    2. In all international economic relations, proletarian internationalism and the needs of the world revolution come first. 

    3. With other socialist states that exist or come into being, trade will be carried out under the principles of proletarian internationalism, to aid the construction of socialism in these countries and the world revolution. 

    4. With regard to imperialist and reactionary states, the New Socialist Republic in North America will not put economic exchanges and agreements above its responsibility to support revolutionary movements in these countries. 

    5. Trade with nations and countries which remain under the domination and oppression of imperialism must also be conducted on the basis of proletarian internationalism, and will take into account relations of dependency imposed by the former U.S. empire–requiring, in some cases, that parts, supplies, equipment and other assistance be provided to these countries for some time. But this must also take into account the nature of these countries and of their governments and ruling classes, the class struggle within them, and the role of these countries internationally. 

    6. The structure of production and the resource base of the socialist economy cannot depend on labor and materials from other countries–much less exploitation and domination. The development of a socialist economy must not involve the export of capital–for example, building factories, or making loans, for profit. A socialist economy must not reproduce relations of domination and inequality in its international interactions. This question, too, must be put before the masses of people, as part of their coming to more deeply understand, and to act on, the basic principles on which the New Socialist Republic in North America is founded and according to which it must proceed. 

    7. A socialist economy must practice self-reliance and sustainability at the same time that it aids the struggles of the exploited and oppressed of the world.7

    8. The economy must be planned and developed in such a way as to make provision for, and actually provide, the resources and technology necessary for the security and defense of the society and the state against provocations, aggression and attacks by imperialists and other reactionary forces. At the same time, this must be done in accordance with the principles set forth in this Constitution–including specifically those regarding defense and security–and without allowing the provision of the necessary means for defense and security to fundamentally distort or undermine the development of the economy, and the society overall, along socialist lines and the fulfilling of internationalist responsibilities. The armed forces must, at all levels, strive to economize on expenditure and, where possible and in correspondence with overall economic planning, engage in productive activities that can contribute to their self-provisioning.

    The Legacy of Parasitism and the Struggle Around What Comes First 

    EXPLOITATION: What It Is & How To Put An End To It, new from Bob Avakian, and more... Premiered Aug 24, 2023

     Let’s pause for a minute and dig into point 6. Right now, under the system of capitalism-imperialism, the standard of living in this country is based on a parasitical relation with the rest of the world, particularly the vast majority of people who live in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America. The clothes that people in this country wear, the phones we use, the fruits and vegetables available in the better-off areas, the big-screen televisions—these are produced by literally hundreds of millions of super-exploited, desperately impoverished people in places like Congo, Bangladesh, and Mexico. Those humans who produce this wealth include 150 million children—children whose lives are foreclosed and foreshortened, and ground up into the commodities we consume. 

    At the other end of the spectrum (leaving aside the ruling capitalist-imperialists) is a relatively large layer of people in this country who work in finance, insurance, real estate and other occupations that are bound up with seeking out the highest possible return on the wealth that this parasitical exploitation produces. This group has greatly expanded over the past 70 years. It is not the majority, but we are talking about well over 10 million people in operations made possible by and devoted to furthering this parasitism. And this parasitism has had a major effect on how everybody thinks and what they aspire to in America—a point to which Bob Avakian devoted a lot of attention in his work Hope For Humanity On A Scientific Basis.

    So adhering to point 6 will require a tremendous restructuring of the whole economy, with big implications for how people live and even much dislocation. It will also mean sacrifice for many—both for those sections which have “made big bank” on the basis of this parasitism, but to a degree almost everyone living in this country. And that need for sacrifice will almost certainly give rise to struggle in planning the economy in a way that breaks the chains of this imperialist domination while still meeting the material needs of people within this country. As point 6 says, this will require putting the question before the masses.

    In putting this question to the masses, those fighting to continue revolutionizing society will face resistance based on breaking with some of the style of life afforded by imperialist parasitism. Counter-revolutionaries will be all mixed in with people who just honestly disagree or have questions. Those working to lead the society further toward communism will be able to draw on real strengths in waging this struggle to transform production and to revolutionize people’s thinking. One strength will be an end to the insecurity and “fear of falling further” that haunts tens of millions even beyond the most impoverished people. 

    At the same time, there will be a lot of people who will gravitate to what the new economy makes possible. First, this economy will make it possible for people to work co-operatively and collectively to solve great social problems, rather than scuffling and scraping to make a living and the dog-eat-dog struggle for survival. Think about the scientists and people with technical ability who will for the first time be able to fully put their skills and their desire to serve people into action in a dimension almost unimaginable today. Think about the youth, as well as the oppressed masses, who will seize on the chance to contribute to breaking down the savage inequalities left over from capitalism-imperialism not only in this country but around the world, with the backing of—and not the resistance and suppression by—the leadership of society. Think about people having the chance to go to work on “protecting, preserving, and enhancing the ecosystems and biodiversity of the planet for current and future generations,” instead of helplessly living with dread of human extinction hanging over their heads. Think of the exchange of cultures on the basis of breaking down the stereotypes and hatred of other people that blast like an airhorn from the MAGA fascists today—and that in ways more subtle, though still poisonous, permeate the culture in “normal life” under capitalism-imperialism.  

    All this will play out in the kinds of society-wide debates and discussion that the Constitution provides for—including by making room for and funding those who disagree with the radically new orientation of the socialist economy and the policies flowing from that orientation. This will almost certainly involve times of sharp and widespread struggle—and that’s good! Why? Because as people come to learn more and transform their thinking through that process of discussion, debate study and more discussion, deeper unity can be built. And we are talking not only about unity on the specific policies under debate, but over the whole crucial orientation of “American lives are not more important than other people’s lives,” and “internationalism—the whole world comes first.”

    Again, a Final Important Point

    The U.S. invasion of Venezuela and the illegal arrest and kidnapping of Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores has in the past week been accompanied by new threats from Trump and others in his administration against Greenland and Denmark, Colombia, Mexico, Iran and other countries as well. As our article Trump's Global Rampage, And the Method to the Madness makes clear, there is an extremely significant danger of world war involved in this.

    Over four years ago, writing of the splits within the capitalist-imperialist ruling class over how to rule—splits which have since sharpened immeasurably—Bob Avakian wrote the following:

    It is extremely important to deeply understand this:

    As this situation develops, and the ruling class is more and more unable to rule in the old way, society and daily life for masses of people, from different parts of society, can become increasingly unsettled and chaotic, with frequent “disruptions” of the “normal” way things have been.

    And as “the normal way” society has been ruled is failing to hold things together—and society is increasingly being ripped apart—this can shake people’s belief that “the way things have always been” is the only way things can be. It can make people more open to questioning—in a real sense it can force people to question—the way things have been, and whether they have to stay that way. And this is all the more likely to happen if the revolutionary forces are out among the people shining a light on the deeper reality of what is happening, and why, and bringing out that there IS an alternative to living this way.

    As we wrote last week, at such a time, the real and powerful alternative embodied in the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, by Bob Avakian, needs to get into the bloodstream of society. This Constitution provides the sweeping vision, the concrete blueprint and the firm foundation for a whole new way to live… and a fundamentally different system. With society being ripped apart, and revolution more possible—even in the face of fascism, genocide, climate catastrophe and nuclear war—it is urgent that people raise their sights to the radically different world that's possible and take responsibility as part of the larger mission which this Constitution serves: the emancipation of humanity.

    VIDEO: The Bob Avakian Interviews 2025, Part 2

     

    Watch Part 2 of Bob Avakian's 2025 Interview.   

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. “Sustainability” refers to meeting people’s needs while protecting, conserving and repairing the planet. [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    Dreams in Dark Times
    A Benefit for The Bob Avakian Institute

    Updated

    Dreams in dark times - A Benefit for The Bob Avakian Institute

     

    Performing:
    William Parker & Matthew Shipp

    Tickets: $25 General Admission | $100 Special Reception (details TBA)
    February 3, 7 pm
    at Revolution Books, NYC
    437 Malcolm X Blvd/Lenox Ave (at 132nd Street)
    New York, NY 10037
    Tel: 212-691-3345

    We are now at the point where it is more and more urgently necessary to move beyond this whole monstrous system—beyond a situation where people are forced to struggle just for individual survival, with everyone compelled to be in competition and conflict with others, and the masses of people everywhere are chained down by outmoded oppressive relations, while the future, and the very existence, of humanity is increasingly endangered. And it is possible now to move beyond all this. A whole different way of living is possible...

    — From "A New Year—Profound New Challenges
    —And a Profoundly Positive Way Forward
    in the Face of Very Real Horror"

    Your tax deductible donations will go toward the mission of The Bob Avakian Institute to preserve, project, and promote the works and vision of Bob Avakian with the aim of reaching the broadest possible audience. Bob Avakian is a revolutionary political thinker and leader, and architect of the new communism. 

  • ARTICLE:

    In These Historic Times
    Donate to Maintain a Robust Revcom.us!

    $20,000 needed by March 1, 2026

    20000.00
    1204.00

    As of
    Goal: $20,000
    Raised: $1,204

    Daily, the truth of these words from Bob Avakian (BA) stand out more sharply:

    We, the people of the world, can no longer afford to allow these imperialists to continue to dominate the world and determine the destiny of humanity. They need to be overthrown as quickly as possible. And it is a scientific fact that we do not have to live this way.

    As we embark on a year that will be full of new demands and much struggle in the fight for a radically different and far better world, revcom.us is launching a drive to raise $20,000 to continue to maintain a robust Revolution website. 

    As the Trump regime accelerates its brutal moves to consolidate fascism in the U.S., with all the horrors on top of horrors that will bring to people here and the world over, this website is more crucial than ever. Revcom.us must play a key role in leading the revolutionary way out of this madness to a whole different world.

    It is at revcom.us that people here and in over 150 countries worldwide can access the full range of work (in English and Spanish) that BA has done over decades in bringing forward the new communism. Bob Avakian has scientifically analyzed that we are in a critical historical juncture—a rare time when an actual revolution has become more possible in this country. And through his interviews, writings and social media messages @BobAvakianOfficial, he charts the road forward to both the need and possibility of making revolution, speaking to the burning questions of the hour. 

    BA has been sounding the alarm about the rise of fascism for 30 years, and his analysis of its roots in the system of capitalism-imperialism is essential to understand not only what we face, but how this regime can be driven from power. This is concentrated in the compilation available at revcom.us—Bob Avakian’s Work on Fascism: 1996-2025.

    BA is the author of the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, which contains the sweeping vision and concrete blueprint for a socialist society that is in transition to a communist world—a world in which humanity will be emancipated from all forms and relations of exploitation and oppression, and from the ignorance and selfishness required and perpetuated by systems based on exploitation. Revcom.us is where people can read this Constitution and dig into what it says—like in the current series on how the new socialist state would deal with relations with other countries in a way that is totally different from what U.S. imperialism does around the world, and even from the way previous socialist states have handled this question.

    This new socialist system can only be brought about through an actual revolution involving millions in which the old machinery of exploitation, domination and oppression is not reformed but abolished. Revcom.us makes available to people the strategy that BA has forged for how to make this revolution, in this most powerful and destructive empire in history. 

    Revcom.us is where people go each week for urgently needed, scientific, internationalist exposure and analysis of world events—from the uprising in Iran, to the fascist MAGA moves across the Western Hemisphere and other parts of the world… attacks on women and trans people… persecution and brutalization of immigrants and Black people… existential threats to humanity from climate change caused by this system and war, possibly nuclear war, between imperialists… and much more. In this moment, revcom.us reports on the fascist moves Trump is making, exposing the roots of this fascism in the history of this country and in the capitalist-imperialist system.

    It is at revcom.us that people can learn about and connect with the REVCOM CORPS For The Emancipation Of Humanity. It’s where people can join with others in the movement for revolution and get the guidance and find the ways to contribute to and work together, in a unified way to not only wage the struggle to drive out the Trump regime, but as a part of preparing the ground and the people for the revolution that is so urgently needed.  

    Revcom.us is a lifeline for people agonizing about what is happening in the U.S. and world and seeking solutions—giving people a scientific understanding of what is happening, why it is happening, what is in the interests of humanity, and how to emancipate humanity through revolution. It must be accessible to all, and maintained and expanded. The $20,000 needed must be raised by the end of February. 

    Be part of supporting and building a community around revcom.us. DONATE GENEROUSLY.

    Bob Avakian's Work on Fascism: 1996-2025

     

  • ARTICLE:

    Trump Declares Full Control of Venezuela

    This Fascist Imperialist Gangster Must Be Stopped

    A Better World Is Possible—And Needs to Be Fought For

    U.S. OUT OF VENEZUELA
    TRUMP MUST GO NOW!
    In the Name of Humanity, We Refuse to Accept a Fascist America!
    This Whole System Is Rotten and Illegitimate. 
    We Need and We Demand: A Whole New Way to Live, a Fundamentally Different System!
    Screengrabs from videos of U.S. bombing of Caracas, Venezuela

     

    January 3, 2026: The U.S. turned the power off in parts of Venezuela’s capital city and bombed two military bases, a naval port and an airport.   

    In an outrageous, unprecedented and fascist gangster press conference, Trump declared that the U.S. is "going to run" the sovereign nation of Venezuela. This came hours after the U.S. sent their military in the dark of night to kidnap the Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro. The U.S. turned the power off in parts of Venezuela's capital city, Caracas, and bombed two military bases, a naval port and an airport.

    The criminal fascist thug Donald Trump is claiming the "right" to take over an independent country of 30 million people—maybe for years! He said that "for a period of time, the people that are standing right behind me. We're going to be running it." The people standing behind him were the fascist yes-men, Marco Rubio, General Dan Caine and dark ages Christian fascist nutcase Pete Hegseth.

    Three points on why this is happening, and what the people in the U.S. must urgently understand and do to stop this:

    1. In an illegal and illegitimate violation of international law and the sovereignty of the Venezuelan people, the fascist Trump said the U.S. would be directly controlling Venezuela, with U.S. oil companies seizing control of Venezuela's vast natural resources:

    As everyone knows, the oil business in Venezuela has been a bust, a total bust for a long period of time. They were pumping almost nothing by comparison to what they could have been pumping and what could have taken place. We're going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country. 

    Who the fuck is the U.S. to be invading a foreign country because they're not "exploiting their own oil" in the way Trump see fit?! This is the American gangsters trying to violently enforce the idea that the U.S. has the "right" to wage wars, murder civilians, and violate international law if it sees it is in their imperialist interests. They are doing so based on easily refutable lies of drug smuggling or stealing "America's oil"—oil that just happens to be under Venezuelan soil! As for the idea that “this is our [that is, the U.S.’s] oil,” go here for an understanding of gangsterish way that the U.S. came to dominate the oil industry in Venezuela, what that has meant for the people of Venezuela, and why in fact the U.S. has NO legitimate claim on this oil.

    In addition to violating international law, Trump is violating U.S. law by waging a war without congressional oversight! They are trying to legitimize war crimes because "we say they're legal." And they've been doing this for months—killing over 100 civilians in international waters with no due process!

    The fascist regime is also moving to crush all protest and dissent against it inside the U.S., labeling anti-fascists as “domestic terrorists.” Everyone should stay attuned and be ready to oppose further leaps in repression, now in the context of war.

    As the revolutionary leader Bob Avakian wrote months ago: 

    Trump fascism is a regime that openly and aggressively strips away basic rights and blatantly declares that there is no rule of law and due process of law other than what it dictates, and that raw destructive power is what must rule in the international arena, without even the pretense of adherence to international law or concern about the sovereignty, or even the right to exist, of less powerful peoples and countries.

    Revolution #114

     

    Read/listen to this social media message from @BobAvakianOfficial.   

    This invasion of Venezuela poses an extreme danger to the people of Venezuela, Latin American and the people of the world. And it poses a sharp moral and political challenge to those who hate this but are standing aside: Are you alright living in—and benefiting from—a world where the U.S. can openly invade other countries because the U.S. imperialists see it in their interests? Are you alright living in—again, and benefiting from—a world where the U.S. can send its military to murder people and kidnap people who stand in their way?

    If not, then don't you have an urgent and special responsibility to stand up against these bloody war crimes being committed in our name?! 

    2. While Trump focused on illegally and blatantly seizing Venezuela's natural resources, this invasion is about much more than "oil profits." This is about qualitatively stepped-up imperialist domination and control of an entire continent at a time when the U.S. is contending for global domination with its main imperialist rival, China. Especially now with the U.S. seizing control of resources that China relies on, this contention holds extreme danger for the people of the region and could spiral out into nuclear war. 

    For over 100 years, the U.S. has dominated Latin America through invasions, coups, torture and backing extremely repressive puppet governments. But as revcom.us wrote in an article on the Trump regime's National Security Strategy Statement (NSS), "A Strategy for a Fascist America Dominating the Planet": 

    China has over the past decade significantly upped its trade, investment and aid in Latin America. It has funded infrastructure projects including roads, telecommunication networks, etc. The U.S. now intends to undermine, limit and roll this back. As the NSS contends, "The United States must be preeminent in the Western Hemisphere as a condition of our security and prosperity."

    2025: A New Year—Profound New Challenges...

     

    Listen to and watch this important message from Bob Avakian.   

    This fascist section of the imperialist ruling class feels the need to shore up the entire Western Hemisphere—including Canada and Greenland—as the U.S.'s "neighborhood" where they have total military and economic control. At this press conference, Trump and Rubio openly threatened Cuba and Colombia to fall in line, or else.

    These fascists are attempting to deal with what they see as existential problems in maintaining the U.S. as top dog in a world of tremendous upheaval and volatility. This is part of the larger fascist program they see as their last chance to "rescue their system": rule through open violence and terror, the crushing of dissent and gutting of the rule of law, unleashing vengeful white supremacy, ethnic cleansing of immigrants, the patriarchal enslavement of women, purging of LGBT people from public life—wrapped together with Christian fascist lunacy and America-first belligerence.

    These extreme moves have created sharp divides within the dominant ruling institutions of this system and throughout society, with many feeling that what the Trump regime is doing will destroy the U.S. and its standing in the world. But while they oppose this, those forces need to be compelled and enabled to drive this regime from power—through the sustained nonviolent protest of millions, uniting all who can be united behind the demand, The Trump Fascist Regime Must Go NOW! 

    3. "We, the people of the world, can no longer afford to allow these imperialists to continue to dominate the world and determine the destiny of humanity. They need to be overthrown as quickly as possible. And it is a scientific fact that we do not have to live this way." –Bob Avakian

    What this regime is attempting is extreme, and while they are very far along in installing all-out fascism, they do not have everything sewn up. Because of big changes in a world of extreme volatility and upheaval, and the shredding of the traditionally oppressive social fabric in the U.S., the imperialists can no longer rule in the old way that people have been conditioned to accept.

    Something Terrible or Something Truly Emancipating - Square, wo "NEW"

     

    This has led to what Bob Avakian has recognized as a rare time when revolution has become more possible, even in this powerful country. People should go here and here to learn about this. 

    Now is the time—urgently—to come together with others. Join in uniting all who can be united to defeat this fascism, to stand with the people of Venezuela, and to get organized for an actual revolution to get rid of the system that has given rise to this fascism—and so many other atrocities, including the danger of human extinction through nuclear war and climate catastrophe.

    As we have said in the Declaration, We Need and We Demand: A Whole New Way to Live, A Fundamentally Different System:

    A whole different way of living is possible: a whole different way to organize society, with a radically different economic foundation and political system, emancipating relations among people and an uplifting culture—all of this oriented to meeting the basic needs and fulfilling the highest interests of the masses of people.

    With the world in the balance, this is what people need to raise their sights to, and be part of bringing into being.

    We Need and We Demand: A Whole New Way to Live, a Fundamentally Different System

     

  • ARTICLE:

    Stephen Miller says immigrants come from—and must return to—“broken homelands”… but the REAL question is:

    Who Broke Those “Homelands”? And What Does That Tell Us About the Fascists Who Now Rule This One?

    Updated

    Four national guard in front of Lincoln Memorial, November 28, 2025.

     

    National Guard patrol in front of the Lincoln Memorial, November 28, 2025.    Photo: AP

    On November 26, two National Guard soldiers in Washington, DC were shot at close range. Sarah Beckstrom, a 20-year-old woman, died, and Andrew Wolfe, a 24-year-old man, is still in the hospital with extremely serious injuries. Rahmanullah Lakanwal, a 29-year-old Afghan man who fought on the U.S. side in the Afghanistan war has been charged with first degree murder and three other felonies. He has pleaded not guilty.7 Lakanwal was shot on the scene and is still in the hospital. 

    The shooting of the two National Guard members was a heinous act. And as Refuse Fascism said in a statement, “Incidents such as this have nothing to do with and only do harm to the nonviolent mass struggle of millions that is needed to drive the fascist Trump regime from power.” But Trump and the other MAGA vultures were quick to jump on this tragic situation to further whip up hatred against Muslims and overall anti-immigrant sentiment, and to impose even more restrictions on immigration from the “Third World.” 

    Although even the police say that they don’t know what motivated the shooting, Trump declared it was “terrorism.” Kristi Noem (head of the Department of Homeland Security) claimed (without evidence) that Lakanwal had been “radicalized” by people in the Afghan community in Washington state. She said that that whole community needed to be “investigated.” Republican Senator Tommy Tuberville tweetedWe must IMMEDIATELY BAN all ISLAM immigrants and DEPORT every single Islamist who is living among us just waiting to attack.” Trump called for a “reexamination” of all Afghans who had previously been granted asylum or other legal status. 

    Trump also called for the expulsion of all Somali immigrants, calling them “garbage,” and saying they should “go back to where they came from” and that “their country is no good for a reason.” And he ordered major ICE operations targeting Somalis in the Minnesota-St. Paul area, where more than 80,000 people of Somali origin live.

    In that same cold-blooded xenophobic (immigrant-hating) spirit Trump’s chief advisor, Stephen Miller, posted this (responding to criticism of Trump for blaming whole countries for the [alleged] act of one person):

    This is the great lie of mass migration. You are not just importing individuals. You are importing societies. No magic transformation occurs when failed states cross borders. At scale, migrants and their descendants recreate the conditions, and terrors, of their broken homelands.

    How America “Broke” Afghanistan

    As one Pakistani novelist said on hearing this, “Who broke the homeland!!?” 

    This is exactly the right question! The answer to that starts with the fact that Afghanistan is “cursed” by its strategic location bridging Central and East Asia to the Middle East. So imperialist powers have repeatedly fought to control it. Britain invaded three times in the 19th century. In 1979, the former Soviet Union, which was a social-imperialist country (whose dominant power is now Russia), invaded to prop up a friendly government. In response, the U.S. helped organize, arm and fund Islamic fundamentalist armies to overthrow the pro-Soviet government. At least one-half million Afghan civilians were killed, and Afghanistan’s Islamic theocratic fascist forces were given a tremendous boost. This was part of U.S. imperialism’s drive to control the entire region of Central Asia and the Middle East. Yes, all these countries had all the problems of oppressive class societies to begin with—but by the second half of the 20th century, U.S. imperialism was the power that mainly set the terms for who did and didn’t rule, and what did and didn’t happen in these countries.

    In reaction to this and other developments, nationalist political movements rooted in Islam arose in this region. Bob Avakian summed this up in 2007 in a way that explains much about the international dynamics of the past 30 years:

    What we see in contention here with Jihad [Islamic fundamentalism] on the one hand and McWorld/McCrusade [increasingly globalized western imperialism] on the other hand, are historically outmoded strata among colonized and oppressed humanity up against historically outmoded ruling strata of the imperialist system. These two reactionary poles reinforce each other, even while opposing each other. If you side with either of these “outmodeds,” you end up strengthening both.

    While this is a very important formulation and is crucial to understanding much of the dynamics driving things in the world in this period, at the same time we do have to be clear about which of these “historically outmodeds” has done the greater damage and poses the greater threat to humanity: It is the historically outmoded ruling strata of the imperialist system, and in particular the U.S. imperialists.

    The U.S. War Against the Taliban

    Afghani boy shows scars from shrapnel. wounds U.S. bombing

     

    Ghulam shows scars from shrapnel wounds received during U.S. bombing of wedding in Kakarak in July 2002 which killed 25 people.    Photo: AP

    Afghanis peer in hole left by US airstrike

     

    Afghan villagers stand near a hole in the ceiling of a house in Kakarak, Afghanistan on July 3, 2002 after it was hit by a U.S. bomb. Between 2004 and 2018, the U.S. dropped over 38,000 bombs on Afghanistan.    Photo: AP

    Afghani children 2004

     

    Afghani children, 2004.    Photo: AP

    17 year old victim of an acid attack in Afghanistan

     

    November 12, 2008: Atifa Bibi, an Afghan school girl, recovers in a hospital after two men threw acid on her in Kandahar as she walked to school.     Photo: AP

    Afghani kids play in rubble from U.S. drone strike

     

    Afghan children play near the debris of a damaged house after a U.S. drone crashed in Jalalabad, east of Kabul, Afghanistan’s capital, August 2011. By March 2020, the U.S. had carried out over 12,000 drone strikes in Afghanistan, killing thousands of Afghans.    Photo: AP

    Hospital in Afghanistan destroyed by U.S. airstrike

     

    October 16, 2015: An employee of Doctors Without Borders walks inside the charred remains of the organization's hospital after it was hit by a U.S. airstrike in Kunduz, Afghanistan killing 42 Afghans. By August 2016, some 111,000 people had been killed and over 116,000 injured in the war.    Photo: AP

    7-Afghanistan-2008-AP09080505156-600.jpg

     

    Relatives look at children killed by a 2009 U.S. airstrike in Kandahar.    Photo: AP

    People inspect the rubble of home in Afghanistan destroyed by U.S. drone strike..

     

    People inspect the damage of the Ahmadi family house in Kabul, Afghanistan, which was destroyed in the U.S. drone strike on August 29, 2021.    Photo: AP

    killed_by_us_afghanistan-2009-RAWA-600px.jpg

     

    Bodies of civilians killed by U.S. airstrike in Afghanistan, 2009.    Photo: RAWA

    One grouping of those theocrats, the Taliban, came to power in 1996 after a period of civil war. They imposed extreme oppression of women as well as minority religions and others. In 2001, Osama bin Laden operated out of a base in Afghanistan to engineer the bombing of the World Trade Center in New York. The Taliban offered to negotiate bin Laden’s turnover to the U.S., but the U.S. instead seized the opportunity to invade and occupy Afghanistan and overthrow the Taliban. They cobbled together a corrupt and widely despised puppet government in its place. War erupted between the U.S. and its lackey government on one side and the Taliban on the other, leading to an estimated 241,000 civilian deaths by violence, and hundreds of thousands more from war-caused hunger and disease.

    Forty years of war, generations being born, living and dying surrounded by death, destruction, brutal oppressors and foreign armies. Agriculture devastated, and the economy increasingly dependent on war spending and other funds, almost all of which either came from or were controlled by U.S. imperialism.

    What It Really Means to Work for American Occupiers

    During the U.S. occupation many thousands of people worked for the U.S., the pro-U.S. government, or NGOs or businesses tied to the U.S. Some were thugs and gangsters tied into one or another warlord that the U.S. allied with, but some took these jobs either to ward off hunger, or in the misguided belief that the U.S. was actually there to help liberate them from the oppressive Taliban. But doing this also put them at odds with many in their families or neighbors who opposed the U.S. occupation even as they also hated the Taliban. And it put them at risk of being killed by the Taliban.

    Rahmanullah Lakanwal was one of them, reportedly recruited into the CIA-led Unit 03 of the Kandahar Strike Force in 2012, when he was just 16 years old. These Strike Forces (also known as “Zero Units”) were in fact death squads, committing war crimes against the Afghan people. In 2019, Human Rights Watch (HRW) reported on 14 documented incidents in which these units carried out night raids, bursting into homes as people slept, and slaughtering civilians, including small children and elderly people, and other crimes.8

    When the U.S. was recruiting Afghans to work with them, they always promised “we’ll protect you, we’ll have your back.” But then when the U.S. pulled out, it made no serious provision for the safety of tens of thousands of people who had worked with them, whether as teachers, soldiers or political leaders. There was a desperate scramble for people to get out as the Taliban retook the country. Some thousands did escape, and then (like Lakanwal) were put through intensive vetting to prove, again and again, that they were “loyal” enough to enter the U.S., while the U.S. government sought to wash its hands of them as quickly as possible.9

    We don’t know a lot about Lakanwal, but one thing that has been reported by friends, family and social workers is that he appeared to be going through a mental breakdown, spending weeks in a dark room not talking to anyone, going off for weeks in the family car. And this was reportedly bound up with his experience in the Zero Unit.

    So when it comes to the question of “who broke the homeland?” it is clear it is the imperialist system, with its built-in drive for imperialist powers like the U.S. and its rivals to divide and redivide the world. Then, when things go sideways for them, they have the nerve to turn on the victims of their butchery and treachery, and question their humanity, and demand that they be cast out of society or driven into the shadows? Afghanistan is not unique in this. You can look at our series American Crime and find some similar stories all over the world, including from more than one of the 19 non-European countries from which Trump has now banned all immigration to the U.S.

    Faced with a huge crisis of that very system, the fascist section of this imperialist ruling class—Trump, Miller, Vance and all the rest—are on a mission to save that system through a fascist form of rule. In their view, a fascist form of rule—one rooted in blatant, open and violent white supremacy, in male domination of women and repression of LGBT people, and in open hatred and massive scapegoating of  those they consider “foreigners”; one saturated in anti-scientific ignorance and theocratic fundamentalist Christianity; and one in which due process and civil liberties are essentially wiped out—is the only thing that can save the empire.

    In the face of this, once again, we revcoms say:

    In The Name Of Humanity, We Refuse To Accept A Fascist America!
    This Whole System Is Rotten And Illegitimate!
    We Need And We Demand: A Whole New Way To Live, A Fundamentally Different System!
    Bringing Forward Another Way cover 600
    Bringing Forward Another Way cover 600

     

    This groundbreaking analysis, made during the George W. Bush years, continues to be very relevant, especially in the context of sharpening contradictions centered in the Middle East.

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. We want to emphasize that Lakanwal is innocent until proven guilty. This (“innocent until proven guilty”) is an important principle for many reasons, but especially so in this situation where virtually all information is coming from the police and FBI. It is a well-known fact that such agencies will bend facts, outright lie or even manufacture evidence, especially in “high-profile” cases. In this article we are getting into how the fascists are trying to use the incident, which is different from whether the incident went down the way the authorities say. [back]

    2. Speaking of these night raids, which were a central part to U.S. military operations, a U.S. Army Ranger told a journalist, “You go on night raids, make more enemies, then you gotta go on more night raids for the more enemies you now have to kill.” [back]

    3. There was significant anger about this from sections of the U.S. military and diplomatic core who felt they had some responsibility for people they had drawn into a dangerous situation. Many organized private groups to get people out. For some, this was an eye-opening experience, beginning to grasp that the claims by the rulers that their wars were waged for the benefit of oppressed people, were just propaganda to suck people in. [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    From Revolutionary Communist Group, Colombia:

    U.S. Out of Venezuela! The Imperialists Are Not the Solution, They Are the Problem!

    Revcom.us editors’ note: This article appeared in Spanish on Alborada Comunista, website of the Revolutionary Communist Group (GCR), Colombia, and was translated into English by revcom.us volunteers.

    In the early hours of today, the United States launched a “large-scale” assault against Venezuela, with airstrikes against several military and civilian targets in Caracas, the Venezuelan capital, as well as in the states of Miranda, Aragua, and La Guaira. Furthermore, Trump announced by a social media post that the United States had “captured” the president of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, along with his wife, and that they are being transported (on the USS Iwo Jima) to the U.S. The fascist U.S. Attorney General, Pamela Bondi, announced that charges have been filed against Maduro so that he can be tried in a New York court.

    The United States has no right to disregard international law, bomb a country, and kidnap its president, as if they were the “world’s policeman.” The fact that the regime of Maduro, Diosdado Cabello [Venezuela Minister of Interior, Justice and Peace], and Vladimir Padrino [Venezuela Minister of Defense] does not represent anything positive for the Venezuelan people does not make a U.S. imperialist invasion legitimate or represent anything “good.”

    This U.S. aggression against Venezuela is criminal and is a serious demonstration of the serious danger that the United States represents to the world, especially now under a fascist regime like Trump’s: It takes place after months of illegal bombings and serial extrajudicial executions in the Caribbean and Pacific waters, following recent U.S. attacks in Nigeria and open threats to launch new attacks against the reactionary Islamic Republic of Iran. This invasion against Venezuela is a demonstration not only of the imperialist character of the United States, but also of the fascist character of the regime that governs there today, and is another step in the consolidation of a fascist military, economic, and political bloc in Latin America that is a loyal vassal of U.S. interests.

    It is urgent to strongly oppose this imperialist invasion and all imperialist moves by the United States. It is repugnant and criminal how sections of the right, both within Colombia (including directly [ex Colombian presidents] Uribe, Duque, and Pastrana) and in Latin America (the fascist-leaning presidents of Argentina, Javier Milei, and Ecuador, Daniel Noboa) are calling for this invasion to be celebrated as a “humanitarian intervention” or even, as former [Colombian] President Uribe stated, an act of “legitimate (self-)defense” on the part of the United States. This servile and pro-“national subjugation” position must be condemned and confronted. And although the discontent of a large section of the Venezuelan population with the Maduro regime is understandable, their desires for change are being used as an instrument to justify the criminal U.S. aggression and to install a regime loyal to Trump’s United States, with all the horror that this also means for the vast majority.

    It is necessary to organize the broadest, deepest, and most determined anti-imperialist struggle, “we need to develop a movement that opposes any aggression by the United States against Venezuela, Colombia, or any other country, and to do this without taking sides with the imperialist interests of any of the contending imperialist powers, but rather by opposing the imperialist system as a whole. To forge such a movement, we must not ‘ignore what divides us’; we must grapple, using the right method and spirit, around the differences in viewpoints and programs, so that more and more people can become more conscious and identify programs that can only lead from one catastrophe to another, and instead embrace those programs that aim for a fundamentally different future.” [From the Revolutionary Communist Group, Colombia: No U.S. Imperialist War Against Venezuela! No Imperialist Domination Over Latin America and the World!]

    It is necessary for broad sections of the people in Colombia and other parts of the world to mobilize right now, condemning this imperialist aggression against Venezuela. We must mobilize a powerful force that opposes the plans of the U.S. imperialists to consolidate Latin America as their backyard, loyal to Trumpist fascism. “Now is the time to take on this inspiring challenge which enables us to unite in combating the ongoing crimes, and against the system that causes them, the capitalist imperialist system.”

    U.S. OUT OF VENEZUELA!
    IN THE NAME OF HUMANITY, WE REFUSE TO ACCEPT A FASCIST AMERICA!
    THIS WHOLE SYSTEM IS ROTTEN AND ILLEGITIMATE—WE NEED AND WE DEMAND A WHOLE NEW WAY TO LIVE, A FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT SYSTEM!
    TRUMP MUST GO NOW!!!

    Revolutionary Communist Group, Colombia | January 3, 2026

  • ARTICLE:

    Urgent Warning: People Need to Know About and Come Together to Defeat the Fascist Repression Ahead

    Cops push protesters at ICE detention center Broadview, Illinois, November 1, 2025.

     

    Protest at ICE detention center, Broadview, Illinois, November 1, 2025.    Photo: Paul Goyette

    We are in the midst of a major fascist leap in the suppression of protest and dissent—but most people don't even know about this. Revcom.us has been reporting on the extreme repressive moves which are otherwise getting very little attention—in the mainstream media or among anti-fascist writers. And this urgently has to change.

    This week, we are pulling together a number of these articles and encouraging readers to spread these widely. Grapple together about what is required to combat these fascist repressive moves as part of defeating Trump/MAGA fascism and as part of building up the forces for revolution to bring a radically different, and far better system into being. How do we sound the alarm throughout society? How do we raise standards among the decent people who oppose this fascism? How do we build a movement that has each other's backs?

    In a December 15 article on a memo from the fascist Department of Justice, we wrote:

    This memo almost certainly foreshadows a major leap in repression. This can neither be brushed off and treated as empty threats, nor can we allow ourselves and all the decent people opposed to this fascism to be preemptively scared into submission. Such moves—if people are mobilized to understand the threat they pose—could politically backfire on the fascists.

    But that only happens if consciousness is raised about the real danger of these moves and if standards are adopted in the movement against Trump that “an injury to one is an injury to all,” with individuals and organizations standing with anyone under attack.

    In addition to articles from revcom.us, we want to highlight a few other voices sounding the alarm from different perspectives:

    Pam Bondi’s Ominous New Memo: “Operationalizing” Trump’s All-Out Fascist Vision, revcom.us, December 15, 2025. 

    An overall analysis and dissection of the Justice Department memo issued by Attorney General Pam Bondi, its implications, and what to do in the face of it.

    ***

    Regime Launches “All-of-Government Effort to Dismantle” All Opposition to Fascism, revcom.us, October 20, 2025. 

    An overall analysis and dissection of two September executive orders from Trump—one designating “antifa” as a “Domestic Terror Organization,” the other calling for an all-out campaign against political dissent and opposition using the pretext of “domestic terrorism.” 

    ***

    “Don’t Talk”—A Fundamental Principle for Resisting Repression and Defending the Rights of the People, revcom.us, February 10, 2025. 

    Essential reading that prepares people to understand and deal with encounters with FBI and other “investigators” being unleashed by the Bondi memo.

    ***

    How Can The President Go After Citizens, Senator Elissa Slotkin, December 17, 2025.

    A short YouTube talk on how and why the Bondi Memorandum is another major step in repression.

    ***

    The Bondi Memo’s Quiet Rewriting of Domestic Terrorism Rules, by Thomas E. Brzozowski, Lawfaremedia.org, December 12, 2025.

    Brzozowski writes, "If you were not already on high alert, you should be now." Brzozowski is a former Counsel for Domestic Terrorism in the Counterterrorism Section of the U.S. Department of Justice. 

    ***

    U.S. Military Willing to Attack “Designated Terrorist Organizations” Within America, General Says, Nick Turse, The Intercept, December 16, 2025.

    Head of the U.S. Northern Command testifies in a Senate hearing that if he was ordered lawfully to deploy troops in cities against “designated terrorist organizations,” he would “execute the order.”

    ***

    FBI Making List of American “Extremists,” Leaked Memo Reveals, Ken Klippenstein, December 6, 2025.

    Klippenstein was the first to report on the Bondi memo. 

    ***

    Bob Avakian Official Revolution 135

     

    Read | listen to this message from Bob Avakian.   

  • ARTICLE:

    Warning for the Decent People Who Oppose Trump/MAGA Fascism: Don't Fall for Dishonest Divide-and-Conquer Schemes

    The Revcoms reply to Kristofer Goldsmith’s lies about Refuse Fascism, the Revcoms and the Revolutionary Leader Bob Avakian

    Updated

    In a hit piece on Substack, Kris Goldsmith relies on tired slander and anti-communist distortion to attack Refuse Fascism for its association with the revcoms and Bob Avakian, the revolutionary leader and architect of the new communism.  Goldsmith paints a cartoon caricature of sinister communists working behind the scenes to take advantage of people in protests against fascism for "visibility."  He repeats the lie that the revcoms are a "cult."  Absent in his essay are any actual statements from Avakian or the revcoms.

    Goldsmith laces his argument with dire warnings that Refuse Fascism and the revcoms will do damage to the fight against Trump/MAGA fascism. This is despite the fact that Refuse Fascism (an organization involving people from different perspectives which was formed just weeks after Trump's first election) has been the most consistent, and usually the only, national organization that has recognized what we are facing as fascism and called on people to act commensurately. 

    Goldsmith's whole argument is based on the Trumpian logic that "a lot of people are saying" so it must be true. 

    But repeating crude slanders and cheap lies does not make those slanders and lies any more true, or less harmful—and invoking others who have spewed the same lies and slanders does not make them any more credible.  It only puts you in the company of others using unprincipled methods, and joins in the harm such unprincipled attacks do.  This is especially terrible now, given the monumental stakes involved in the fight against this Trump/MAGA fascism. 

    Many people have called out these divide-and-conquer schemes, seeing the urgent need to unite all who can be united behind the single demand: The Trump Fascist Regime Must Go NOW!  But there are unfortunately too many others who take up the "I heard it on the internet so it must be true" logic, believing lies and distortions about the position of the revcoms and Bob Avakian without having the intellectual integrity to look into it for themselves.

    These attacks—and the accompanying gossip culture—do the dirty work for Trump fascism by working to undermine the broad and principled unity needed to defeat this fascism.  These tactics—relying on rumor, lies and distorting people's views to isolate and silence them—smack strongly of the tactics of the right wing fascist forces in this country and the political police (the FBI, etc.) who create pretexts to go after revolutionary groups, and who engage in character assassination to discredit revolutionary leaders. (See: “In the 1960s, the Government Spread Lies to Foment Violent Conflict Within the Movement...”)

    Especially as the Trump fascist regime is moving to classify all anti-fascist opposition—from Democratic Party politicians to No Kings protesters—as "domestic terrorism," these attacks are extremely dangerous.  Don't fall for it.

    Principled debate over strategy and analysis are essential to any movement for positive change.  But that is very different than lies, slander, and personal attacks.  With Goldsmith in particular, these attacks seem to be covering over and distracting from major differences about this fundamental truth: the Trump fascist regime cannot be contained, it must be stopped.  And the only way to stop it is to drive it from power through sustained, nonviolent determined protest centered in Washington, DC at the seat of power.  This is what the organization Refuse Fascism, involving people from different perspectives and viewpoints, has been tirelessly organizing people to do. 

    Three Essential Differences

    Central in Goldsmith's attack is a dishonest distortion about who Bob Avakian is and what his work and leadership are actually about. 

    Bob Avakian (or BA) is a revolutionary leader and the architect of the new communism.  He’s played a role in the revolutionary movement going back over 60 years now, to the Free Speech Movement in Berkeley and working closely with the Black Panther Party.  You can learn more about him, his work and his life here

    Here, we are going to focus on three crucial points at issue: how serious is this fascism; on what basis should the dividing lines within those fighting this fascism be drawn; and what does good leadership consist of.  As part of that, we’ll go into BA’s work on fascism, leadership and the importance of critical thinking so that people will actually have some basis to judge right and wrong.  We’ll also show how Goldsmith avoids original sources and instead relies on rumors and innuendo and why Goldsmith’s mode of attack is not only incredibly dishonest but dangerously irresponsible. 

    Difference number one: How dangerous and how consolidated IS this fascism?

    The single most important question facing people in this country today is the rapid imposition of fascism on America. 

    In his hit piece, Goldsmith talks about the “creeping normalization of fascist politics in America.” Creeping normalization”—sorry, but that ship sailed a long time ago. Creeping?” Please. As the Refuse Fascism call states, “Fascism is upon us.”

    It’s not creeping. It’s in power and moving to consolidate that power daily.  Do you want to deny the truth of what Bob Avakian said less than three months ago?

    If this fascist regime is allowed to remain in power, everything that decent people have felt they could rely on to seek justice will be brutally shut down...every uplifting moral value will be reviled and repressed...every sphere of society will be remade, in terrible ways, in line with the male supremacist, anti-LGBT, white supremacist and anti-immigrant cruelty and the anti-scientific, health and climate destroying madness of the Trump fascist regime and the bloodthirsty ravings and depraved violence of fanatics heading “the department of war,” with the deranged maniac Trump having his finger on the nuclear button.

    Every vision, and every active striving, for a better, more just world, for a future worth living in, will be violently suppressed and effectively foreclosed, at least for the foreseeable future.

    This is not hyperbole—it is the bitter reality that is being rapidly enforced.

    No, this didn’t happen overnight. Bob Avakian has studied the question of fascism in America, and he has written and spoken on it for 30 years.  He’s traced its development and scientifically analyzed its deep roots in American society, as well as the dynamics driving it. Go here from 2004, here from 2017, and here from two months ago to get a sense of the content, through-line and the development of this analysis.  So yes, not overnight, but way the hell away from “creeping”—and with Trump Two, all this has taken a further leap.

    A History of Attacks Which Serve to Hide the Real Difference

    Goldsmith hinges much of his argument on recycling old attacks on Rise Up 4 Abortion Rights, a national organization that revcom Sunsara Taylor founded along with abortion provider Merle Hoffman, feminist writer Lori Sokol and others.  What Goldsmith doesn't tell you is that the organizations who launched this attack were the same ones who refused to call for mass protest against the overturning of Roe v Wade. These groups focused only on distribution of abortion medication and abortion funds.  While both provide an essential service, this was a losing and defensive strategy.  In contrast, Rise Up 4 Abortion Rights called people into the streets with the aim of preventing the ripping away of the fundamental right to abortion nationwide. 

    The organizations that attacked Rise Up followed the longstanding line of the Democratic Party—minimizing the fascist danger, ceding the moral high ground to anti-abortion fanatics, compromising on women's lives, and working within the “normal channels” of this system, even as an illegitimate fascist-packed Supreme Court was ripping away basic rights, and the fascists were shredding those “normal channels.” 

    But, as Goldsmith does today, instead of openly debating out these differences over strategy and analysis, they relied on lies, slander and personal attacks to shut down this debate.

    And whatever the intention, Goldsmith's attack on Refuse Fascism serves the same goal: keeping people's thinking and actions confined to terms set by the “normal channels” of this system, even as once again and even more rapidly, those channels are being shredded.

    Goldsmith says he is seeking to protect the "Removal Coalition” from the "co-optation efforts" of Refuse Fascism.  The Removal Coalition is a relatively new grouping, started in June 2025.  Goldsmith writes: “Veterans, activists, and content creators gathered in Washington right now for the Remove the Regime rally have every reason to be proud. This is the kind of pro-democracy organizing we need more of—creative, strategic, and grounded in community.”

    But he does not speak to the important differences over strategy.  In writing about the three days of protest organized by the Removal Coalition on November 20-22, revcom.us wrote

    All this brought important energy and public pressure and opposition to Trump into the nation's capital and this is a positive contribution to the mass struggle that is needed to bring about the regime's removal. At the same time, while impeachment could be one means through which this demand is met, it is not the only means through which Trump could be nonviolently removed. Even more essential: it is unlikely in the extreme that it would be brought about without a massive, nonviolent, sustained struggle of millions demanding Trump's removal. Also, the terms and pacing of this struggle must not be set by congressional calendars and procedures; the pace of the fascist juggernaut is way too urgent for that. And while lobbying can certainly play a role, such activity cannot substitute for what must ultimately be millions in the streets in sustained nonviolent protest—centered in Washington, DC.

    Goldsmith Indulges Himself in Fantasy and Delusion in the Face of REAL Danger

    Goldsmith repeatedly downplays the extreme danger of Trump MAGA fascism, danger that is posed right now.  He does this in a recent video when he says that “Senator Mark Kelly is being investigated for sedition—and that’s a good thing.”  He paints a rosy scenario in which Kelly will certainly be acquitted and at the same time this will finally wake up the Democrats and, through a series of elections, allow for the threat of fascism to be crushed.  Goldsmith blinds himself to the actual threat being posed to Kelly and to the rapid and radical fascist-driven transformations of the officer corps and military justice system (that Goldsmith assumes will acquit Kelly). He refused to deal with the actual reasons the Democratic Party as a whole has up to now not resisted fascism, and to the great likelihood that the 2026 elections—if they happen at all—will be rigged by Trump and MAGA (a process already being set in motion). 

    Even if somehow this extremely complicated and extremely unlikely chain of events should come to pass, it is profoundly immoral to wait until the midterms while thousands of people are being chewed up and destroyed by Trumpian fascism and the whole planet is being imperiled. 

    So, that’s difference number one—“creeping normalization” and relying on the Democrats vs. coming to grips with the reality of the fascist transformation of America NOW.

    Difference number two: On what basis should the movement against fascism unite?

    Goldsmith further argues, “Opposition to fascism, on its own, is not a political compass. What matters is what they want in its place.” 

    To the contrary, at this time opposition to fascism is in fact the most important political dividing line in the country.  The single thing that has to unite millions—communists, Democrats, never-Trump Republicans, social democrats, all the decent people who refuse to capitulate to dark ages fascism—is the determination to drive the Trump fascist regime from power.  Whether you want to restore what you see as “the promise of America,” or whether like us you advocate for getting to a world “without everything America stands for and everything it does in the world,” we must come together behind one single unifying demand: The Trump Fascist Regime Must Go NOW!

    As Avakian has repeatedly argued for:

    Many individuals, organizations and groups will have different views on what has given rise to this fascism, and what should replace it, and we revcoms (revolutionary communists) will continue to forthrightly put forward and argue for our views on this, and encourage others to similarly put forward their own perspectives. But this must take place in the context and atmosphere where we are all pulling together to overcome every obstacle—including “divide and conquer” schemes, from whatever source and in whatever guise—uniting all who can be united, in the millions and millions, to achieve the truly historic goal of driving out this fascist regime.

    Part of Goldsmith's "warning" is that Avakian and the revcoms supposedly have sinister and nefarious goals in trying to unite with others, trying to "coopt" mass movements.  Aside from the capitalist mode of thinking that movements against oppression can be "owned," we have to ask: why is wanting to defeat fascism to restore the status quo seen as a legitimate position, but wanting to defeat fascism because you are driven by the interests of humanity all over the world to live free from exploitation and oppression is somehow suspect? 

    Last December, in a social media message Avakian predicted that this accusation might be made by "people looking for some reason, or excuse, not to rise to the challenge of defeating this fascism"

    I am not calling for a mass movement to defeat Trump/MAGA fascism as some kind of “gimmick” whose aim is not really to defeat this fascism but is to somehow “trick” people into supporting a revolution to overthrow the whole system. One of the most fundamental principles of the new communism I have developed is the need to consistently approach things in a serious, scientific way—and this means being open and honest about what our objectives are. As I said at the beginning, we revcoms (revolutionary communists, based on the new communism) are serious about defeating this fascism—because this fascism represents a very real horror not only for the people in this country but for people throughout the world.

    At the same time, as I have repeatedly emphasized, this fascism has been brought forth by—has grown out of the very soil of—the system of capitalism-imperialism and its development through the history of this countryBy its very nature, this system has continually brought forth horror after horror; and only an actual revolution can open the way to finally ending the terrible atrocity and needless suffering constantly caused by this system.

    We revcoms will continue to work urgently to win people, in the thousands and then millions, to see the need—and to act on the need—for revolution. If it turned out that a massive movement actually succeeded in defeating Trump/MAGA fascism, without that involving the revolutionary overthrow of the whole system of capitalism-imperialism, then we would certainly not somehow be “disappointed”! We would recognize the great importance of this victory, for the cause of humanity. And we would continue to work tirelessly to carry forward the struggle toward the goal of revolution which is necessary to end the endless horrors of this whole system of capitalism-imperialism, and bring into being a much better system—as set forth in the Declaration at revcom.us: WE NEED AND WE DEMAND: A WHOLE NEW WAY TO LIVE, A FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT SYSTEM.

    Difference number three: The question of leadership

    Without a real argument of substance to make, Goldsmith falls back on the favorite of those who want you to avoid engaging Bob Avakian, that the revcoms are a “cult.”  Avakian himself has spoken to this more than once, including why this kind of thing too easily gets over in the current culture. 

    Beyond that, though, one of the hallmarks of the new communism that Bob Avakian has brought forward is the recognition of the need for a scientific, evidence-based approach to understanding and radically changing the world. He argues for a process that fosters debate and dissent.  Speaking about the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America which Avakian authored, he said:

    It is a fact that, nowhere else, in any actual or proposed founding or guiding document of any government, is there anything like not only the protection but the provision for dissent and intellectual and cultural ferment that is embodied in this Constitution, while this has, as its solid core, a grounding in the socialist transformation of the economy, with the goal of abolishing all exploitation, and the corresponding transformation of the social relations and political institutions, to uproot all oppression, and the promotion, through the educational system and in society as a whole, of an approach that will “enable people to pursue the truth wherever it leads, with a spirit of critical thinking and scientific curiosity, and in this way to continually learn about the world and be better able to contribute to changing it in accordance with the fundamental interests of humanity.”

    Avakian goes on to say, in this same message (“Irresponsible Opportunist Distortions Should Not Be Allowed…”), 

    The principles and methods that have led to the development of the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America are also the basis and the guideline for how we revcoms approach working with many others, of different political perspectives, in order to unite all who can be united in massive, powerful, sustained and relentless non-violent struggle to defeat and remove the Trump fascist regime—which, from our perspective, is a crucial part of moving to bring about the revolution that will lead to the profoundly liberating system that is embodied in the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, aiming for the emancipation of humanity as a whole from all systems and relations of exploitation and oppression everywhere in the world.

    This is what I and the revcoms actually stand for, and have dedicated our lives and efforts to fighting for. Honest questions or principled disagreement about this is welcome and can be the basis for meaningful discussion and debate—at the same time as everyone who refuses to accept a fascist America is united as a powerful force to meet the urgent need to defeat and remove the Trump fascist regime.

    That is the principle, clarity and urgency needed now.  As the fascist regime is moving so so quickly to lock down an all-out fascist America which threatens humanity and the planet, it is everyone's responsibility to not fall for dishonest divide-and-conquer schemes, and call these out when you see them. 

  • ARTICLE:

    In the 1960s, the Government Spread Lies to Foment Violent Conflict Within the Movement

    The Lessons of That Time Need to Be Learned Anew Today

    Updated

    Did you know that from 1956 to 1971 the FBI conducted a program designed to foment conflict within revolutionary movements, as well as broader movements for reform—conflicts which not only crippled these movements, but served as a cover to carry out frame-ups and even outright murder of revolutionary fighters and activists?

    Did you know that they sent undercover people into these movements specifically to create or magnify conflicts? Did you know that they relied on unsubstantiated gossip and often inventions, as well as forged documents as part of their arsenal?

    Did you know that they took statements out of context to distort the real views of activists and revolutionary fighters and use these as pretexts for smear campaigns and attempted prosecutions?

    All this came to light in 1971, when some brave and heroic people appropriated the files revealing this program in a nighttime operation to go into an FBI office and bring these criminal activities by the government to light. As a result, many people in the movements of the time and even beyond, in broader society, adopted different standards for settling inevitable conflicts over politics and ideology in a principled way, and preventing the police, FBI and other government agencies from spreading slanders, fomenting conflicts and endangering the lives of people active in the struggle for justice.

    Muhammed Kenyatta waves stolen FBI documents, 1971.

     

    Muhammed Kenyatta waves stolen FBI documents, 1971.    Photo: AP

    Now, decades later, a new generation is way too unaware either of the FBI activities or the protocols widely adopted. We saw the results of this in 2022, with the vicious and very dangerous slander campaign that was launched against Rise Up 4 Abortion Rights, the revcoms, Bob Avakian and Sunsara Taylor. And now, in light of the heightened repression from Trump fascism and the low standards that exist among people broadly, we are reissuing this article.

    We urge people to read and spread the article below, and to insist on principled discussion and debate over disagreements and to oppose any dangerous campaigns of lies, disinformation and distortion.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~

    COINTELPRO was launched by the FBI in secret in 1956 in the context of the rising civil rights movement, and operations were later “signed on” to by the Kennedy administration. Its reach was broad and vicious. The FBI, working in sync with local police “Red Squads” (political police) wrote leaflets fomenting conflicts between different groups. They sent anonymous letters warning parents and school administrators of what their children and students were supposedly doing. They conducted police surveillance and repression against antiwar coffee houses opening near military bases. And those the FBI identified as leaders, in particular, were marked for “neutralization” by the FBI, a euphemism for being framed up on serious criminal charges or killed.

    One of the earliest, ugliest and most grievous FBI operations was against Malcolm X. We recently covered this, and we are including it here as a companion to this article.

    Going After Martin Luther King Through Personal Slander and Harassment

    One element in COINTELPRO attacks on the civil rights movement was the dissemination by the FBI of allegations about Martin Luther King’s sex life that had nothing to do with the struggle for civil rights, or debates within that movement or in society as a whole. The FBI bugged King’s bedroom(!) and then, directly or posing as “concerned individuals” sent supposed taped “evidence” to media outlets and others, including colleges where King was invited to speak, demanding he be disinvited. They even sent such a tape to his wife, Coretta Scott King, in the hope of causing anguish and breaking up the marriage.

    The FBI also circulated allegations that King’s movement had organizational and financial connections to communists, playing on anti-communist prejudices, to push (and provide an excuse for) white liberals and what the FBI identified as “the responsible Negro community” to stay away from the civil rights movement at a time when civil rights activists were being brutally attacked and murdered by police and the KKK, and as a cover for massive surveillance of the civil rights movement. Whether or not the authorities were directly involved in King’s murder in Memphis in 1968 as his family and close associates have insisted, the COINTELPRO operation created conditions that facilitated his assassination and was continued for a year after his death.

    WIKI-Mlk-suicide-letter-400.jpg

     

    Going After the Panthers: Fomenting Conflicts to Murder Leadership

    A major objective and focus of COINTELPRO was isolating and setting up the most revolutionary forces at the time, especially the Black Panther Party (BPP), for attack. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, in a secret memo, wrote to offices calling for “imaginative and hard-hitting counterintelligence measures aimed at crippling the BPP.” (Emphasis added.)

    As they did with Malcolm X (see the accompanying article), the FBI often focused on setting up others to do the actual dirty work. To take one notorious example, the FBI forged a letter, supposedly from someone in the community, to Jeff Fort, the leader of the Blackstone Rangers, a Chicago gang at the time, claiming that the Black Panther Party was getting ready to move on him. In this case, in the climate of the times when there was both a broad culture of being alert to moves by the authorities to forge accusations to set people up, and when there was broad respect for the Panthers and the revolution, Fort decided the threatening letter was not credible. This letter was part of a larger COINTELPRO operation that set into motion events that led to the assassination of Panther leader Fred Hampton by Chicago police and the FBI in 1969.

    FredHamptonKilledHirez_AP691204082-400.jpg

     

    Chicago police with Fred Hampton's body.    Photo: AP

    In another COINTELPRO operation, the LA office of the FBI came up with a plan to forge a letter claiming the US Organization (United Slaves), which had been attacking the Panthers, believed that the BPP had a contract out to kill their leader. The LA FBI office wrote that the objective was for “this counterintelligence measure [to] result in an ‘US’ and BPP vendetta.” The operation was part of what led to the terrible murder of Black Panther leaders John Huggins and Alprentice “Bunchy” Carter by US members in Los Angeles.

    Black Panthers, Bunchy Carter and John Huggins

     

    Bunchy Carter and John Huggins, Black Panther leaders, murdered in 1969.   

    Again, there were real issues to resolve, questions to investigate, and debates to struggle out among those struggling for a different and better world in different ways, coming from different outlooks at the time, as now. The pattern and practice of COINTELPRO was to exploit these contradictions to twist them into vicious, destructive personal attacks, with an aim of disintegrating the movements for social change and an edge of isolating and setting up the most radical and revolutionary forces and leaders for what COINTELPRO documents euphemistically referred to as “neutralization.”

    Conclusion: don’t fall for—and don’t tolerate—the kinds of behavior that mimic what the FBI has used to destroy social movements. Call it out.

    FBI surveillance files on Bob Avakian.

     

    FBI surveillance files on Bob Avakian.   

    Identifying and Going After Bob Avakian Early On

    In his memoir, From Ike to Mao and Beyond, Bob Avakian (BA), who emerged as a revolutionary in the 1960s and today is leading the movement for revolution, talks about how he was a target for surveillance. At a demonstration, he was approached by the head of the Berkeley police “red squad” and told that he and the Revolutionary Union (the RU, which BA played a central role in founding) were under surveillance.

    BA has written about being in Chicago for the New Politics Convention and going back to his car and finding a guy who was “obviously from the Chicago red squad or the FBI” in a car behind his car “writing things down.” A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) discovery revealed that the House of Representatives did a “whole report and investigation on the RU.” Another FOIA inquiry also showed that BA was under surveillance in Maywood, a suburb of Chicago, and that the FBI had made a diagram of the inside of his house, “indicating through which windows someone could see different things going on inside the house.” This was a similar type of diagram to that used by the FBI and the Chicago cops that enabled them to assassinate Fred Hampton, leader of the Chicago Black Panther Party.

    memoir-front.jpg

     

    Resources:

    The book The COINTELPRO Papers, by Ward Churchill and Jim Vander Wall contains a vast collection of original FBI memos and reports including documentation for the incidents described in this article. It is available as an online PDF.

    This article draws on installments of the American Crime series at revcoms.us: American Crime Case #41: COINTELPRO—The FBI Targets the New Left, 1964-1971 and American Crime Case #42: COINTELPRO—The FBI Targets the Black Freedom Struggle, 1956-1971.

    An important letter drawing lessons for today from the COINTELPRO operation against Malcolm X: A Reflection on Piggery—Then and Now.

  • ARTICLE:

    “Don’t Talk”—A Fundamental Principle for Resisting Repression and Defending the Rights of the People 

    Trump/MAGA fascism is being aggressively imposed on this society in many horrifying ways, instilling fear and a pull towards cooperation with government authorities. One of the ways people are being confronted with this is in situations where people are stopped as they go about their daily business at school, work, or shopping for food and necessities. Right now, that is a living reality for people who are being targeted as “illegal” immigrants, based on how they look or talk. But there are other situations that can be equally frightening: like when someone is arrested at or in connection with a political protest, or when someone is being questioned by police when they don’t have any idea what it is about. In all cases, people need to know what is the best way to respond to prevent these government agencies from doing great harm

    In the popular culture in movies and TV shows, to the ever-present law-and-order shows of one kind or another, and even the news, all trumpet the same theme: if the police want to talk to you, you are already assumed to be guilty—of something. To exercise one's legal rights is viewed as further evidence of guilt; even the most basic right—getting a lawyer to defend oneself from the legal and illegal onslaught of cops, prosecutors and judges—is depicted with a sneer as "lawyering up," as though this shows you must be guilty or have something to hide. 

    Miranda Rights, four points.

     

    Sometimes you hear the police reading what’s called the Miranda warning (see box) to a person they are intending to interrogate, stating that you have the right to remain silent and the right to a lawyer. But then everything proceeds as though the person being questioned is showing their guilt by refusing to answer questions and getting a lawyer to represent them.

    But in real-life situations, the best advice lawyers give anyone who is being arrested, questioned or contacted in any way by the police is: DON’T TALK. 

    It is important for people to know what rights they DO have when agents of repression come sniffing around. And it is especially important to insist on those rights even as they are increasingly coming under attack. 

    Bob Avakian has spoken to this point in his social media message @BobAvakianOfficial REVOLUTION #106:

    As we revcoms (revolutionary communists) have made clear in the Declaration WE NEED AND WE DEMAND: A WHOLE NEW WAY TO LIVE, A FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT SYSTEM: “So long as we are still living under the rule of this system of capitalism-imperialism, we will defend people against attacks on their lives and on the rights that are supposed to be guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution.”

    So, what rights based on the U.S. Constitution are supposed to apply whether during an arrest or in any contact with police or government agencies? How should people defend their rights individually and collectively, and what kind of culture is needed to resist the government forces of repression?

    The Right to Remain Silent—Don't Talk

    When facing agents of government repression (here we are talking about the local police and prosecutors, state or federal law enforcement or various government agencies), the principle of "Don't Talk" is an important legal principle overall, and it is crucial in fighting to protect the various movements of resistance and of revolution from government repression. This principle is stressed very strongly by criminal defense lawyers and civil rights organizations—you have a RIGHT to remain silent.

    Many legal rights organizations, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and National Lawyers Guild (NLG), have published materials to inform people of their rights. The most important thing they all advise is to assert your right to NOT answer questions. 

    For example, the following is from a brochure published by the ACLU of Southern California

    WHAT TO DO IF YOU’RE STOPPED BY POLICE, IMMIGRATION AGENTS OR THE FBI:
    YOUR RIGHTS 

    • You have the right to remain silent. If you wish to exercise that right, say so out loud.
    • You have the right to refuse to consent to a search of yourself, your car or your home.
    • If you are not under arrest, you have the right to calmly leave.
    • You have the right to a lawyer if you are arrested. Ask for one immediately.
    • Regardless of your immigration or citizenship status, you have constitutional rights.

    And the National Lawyers Guild advises what to do if an FBI agent or police officer knocks at the door:

    Do not open the door. State that you are going to remain silent. Do not answer any questions, or even give your name. Anything you say, no matter how seemingly harmless or insignificant, can be used against you or others. Ask the agents to slide their business cards under the door and tell them that your lawyer will contact them. If the agent or officer gives a reason for contacting you, take notes and give the information to your lawyer.15 

    What Harm Can Talking Do?

    There are many myths and lies promoted in the dominant culture and by the police themselves which leave people confused and feeling they have no choice but to cooperate. This is absolutely wrong and dangerous to any movements of resistance from among the people. 

    Myth #1—Cooperating will make the authorities go away.

    In fact, it often does just the opposite. After all, if they size someone up as a "talker" or weak link, they'll milk this person for all the information they can get. They may return with more questions or continue this line of questioning with others.

    Myth #2—Talking will prevent being arrested.

    The authorities promote the illusion that a person should try to "save their own hide" by cooperating and talking. In reality, as the ACLU and NLG underscore, in many circumstances talking may increase the chances of a person being busted, and may be sealing the case against himself/herself as well as others.

    Myth #3—As long as the information provided is harmless, there's nothing wrong with talking.

    When people don't know their rights and talk freely to the authorities, this can do great harm—no matter what information they provide.

    First of all, because the person doesn't know the full agenda of the authorities, he/she has no basis to evaluate whether or not information is "harmless." Even if the authorities claim to be investigating something that has nothing to do with your politics or political activities (or those of others), appearances can be deceiving. The authorities can and will twist any information to their advantage.

    Secondly, the act of talking encourages the authorities to pursue this tactic and go after others.

    Finally, and most importantly, talking fuels the government's efforts to eliminate any movements of opposition and dissent, while standing firm and not talking as a matter of principle contributes to building a culture of resistance and defiance.

    Myth #4—If I don't cooperate, won't it look like I have something to hide?

    According to the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR),

    This is one of the most frequently asked questions. The answer involves the nature of political "intelligence" investigations and the job of the FBI. Agents will try to make you feel that it will "look bad" if you don't cooperate with them. Many people not familiar with how the FBI operates worry about being uncooperative…. (T)hey [the FBI] are intent on learning about the habits, opinions, and affiliations of people not suspected of wrongdoing....

    They will do anything to get a person to talk: from good cop/bad cop approaches (aimed at getting the person to "open up" to the more sympathetic cop) to threats and outright brutality. They also use "mind games" such as saying that others have already informed on a person; or even going so far as falsely telling someone a family member has died in order to get the person to let down his/her guard and reveal information about themselves or others.

    Any information that a person provides—no matter how seemingly insignificant—can be twisted and used against that person themselves, or against people and organizations who expose and oppose the crimes of this system. The government has a long history of lying about the facts and fabricating "evidence" in order to frame movement activists and revolutionaries. They take intelligence gathered from a variety of sources and use it in the most sinister ways, even including murder. Consequently, there is no reason to be in the least defensive about not talking to or cooperating with authorities.

    If a person thinks that he/she can just "bullshit" an agent, this too is a trap. The investigators are trained to be "friendly" and listen to people's stories. To quote a textbook on interrogation techniques, "Letting the subject tell a few lies, and letting him apparently get away with them, is an excellent technique, and works well with many types of subjects. We have seen that lying on the part of the subject works to the advantage of the interrogator...." The NLG has pointed out:

    Keep in mind that although they are allowed to lie to you, lying to a government agent is a crime. Remaining silent is not. The safest things to say are "I am going to remain silent," "I want to speak to my lawyer," and " do not consent to a search." [emphasis added]16

    Conclusion

    As spoken to throughout this article, as part of trying to beat down movements of resistance and of revolution, agents of the government (police, FBI, prosecutors, etc.) have developed methods to trick, intimidate and brutalize people into giving up legal rights and protections established by the legal system in this country. This basic dynamic and truth needs to be clearly understood, and if various organizations and movements are serious about the challenges they face, they need to grapple with how—mainly by relying on mass movements of the people—to resist such repression.

    History has shown that when the decent people refuse to concede the moral authority on what is right and what is wrong, they are better able to withstand repression and continue to develop resistance. If they do not take this approach, they find themselves in a situation where: That which you do not resist and mobilize to stop, you will learn—or be forced—to accept. Part of building a culture of defiance and resistance among people standing up against fascism and the crimes of this system is refusing to allow the government to either intimidate or bamboozle people into giving up resistance, and refusing in any way to enter into complicity with such intimidation and repression.

    In this context, the legal principles underlying "Don't Talk" take on heightened importance. Those confronted by police agents should not be bamboozled into giving up the legal rights they do have, as this will only lead to strengthening the repressive apparatus of the state, and help to undercut the ability to struggle against the crimes of this system and to build a movement for revolution to overthrow this system and bring about a fundamentally different and much better system. 

    Immigrant Legal Resource Center red cards

     

    Red Cards

    Red cards are being distributed by the thousands in immigrant communities throughout the country, advising people of their rights. This is the text of the “red cards.” 

    I do not wish to speak with you, answer your questions, or sign or hand you any documents based on my 5th Amendment rights under the United States Constitution. I do not give you permission to enter my home based on my 4th Amendment rights under the United States Constitution unless you have a warrant to enter, signed by a judge or magistrate with my name on it that you slide under the door. I do not give you permission to search any of my belongings based on my 4th Amendment rights. I choose to exercise my constitutional rights. These cards are available to citizens and noncitizens alike.

    • DO NOT OPEN THE DOOR if an immigration agent is knocking on the door.
    • DO NOT ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS from an immigration agent if they try to talk to you. You have the right to remain silent.
    • DO NOT SIGN ANYTHING without first speaking to a lawyer. You have the right to speak with a lawyer.
    • If you are outside of your home, ask the agent if you are free to leave and if they say yes, leave calmly.
    • GIVE THIS CARD TO THE AGENT. If you are inside of your home, show the card through the window or slide it under the door.

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. Operation Backfire: A Survival Guide for Environmental and Animal Rights Activists, National Lawyers Guild, 2009 [back]

    2. “Know Your Rights! What to Do if Questioned by Police, FBI, Customs Agents or Immigration Officers,” by National Lawyers Guild, S.F. Bay Area Chapter, ACLU of Northern California and the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC-SF), 2004  [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    U.S. CONSTITUTION: AN EXPLOITERS’ VISION OF FREEDOM—ADDED NOTES (AND BRIEF INTRODUCTION)

    Brief Introduction:

    The following article by Bob Avakian was originally published in 1987. We are republishing it now, because it remains highly relevant in terms of understanding the basic nature of this system we live under—the system of capitalism-imperialism—and the role of the U.S. Constitution as the legal and political basis for this system of ruthless exploitation, murderous oppression and massive destruction. In this republished version, Bob Avakian has provided some Added Notes at the end of the article, to further clarify important points.

    * * * * *

    James Madison, who was the main author of the Constitution of the United States, was also an upholder of slavery and the interests of the slaveowners in the United States. Madison, the fourth president of the United States, not only wrote strongly in defense of the Constitution, he also strongly defended the part of the Constitution that declared the slaves to be only three-fifths human beings (that provided for the slaves to be counted this way for the purposes of deciding on representation and taxation of the states—Article I, Section 2, 3 of the Constitution).

    In writing this defense, Madison praised "the compromising expedient of the Constitution" which treats the slaves as "inhabitants, but as debased by servitude below the equal level of free inhabitants; which regards the slave as divested of two-fifths of the man." Madison explained: "The true state of the case is that they partake of both these qualities: being considered by our laws, in some respects, as persons, and in other respects as property.... This is in fact their true character. It is the character bestowed on them by the laws under which they live; and it will not be denied that these are the proper criterion." Madison got to the heart of the matter, the essence of what the U.S. Constitution is all about, when in the course of upholding the decision to treat slaves as three-fifths human beings he agrees with the following principle: "Government is instituted no less for protection of the property than of the persons of individuals."1 Property rights—that is the basis on which outright slavery as well as other forms of exploitation, discrimination, and oppression have been consistently upheld. And over the 200 years that this Constitution has been in force, down to today, despite the formal rights of persons it proclaims, and even though the Constitution has been amended to outlaw slavery where one person actually owns another as property, the U.S. Constitution has always remained a document that upholds and gives legal authority to a system in which the masses of people, or their ability to work, have been used as wealth-creating property for the profit of the few.

    The abolition of slavery through the Civil War meant the elimination of one form of exploitation and the further development and extension of other forms of exploitation. As I wrote in Democracy: Can't We Do Better Than That?, "despite the efforts of abolitionists and the resistance and revolts of the slaves themselves—and their heroic fighting in the Civil War itself—it was not fought by the Union government in the North, and its president, Lincoln, for the purpose of abolishing the atrocity of slavery in some moral sense.... The Civil War arose out of the conflict between two modes of production, the slave system in the South and the capitalist system centered in the North; this erupted into open antagonism, warfare, when it was no longer possible for these two modes of production to co-exist within the same country."2 The victory of the North over the South in the U.S. Civil War represented the victory of the capitalist system over the slave system. It represented the triumph of the capitalist form of using people as a means of creating wealth. Under a system of outright slavery, the slave is literally the property of the slaveowner. Under capitalism, slavery becomes wage-slavery: The exploited class of workers is not owned by the exploiting class of capitalists (the owners of factories, land, etc.), but the workers are in a position where they must sell their ability to work to a capitalist in order to earn a wage. Capitalism needs a mass of workers that is "free," in a two-fold sense: They must be "free" of all means to live (all means of production), except their ability to work; and they must not be bound to a particular owner, a particular site, a particular guild, etc.—they must be "free" to do whatever work is demanded of them, they must be "free" to move from place to place, and "free" to be hired and fired according to the needs of capital! If they cannot enrich a capitalist through working, then the workers cannot work, they cannot earn a wage. But even if they cannot find a capitalist to exploit their labor, even if they are unemployed, they still remain under the domination of the capitalist class and of the process of capitalist accumulation of wealth—the proletarians (the workers) are dependent on the capitalist class and the capitalist system for their very lives, so long as the capitalist system rules. It is this rule, this system of exploitation, that the U.S. Constitution has upheld and enforced, all the more so after outright slavery was abolished through the Civil War.

    But here is another very important fact: In the concrete conditions of the U.S. coming out of the Civil War, and for some time afterward, wage-slavery was not the only major form of exploitation in force in the U.S. Up until very recently (until the 1950s), millions of Black people were exploited like serfs on Southern plantations, working as sharecroppers and tenant farmers to enrich big landowners (and bankers and other capitalists). A whole system of laws—commonly known as Jim Crow laws—were enforced to maintain this relationship of exploitation and oppression: Black people throughout the South—and really throughout the whole country—were subjected to the open discrimination, brutality, and terror that such laws allowed and encouraged. All this, too, was upheld and enforced by the Constitution and its interpretation and application by the highest political and legal authorities in the U.S. And, over the past several decades, when the great majority of Black people have been uprooted from the land in the South and have moved into the cities of the North (and South), they have still been discriminated against, forcibly segregated, and continually subjected to brutality and terror even while some formal civil rights have been extended to them.

    Once again, this is in accordance with the interests of the ruling capitalist class and capitalist system. It is consistent with the principle enunciated by James Madison: Governments must protect the property no less than the persons of individuals. In fact, what Madison obviously meant—and what the reality of the U.S. has clearly been—is that the government must protect the property of white people, especially the wealthy white people, more than the rights of Black people. It must never be forgotten that for most of their history in what is now the United States of America Black people were the property of white people, particularly wealthy plantation owners. Even after this outright slavery was abolished, Black people have never been allowed to achieve equality with whites: they have been held down, maintained as an oppressed nation, and denied the right of self-determination. Capitalism cannot exist without the oppression of nations, and this is all the more so when capitalism develops into its highest stage: monopoly capitalism-imperialism. If the history of the United States has demonstrated anything, it has demonstrated this.

    The Heritage They Won’t Renounce

    The ruling class of the U.S. today—above all the U.S. imperialists, the large-scale capitalists and international exploiters who dominate the U.S. and most of the world—are indeed, as they proclaim, the direct and worthy descendants of their “Founding Fathers.” And this is why the ruling class and its political representatives, while they feel obliged to say that they are opposed to slavery today (at least in the U.S. itself), solemnly praise and celebrate slave owners and upholders of slavery who were so prominent among the “Founding Fathers” and played so central a part in the establishment of the system in the U.S.: men like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison.

    These imperialists will never admit that their “Founding Fathers” established a system of government that, in its very foundation, is based on oppression and exploitation. They will never admit that their Constitution is the legal instrument for enforcing that exploitation and oppression. They cannot admit this, any more than they can admit their much-vaunted wealth and power has been established and built up by stealing land and resources from the native peoples (and Mexico) through extortion and outright murderous means; by trading in human flesh and harnessing human beings in slave labor; by pitilessly exploiting immigrants in their millions as wage-slaves; by robbing and plundering throughout the world, particularly Latin America, Africa, and Asia (what today is generally called the Third World). They cannot acknowledge that, while the forms of slavery have changed, the U.S. has, from the beginning and down to today, remained a society where enslavement, in one form or another, has been at the very heart of the economic system and the very basis of the political structure.

    There are many (including even Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall) who argue that, because of the upholding of slavery in the Constitution—and other injustices, such as excluding women from voting, and the treatment of the Indians—the Constitution was not such a great document when it was written, but it has been made great through the history of the U.S. and the struggles to create a more perfect Union and a more perfect Constitution. In other words, the Constitution may have had defects in some important ways when it was originally conceived, but the miracle of it is that the Constitution has within it provisions for changing and improving it—for extending democracy and rights to those previously excluded. And, some will add, while the Constitution upholds property rights, it also upholds individual and civil rights (even the statement from Madison cited at the beginning of this article stresses that, some might argue). Let’s look more deeply at these questions.

    Extension of the Constitution … Extension of Bourgeois Domination

    The extension of constitutional rights and protections to those previously excluded from them has gone together, in an overall way, with the extension of bourgeois (capitalist) relations and their dominance throughout the U.S. And, at the same time, it has gone hand-in-hand with the continuation of the oppression of Black people, of Native Americans, of Latinos and immigrants from Latin America (and elsewhere), of the oppression of women, and other forms of oppression and exploitation. All this is not in contradiction to but is consistent with the fundamental principles on which the Constitution is based and the way in which it treats the relationship between the rights of property and the rights of individuals.*

    It is noteworthy that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution (echoing the 5th Amendment) has as its pivotal point the provision that no State may “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.” Especially in the period since World War 2, this amendment has been used as a major part of the basis to extend civil rights for Black people, for women, and for others discriminated against. Yet this amendment was passed right after the Civil War, in 1866; and for many decades this amendment was not used to combat racial or sexual discrimination. Instead, “For many years the Supreme Court applied the due-process clause mainly to protect business interests against state regulatory legislation.”3 It was only beginning after World War 1, and more fully after World War 2, that the 14th Amendment was applied in a significant way to the questions of racial and sexual discrimination. Thus, “in a long series of cases” beginning in 1925, the Supreme Court “gradually expanded its definition of due process so as to include most of the guarantees of personal liberties in the Federal Bill of Rights and has protected them from state impairment. A similar development occurred with respect to the equal-protection clause.”4 These changes in Supreme Court decisions were part of larger changes in ruling-class policy. But these resulted not from some brilliant new legal insight, nor from some sudden flash of moral awakening within the ruling class. Rather, they resulted from the changed situation of Black people in U.S. society and, more decisively, from the situation and needs of the ruling imperialists.

    As noted earlier, the masses of Black people have undergone a dramatic change in their particular conditions of existence—and of oppression—in the U.S. This began during and immediately after World War 1 but developed fully during and after World War 2. Demand for labor in war production and other strategic industry, followed after World War 2 by sweeping changes in Southern agriculture—called forth by technological changes and international economic competition—drove millions and millions of Black people from the rural South to the urban ghettos of the North and South, and into the most exploited sections of the proletariat. At the same time, the U.S. imperialists emerged not only victorious but greatly strengthened from world war that devastated those countries which were much more directly and centrally involved. So, after World War 2 U.S. imperialism was everywhere, scooping up the former colonial possessions of the prior colonial powers and establishing U.S. neocolonial domination in the name of freedom and (usually) in the guise of allowing formal independence. In this situation, it was not so necessary—nor was it so helpful—to openly and blatantly treat Black people as “second-class citizens” in the U.S. itself. So, over the period of the next several decades, concessions were made to civil rights demands and struggles at the same time as deception, vicious repression, and the promotion of “loyal and responsible Negro leaders” were carried out to keep things firmly under the control of the ruling class and in the service of its larger interests. Similarly, recent decades have seen political and legal changes that have brought certain extensions of formal rights to women and certain concessions to their battle against oppression. These have corresponded to significant changes in society and the world, including the fact that in only a small percentage of U.S. families is it any longer the case that the family is supported by just the man working. But, again, these concessions have been confined within limits that fundamentally conform to the interests and needs of the ruling class in the face of changing conditions in the U.S. and the world.

    Would anyone dare say that, because of these changes and concessions, inequality and injustice have been eliminated in the U.S.? The fact is, none of this has in any way eliminated, or come close to eliminating, discrimination against Black people, their overall conditions of oppression, their status as an oppressed nation. Nor have the ruling imperialists ceased to oppress the Native Americans—they have never even stopped trying to cheat and rob them of valuable land and resources. Nor have these imperialists ceased to discriminate against and viciously exploit other national minorities and immigrants. Nor, despite the constitutional amendment (the 19th, in 1919) giving them the right to vote and other concessions to “women’s rights,” have women been granted equality—there has been no end to the subjugation and degradation they have been subjected to: The oppression of women remains a foundation stone of U.S. society, as indeed it must so long as a system of class domination and exploitation is in force. Today, 200 years after the U.S. Constitution first took effect, and after all the changes and amendments, no one can seriously and reasonably argue that the various kinds of oppression that I have spoken to here do not exist or are only a minor aspect of the situation. No one can seriously and reasonably argue that they are not a basic and deeply rooted feature of American society.

    The reason for this is rooted in the very reality and nature of the economic system in the U.S. and the political system that upholds and enforces this economic system, including the Constitution as the legal “cement” of the political structure. The fundamental reason why the “extension” of constitutional rights to those previously excluded from them has not put an end to exploitation, inequality, and oppression is this: The essence of the capitalist economic system is not the competition of commodity owners, all vying equally in the marketplace (equal opportunity for all). The essence is the exploitation of labor as wage-labor, the command by capital over labor power (the ability to do work) as a commodity—a unique commodity—that creates wealth through its use.** (As a dockworker told me years ago: No one gets rich working; the only way to get rich is by making other people work for you.) And the essence of the political structure that goes along with and protects this capitalist economic system is not freedom and democracy for all, regardless of wealth and social position. The essence is the dictatorship of the bourgeois class—its monopoly of political power and armed force—over those it dominates in the economic system, especially the proletariat. Thus, the right to vote and other formal rights for the proletariat and other oppressed masses are in no way in fundamental opposition to the economic and political system of capitalism and bourgeois dictatorship.

    Bourgeois Democracy—Bourgeois Dictatorship

    Bourgeois democracy presents itself as classless democracy: It proclaims equality for all. Thus, the U.S. Constitution does not say that different classes of people shall have unequal wealth and power; rather, it sets forth a charter that appears to treat everyone the same, regardless of wealth and social status. Yet there never has been, and never could be, a capitalist society without tremendous differences in wealth and power, without fundamental class divisions and antagonisms. In fact, a capitalist society without these things is not even conceivable. And in reality, democracy in capitalist society can only be bourgeois democracy. This means there is democracy—equal political rights and the power to make fundamental decisions—only among the capitalist class, the ruling class. For the rest, and for the proletariat especially, bourgeois democracy means dictatorship: It means being ruled over by the capitalists, even while being allowed to vote and even while being governed by a Constitution that sets forth laws that are said to be applied, equally, to all. How can this be?

    First, as for voting, as I pointed out in Democracy: Can’t We Do Better Than That?:

    On the most obvious level, to be a serious candidate for any major office in a country like the U.S. requires millions of dollars—a personal fortune or, more often, the backing of people with that kind of money. Beyond that, to become known and be taken seriously depends on favorable exposure in the mass media (favorable at least in the sense that you are presented as within the framework of responsible—that is, acceptable politics)…. By the time “the people express their will through voting,” both the candidates they have to choose among and the “issues” that deserve “serious consideration” have been selected out by someone else: the ruling class….

    Further, and even more fundamentally, to “get anywhere” once elected—both to advance one’s own career and to “get anything done”—it is necessary to fit into the established mold and work within the established structures.5

    But that is not all:

    If, however, the electoral process in bourgeois society does not represent the exercise of sovereignty by the people, it generally does play an important role in maintaining the sovereignty—the dictatorship—of the bourgeoisie and the continuation of capitalist society. This very electoral process itself tends to cover over the basic class relations—and class antagonisms—in society, and serves to give formal, institutionalized expression to the political participation of atomized individuals in the perpetuation of the status quo. This process not only reduces people to isolated individuals but at the same time reduces them to a passive position politically and defines the essence of politics as such atomized passivity—as each person, individually, in isolation from everyone else, giving his/her approval to this or to that option, all of which options have been formulated and presented by an active power standing above these atomized masses of “citizens.”… [T]he very acceptance of the electoral process as the quintessential political act reinforces acceptance of the established order and works against any radical rupture with, to say nothing of the actual overturning of, that order.6

    And let us remember that one of the main reasons for which the U.S. Constitution was “ordained and established,” as proclaimed in its “Preamble,” was to prevent social upheaval and the overturning of the order upheld by that Constitution—to “insure domestic tranquility.”

    The same can be said of the other aspects of bourgeois democracy and the kind of rights set forth in the U.S. Constitution (including its “Bill of Rights”): They have the purpose and function of reinforcing the rule of the bourgeoisie and keeping political activity within limits acceptable to the bourgeoisie. Thus, “the much-vaunted freedom of expression in the ‘democratic countries’ is not in opposition to but is encompassed by and confined within the actual exercise of dictatorship by the bourgeoisie. This is for two basic reasons—because the ruling class has a monopoly on the means of molding public opinion and because its monopoly of armed force puts it in a position to suppress, as violently as necessary, any expression of ideas, as well as any action, that poses a serious challenge to the established order.”7 The history of the U.S., like the history of all other “democratic” bourgeois dictatorships, is full of graphic illustrations of just how true the above-quoted statement is!

    Formal equality—the treatment of all persons as equal, and specifically as “equal before the law,” without regard to wealth or social position—in bourgeois society actually covers over the relationship of complete subordination, exploitation, and oppression to which the proletariat and masses of people are subjected. If a small group—the capitalist class—controls the important means of creating wealth, then in reality they have the power of life and death over those who control little or none of these. To have such power over other people is, in essence, to hold them in an enslaved condition, whether or not the chains are literal and visible. In such a situation—which is the fundamental condition of capitalist society—how can there be anything but profound inequality economically, socially, and politically? And with such a fundamental division, with such fundamental inequality, there can never be anything but exploitation, oppression, domination, and dictatorship.

    With regard to the law, this will manifest itself in two main ways. First, those who dominate society economically will dominate in deciding, through the political structure, what the laws will be. They will insure that the laws serve their interests. And second, the actual application and enforcement of the law will discriminate in favor of those with wealth and power and against those without them—and even more so against oppressed nationalities, women, and others who are “the last of the last” in society. Everyday life in any capitalist society proves this over and over. Thus, once again, as with the right to vote and other constitutional rights in a bourgeois-democratic republic, formal equality before the law expresses itself, in reality, as profound inequality—and more—as something confined within and conforming to bourgeois domination and dictatorship.

    The basic difference between the bourgeoisie’s view of freedom and democracy on the one hand, and the striving of oppressed masses for an end to oppressive conditions on the other hand, is sharply drawn in recent events in Haiti, the Philippines, and South Korea. The oppressed masses (and students and other revolutionary intellectuals) want some kind of fundamental change in the social system and a breaking of the chains of imperialist domination in their countries. But the bourgeois opposition leaders and parties want only the recognition of bourgeois-democratic provisions and procedures—with elections the highest expression of political activity. Most of all, they want the sharing of power more broadly and “equally” among the upper classes—really, they want their chance to hold the reins of power—while leaving the social system and imperialist domination intact. As for the imperialists, where they become convinced of the need for change in such situations, they make every effort to keep it confined within the framework of imperialist domination and bourgeois rule. Indeed, they try to use such situations to strengthen and perhaps “refine” the apparatus of bourgeois politics—and, above all, of repression—in the countries involved.

    This brings us to a most fundamental point that is so often ignored or glossed over in discussions and debates about democracy in countries like the U.S.: The fact is that even the extent to which rights are allowed to the nonruling classes in imperialist countries depends on a situation where, in large parts of the world under imperialist domination, the masses of people are subjected to much more open and murderous repression. In short,

    The platform of democracy in the imperialist countries (worm-eaten as it is) rests on fascist terror in the oppressed nations: the real guarantors of bourgeois democracy in the U.S. are not the constitutional scholar and the Supreme Court justice, but the Brazilian torturer, the South African cop, and the Israeli pilot; the true defenders of the democratic tradition are not on the portraits in the halls of the Western capitols, but are Marcos, Mobutu, and the dozens of generals from Turkey to Taiwan, from South Korea to South America, all put and maintained in power and backed up by the military force of the U.S. and its imperialist partners.8,***

    But, at the same time, the imperialist rulers and ardent worshippers of bourgeois democracy go to great lengths to try to cover over, or explain away, the brutal repression “at home” that is so essential to the functioning of the system and the maintenance of the established order:

    For there is vicious repression and state terror carried out continually—and not only in times of serious crisis or social upheaval—in the imperialist countries; it is carried out specifically against those who do not support but oppose the established order, or who simply cannot be counted on to be pacified by the normal workings of the imperialist system—those whose conditions are desperate and whose life situation is explosive anyway.

    In the U.S. the hundreds of police shootings of oppressed people, particularly Blacks and other minority nationalities, every year; the fact that jails are overwhelmingly filled with poor people, the greatest number again being Black and other minority nationalities—it is an amazing but true statistic that one out of every thirteen Black people in the U.S. will be arrested each year (and Blacks are incarcerated eight and one-half times as frequently as whites)!—and the widespread use of drugs, surgical techniques, and other means to repress and terrorize prisoners (as well as an astounding number of people not in jail, including allegedly recalcitrant children); the use of welfare and other so-called social service agencies to harass and control poor people down to the most intimate details of their personal lives; this, and much more, is part of the daily life experience of millions of people in the major imperialist countries. Along with all this, of course, is the use of the state apparatus for direct political repression….

    In times of severe crisis and social strain, of course, all this is carried out more intensively and extensively…. Already, right now in the U.S., to cite one important aspect of this, hundreds of thousands of immigrants, “illegal” and “legal,” are being subjected to a campaign of terror—including raids at their places of work and homes, the sudden and forcible separation of parents from children, and the deportation of large numbers of refugees back to the waiting arms of death squads and other government assassins in countries like El Salvador. The same kind of thing is also being directed against immigrants in France, West Germany, England, and other imperialist democracies.

    Through all this, while overt political repression by the state is in one sense the clearest indication of the class content of democracy—in the imperialist countries as well as elsewhere—in another sense the daily, and often seemingly arbitrary, terror carried out against the lower strata in these imperialist countries concentrates the connection between the normal workings of the system and the political (that is, class) nature of the state.9

    A New and Far Greater Vision of Freedom

    In the course of this article so far, in speaking to some essential questions concerning the U.S. Constitution and the system it upholds, I have answered some of the main arguments made in defense of this Constitution and this system, including the argument that the Constitution, if not perfect, is perfectible—that it can be continually improved and the rights it establishes can be extended to those previously excluded. Before concluding, I want to briefly address some of the other main arguments made on behalf of—or in defense of—this Constitution and the principles and vision it embodies.

    “This Constitution establishes a law of the land that is applicable to all—it establishes a government of laws, not of people.” This is closely linked to the principle of “equality before the law.” What is meant by “a government of laws, not of people” is that no one is “above the law” and that what is allowed and what is forbidden are set forth before all, in one set of regulations binding on everyone, and this can be changed only through the procedures established for making such changes. A “government of people” refers to a notion of a government where it is the will and the word of certain people—a king, a despot, a small group of tyrants, etc.—that determine what is allowed and what is forbidden, and where this can and will change according to the dictates and the whims of such rulers: There is no common and clearly spelled-out standard binding on all, even on the political leaders and the powerful and influential in society.

    Like all principles of bourgeois democracy, this notion of “a government of laws, not of people” misses and obscures the essential question. First of all,

    “the rule of law” can be part of a dictatorship, of one kind or another, and in the most general sense it always is—even where it may appear that power is exercised without or above the law, laws (in the sense of a systematized code that people in society are obliged to conform to, whether written or unwritten) will still exist and play a part in enforcing the rule of the dominant class. Conversely, all states, all dictatorships, include laws in one form or another.10

    Most fundamentally, the question is: What is the character and the class content of the laws, what system do they uphold and enforce, which class interests do they represent—of which class dictatorship, bourgeois or proletarian, are they the expression and instrument—and toward what end are they contributing—the maintenance of class division and domination, exploitation and oppression, or the final elimination of class divisions, of all oppressive social divisions, and of social antagonisms? In short, the essential question is not “a government of laws vs. a government of people,” it is which people—which class—rules, and what laws are in force, in the service of what ends?

    “‘We The People,’ that is the heart of this Constitution and the genius of this Constitution: It establishes a government of, by and for all the people.” As a matter of historical fact, this opening phrase of the Constitution, “We the people of the United States,” was not the product of some lofty desire by the “framers” of the Constitution to set forth some universal principle of popular sovereignty. It was the product of their desire to overcome the problem of States posing their own sovereignty against that of the Federal Government—and the desire to avoid the specific problem of not knowing which States would ratify the Constitution: “The Preamble of the Articles of Confederation had named all the states in order from north to south. How was the [Constitutional] Convention to enumerate the participating states without knowing which would ratify? In a brilliant flash of inspiration, the Convention began with the words, ‘We the People of the United States…do ordain and establish this Constitution….’”11

    More importantly, the larger historical context and the actual content of this proclamation—“We The People”—must be made clear. The founding of the United States of America as an independent country represented not just the breaking away from domination by a foreign power. It also meant breaking away from a form of government that vested great power in the person of the monarchy—even while it ultimately served the interests of the bourgeoisie and the landed “nobility.” In general, the rights and the restrictions of power established in the Constitution of the newly founded United States revolved around preventing arbitrary rule by despots and the concentration of too much power in one person or one part of the government. The “separation of powers” and the “checks and balances” of different branches of government was seen as a way of insuring that the government would serve the interests of the capitalist class and (at that time) the slaveowners as a whole. It is in this light that “We the people of the United States,” in the “Preamble” of the Constitution, must be understood. Obviously, “We the people of the United States” did not include all those who were expressly excluded from the process of selecting the government and endorsing the Constitution. For, “Even on the most obvious level, how could the government of the newly formed United States, for example, be considered to have derived its powers ‘from the consent of the governed’ when, at the time of the formation of the United States of America, a majority of the people ‘governed’—included slaves, Indians, women, men who did not meet various property requirements, and others—did not even have the right to vote…to say nothing of the real power to govern and determine the direction of society?”12

    Bourgeois ruling classes generally speak in the name of the people, all the people. From their standpoint, it may make a certain amount of sense: They do, after all, rule over the masses of people. But from a more basic and more objective standpoint, their claim to represent all the people is a deception. If it was a deception at the time of the founding of the United States and the adoption of its Constitution, it is all the more so now. For now the rule of the capitalists is in fundamental antagonism with the interests of the great majority of people, not just in a particular country, but all over the world. Now the decisive question is not overcoming economic and political obstacles to the development of capitalism and its corresponding political system. The time when that was on the historical agenda is long since passed. What is now on the historical agenda is the overthrow of capitalism and the final elimination of all systems of exploitation, all oppressive social relations, all class distinctions, through the revolution of the exploited class under capitalism, the proletariat.

    To get a very stark sense of just how historically conditioned—how long since outmoded and completely reactionary—are the interests and the paramount concerns of the "Founding Fathers" and their descendants, the ruling imperialists of today, let us consider the fact that, in writing their Constitution, Madison and others "For theoretical inspiration...leaned heavily on Locke and on Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws. Both writers had insisted on the need for separation of powers in order to prevent tyranny; in Montesquieu's view even the representatives of the people in the legislature could not be trusted with unlimited power."13 In reading over Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws I could not help but be struck by how thoroughly his frame of reference is that of a bygone age and his outlook that of exploiting classes whose period of historical ascendancy is long since past. As a glaring illustration, consider the following:

    If I had to justify our right to enslave Negroes, this is what I would say: Since the peoples of Europe have exterminated those of America, they have had to enslave those of Africa in order to use them to clear and cultivate such a vast expanse of land.

    Sugar would be too expensive if it weren't harvested by slaves.

    Those in question are black from the tip of their toes to the top of their heads; and their noses so flattened that it is almost impossible to feel sorry for them.

    It is inconceivable that God, who is a very wise being, could have placed a soul, especially a good soul, in an all-black body....

    One proof of the fact that Negroes don't have any common sense is that they get more excited about a string of glass beads than about gold, which, in civilized countries, is so dearly prized.

    It is impossible that these people are men; because if we thought of them as men, one would begin to think that we ourselves are not Christians.14,****

    Let the "Founding Fathers" and their descendants draw theoretical inspiration from the likes of Montesquieu! Let them defend slavery and modern-day exploitation on the ground of property rights, taking their lead from the likes of James Madison, the main author of the Constitution. As for the proletariat, our goal is "Marx's view of the complete abolition of bourgeois property relations—and all relations in which human beings confront each other as owners (or non-owners) of property rather than through conscious and voluntary association."15

    For the exploiting classes, and in a system under their rule, the "bottom line" is to reduce the masses of people to mere wealth-creating property—and today, under the domination of the imperialists, the greatest of all exploiters, the mass of humanity is treated as merely a means to amass even greater wealth and power in the hands of, and for the profit of, so few. And at what cost! This cost must be measured in massive human suffering, degradation, and destruction. Imagine the even greater cost in human suffering, degradation, and destruction that will have to be paid unless and until the oppressed and exploited victims of this system, who are the great majority of humanity, rise up and overthrow this system and finally put an end to all social relations of exploitation and oppression.

    In conclusion, The Constitution of the United States is an exploiters' vision of freedom. It is a charter for a society based on exploitation, on slavery in one form or another. The rights and freedoms it proclaims are subordinate to and in the service of the system of exploitation it upholds. This Constitution has been and continues to be applied in accordance with this vision and with the interests of the ruling class of this system: In its application it has become more and more fully the instrument of bourgeois domination, dictatorship, oppression, conquest, and plunder.

    Our answer is clear to those who argue: Even if The Constitution of the United States is not perfect, it is the best that has been devised—it sets a standard to be striven for. Our answer is: Why should we aim so low, when we have The Communist Manifesto to set a far higher standard of what humanity can strive for—and is capable of achieving—a far greater vision of freedom.*****

     

    NOTES

    1. Quotes from James Madison are from the Federalist Paper No. 54 in The Federalist Papers (New York: New American Library, 1961), pp. 336-341, especially pp. 339 and 337. [back]

    2. Bob Avakian, Democracy: Can't We Do Better Than That? (Chicago: Banner Press, 1986), pp. 110-11. [back]

    3. Edward Conrad Smith, editor, The Constitution of the United States with Case Summaries (New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 1979), p. 18. All citations in this article are from the essay “The Origins of the Constitution.” [back]

    4. Ibid., pp. 18-19. [back]

    5. Avakian, Democracy, p. 69. [back]

    6. Ibid, p. 70. [back]

    7. Ibid, p. 71. [back]

    8. Lenny Wolff, The Science of Revolution: An Introduction (Chicago: RCP Publications, 1983), p. 184. [back]

    9. Avakian, Democracy, pp. 137-39. [back]

    10. Ibid., pp. 233-34. [back]

    11. Smith, Constitution of the U.S., p. 12. [back]

    12. Avakian, Democracy, p. 100. [back]

    13. Smith, Constitution of the U.S., p. 13. [back]

    14. Charles Montesquieu, De L'Esprit Des Lois, Paris: Garnier, 1927, livre 15, chapitre 5, "De L'Esclavage Des Negres" (The Spirit of the Laws, book 15, chapter 5, "On the Enslavement of Negroes"), my translation. [back]

    15. Avakian, Democracy, p. 212. [back]

    Added Notes by the Author, Spring 2023

    * A major factor underlying this “extension of constitutional rights and protections to those previously excluded from them” has—especially since the second half of the 20th century—been the increasing globalization of the capitalist-imperialist economy, a worldwide system of exploitation ensnaring literally billions of people, and in particular super-exploitation of masses of people, including more than 150 million children, in the Third World of Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and Asia. The relationship of this worldwide exploitation, and super-exploitation, to the situation in the U.S. itself—particularly with regard to the economic structure and social and class relations within this country—is analyzed in depth in the paper by Raymond Lotta Imperialist Parasitism and Class-Social Recomposition in the U.S. From the 1970s to Today: An Exploration of Trends and Changes, which is available at revcom.us. The political dimensions of this are explored in my article Imperialist Parasitism and “Democracy”: Why So Many Liberals and Progressives Are Shameless Supporters of “Their” Imperialism (also available at revcom.us), where the following is made clear:

    [T]his imperialist plunder provides the material basis for a certain stability, at least in “normal times” in the imperialist “home country” (with the U.S. a prime example of this). This relative stability, in turn, makes it possible for the ruling class to allow a certain amount of dissent and political protest—so long as this remains within the confines of, or at least does not significantly threaten, the “law and order” that serves and enforces the fundamental interests of this ruling class.

    At the same time, as sharply demonstrated in mass uprisings which do call into question that “law and order” and/or defy allegiance to the imperialist interests of this system—such as the mass outpouring against police terror in 2020, and urban rebellions and mass opposition to the Vietnam war in the 1960s—the rulers of this country will frequently respond to such opposition with severe repression and murderous retribution.  For example, the city of Wilmington, in Biden’s home state of Delaware, was placed under martial law for months during the 1960s upsurge against the oppression of Black people, and a number of members of the Black Panther Party, most prominently Fred Hampton, were murdered by police, along with many Black people taking part in urban uprisings in that period, while militant mass resistance against the Vietnam war and rebellions among middle class youth and students were in some cases subjected to a vicious, and at times murderous, response by police and National Guard troops.

    It should never be forgotten, or overlooked, that the “law and order” that enforces this relative stability has included the regular murder of Black people, as well as Latinos, by police—resulting in the fact that the number of Black people who have been killed by police in the years since 1960 is greater than the thousands of Black people who were lynched during the period of Jim Crow segregation and Ku Klux Klan terror, before the 1960s. It should also not be overlooked that the U.S. has the highest rate of mass incarceration of any country in the world, with Black people and Latinos particularly subjected to this mass incarceration. [back]

    ** The point here, as emphasized in my work Breakthroughs: The Historic Breakthrough by Marx, and the Further Breakthrough with the New Communism, A Basic Summary, is that the essence of the capitalist economy, and the source of capitalist “wealth” and “economic growth,” is not a bunch of capitalist entrepreneurs and their “innovation,” or their “entrepreneurial genius.” It is the exploitation by the capitalists (the bourgeoisie) of wage-workers (the proletariat). This is different than the question of what is the driving force compelling the capitalists to continue to intensify the exploitation of the proletariat and to continually find new means of doing so. As also pointed out in Breakthroughs:

    Engels, in Anti-Dühring, discussed the motion of the fundamental contradiction of capitalism between socialized production and private appropriation. He pointed out that the working out of this contradiction assumes two different forms of motion that go into the dynamic process of this fundamental contradiction’s motion. Those two forms of motion are, on the one hand, the contradiction between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat that it exploits, and the other form of motion that Engels identified, importantly, is the contradiction between organization and anarchy, the organization of production on the level of, say, an enterprise—which may be highly organized, with lots of calculations going into it, market estimates and all kinds of things, and may be very tightly organized in terms of how the actual process of production is carried out on the level of the particular capitalist corporation, and so on—while, at the same time, this is in contradiction to the anarchy of production and of exchange in the society as a whole (or today in the world as a whole, today more than ever in the world as a whole). So you have these two forms of motion—and I’ll come back later to a crucial distinguishing aspect of the new communism: the importance of identifying the second form of motion of this fundamental contradiction, that is, the anarchy/organization contradiction, or the driving force of anarchy, as overall the principal and most essential form of the motion of the fundamental contradiction of capitalism....

    In this regard, in the article “On the ‘Driving Force of Anarchy’ and the Dynamics of Change,” Raymond Lotta cited this statement of mine:

    anarchic relations between capitalist producers, and not the mere existence of propertyless proletarians or the class contradiction as such, that drives these producers to exploit the working class on an historically more intensive and extensive scale. This motive force of anarchy is an expression of the fact that the capitalist mode of production represents the full development of commodity production and the law of value.

    And then there is this very important passage:

    Were it not the case that these capitalist commodity producers are separated from each other and yet linked by the operation of the law of value they would not face the same compulsion to exploit the proletariat—the class contradiction between bourgeoisie and proletariat could be mitigated. It is the inner compulsion of capital to expand which accounts for the historically unprecedented dynamism of this mode of production, a process which continually transforms value relations and which leads to crisis.

    (Breakthroughs is available at revcom.us; and the article by Raymond Lotta referred to here, “On the ‘Driving Force of Anarchy’ and the Dynamics of Change,” can be found in the online theoretical journal Demarcations, Issue Number 3.) [back]

    *** As noted in “Imperialist Parasitism and ‘Democracy’: Why So Many Liberals and Progressives Are Shameless Supporters of ‘Their’ Imperialism”:

    Some of the mass murderers in other countries who today play such a crucial role in serving the interests of U.S. imperialism throughout the world, and in making possible the maintenance of bourgeois democracy in this country itself (worm-eaten as it is indeed), are the same as they were 40 years ago, and some are different—but the essential reality remains that the “platform of democracy” in this country rests on fascist terror, along with ruthless exploitation, in the oppressed nations of the Third World (Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and Asia). [back]

    **** In relation to this statement by Montesquieu—and more generally his views on slavery—I am reproducing here the following “A Note from Bob Avakian: On Montesquieu, Slavery and the U.S. Constitution,” which appeared in Revolution #037, March 5, 2006, posted at revcom.us:

    Recently, Revolution ran an excerpt from a pamphlet I wrote, which was originally published in 1987, U.S. Constitution: An Exploiters' Vision of Freedom. In that excerpt, there is a quote from De L'Esprit Des Lois (or, in English, "The Spirit of the Laws") by Charles Montesquieu, an 18th–century French philosopher, who was one of the sources of inspiration for the U.S. Constitution, and in particular the theory of the separation of powers that is incorporated in that Constitution. The quote from this work of Montesquieu's, which was published in 1748, is one in which he recites an extreme and grotesquely racist justification for "the enslavement of the Negroes." In relation to this, it is not infrequently argued that Montesquieu was being ironic here, and deliberately overstating this argument, in order to, in effect, polemicize against the enslavement of African people, and that in general Montesquieu's writings express opposition to slavery. But the reality is not so simple as this, nor does this reflect what Montesquieu was essentially seeking to do in this part of "The Spirit of the Laws." It can be said that in "The Spirit of the Laws" Montesquieu's position is one of general opposition to slavery, and he indicates that slavery is not appropriate in countries like France; but, at the same time, he speaks to various circumstances in which he believes slavery can be justified or reasonable. For example, he argues that in the parts of the world, in particular the southern regions, where the climate is warmer, this climate makes people lazy (indolent), and slavery may be justified in order to get them to work (and he argues that in a despotic country, where people's political rights are already repressed, slavery may not be worse for people in that condition).

    This, and the general discussion of slavery that makes up this part (book 15) of "The Spirit of the Laws," is included in a broader discussion by Montesquieu on the nature of different societies and governments in different countries and parts of the world (this is found not only in book 15 but also books 14 and 16 of "The Spirit of the Laws") in which Montesquieu argues that geography and in particular climate plays a big part in determining the nature of different peoples and the character of their society and governing system. And it is important to understand that, although in this discussion Montesquieu makes logical refutation of certain arguments, including certain defenses of slavery, this is not a polemic for or against slavery, or other forms of government, and its character is not that of moral argumentation, so much as it is an attempt to explain why various practices, and various forms of society and government, have existed (and in some cases continue to exist) in various places.

    Another way to put this is that what Montesquieu is doing, in these parts of "The Spirit of the Laws" (and generally in this work), is attempting to make a kind of materialist analysis of these phenomena, including slavery in many places where it has existed—although it must be emphasized that this is not a thoroughly scientific, dialectical materialism but instead a rather crude and vulgar materialism which is marked, and marred, by a considerable amount of determinism: it is a kind of mechanical materialism that argues for a direct and straight-line (linear) connection between things like geography and climate and the character of society and government. It is a kind of materialism that does not adequately and accurately characterize the real motive forces in the development of human society, and in fact this kind of vulgar materialism has often been used to justify various forms of oppression, including colonial and imperialist domination. While we can, and should, recognize that, in the circumstances and time in which he wrote—about 250 years ago—there are aspects of what Montesquieu was seeking to do that were new and represented a break with the suffocating and obfuscating feudal outlook and conventions, it is very important to understand how Montesquieu's outlook and method were marked, and limited, by the social, and international, relations of which they were ultimately an expression: relations in which one part of society, and of the world, dominates and exploits others. And that is the basic point that was being emphasized in relation to Montesquieu and the U.S. Constitution, in the pamphlet U.S. Constitution: An Exploiters' Vision of Freedom.

    With regard to the specific passage that was cited in U.S. Constitution: An Exploiters' Vision of Freedom, "on the enslavement of the Negroes," there is, in fact, some reason to accept that Montesquieu does not actually agree with the justification for this enslavement that he summarizes, and that he is actually subjecting this kind of justification to some ironic and satirical treatment. A reasonable interpretation of Montesquieu's arguments, as he goes on in this part of "The Spirit of the Laws" (book 15), is that this kind of argument, about the non-human character of the Negroes, is not a valid argument, not one that actually justifies this enslavement. But then he does go on to explore the question of what might actually be reasonable justifications, in certain circumstances, for slavery; and, as spoken to above, he finds such justifications in situations such as those where there is a despotic government, or where—as he concludes, through an application of vulgar and determinist materialism—the warm climate makes people lazy and unwilling, on their own initiative, to work.

    Thus, in looking into and reflecting on this further, I would say that, while it is important to understand the complexity and nuance of what Montesquieu writes here—and it can be said that the way in which I cited Montesquieu in writing this pamphlet on the U.S. Constitution does not really or fully do that—it is not the case that what Montesquieu was doing here was actually making a case against the enslavement of the Negroes, or against slavery in general. Once again, it is important to keep in mind the fact that, although he was opposed to slavery on general principle, and declared that it was a good thing that it had been eliminated in his home country, France, and more generally in Europe, Montesquieu did not think slavery was wrong, or without justification, in all circumstances. And it also seems that Montesquieu did not hesitate to invest in companies involved in the slave trade. In this, there is a parallel with John Locke, the English philosopher and political theorist, who, as I pointed out in this same pamphlet (U.S. Constitution: An Exploiters' Vision of Freedom), was also a major influence in the conception of the U.S. Constitution. As I wrote in Democracy: Can't We Do Better Than That? (p. 29):

    "In sum, the society of which Locke was a theoretical exponent, as well as a practical political partisan, was a society based on wage-slavery and capitalist exploitation. And it is not surprising that, while he was opposed to slavery in England itself, he not only defended the institution of slavery, under certain circumstances, in the Second Treatise, but turned a not insignificant profit himself in the slave trade and helped to draw up the charter for a government headed by a slave-owning aristocracy in one of the American colonies. For as Marx sarcastically summarized: ‘The discovery of gold and silver in America, the extirpation, enslavement and entombment in mines of the aboriginal population, the beginning of the conquest and looting of the East Indies, the turning of Africa into a warren for the commercial hunting of black-skins, signalized the rosy dawn of the era of capitalist production.’" [back]

    ***** In the years since the writing of this article, I have devoted considerable work to the development of what is meant by this “far greater vision of freedom”—what it would mean “in real life.” One very important result of this is the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, which provides both a sweeping vision and a concrete blueprint for a radically different and emancipating society and world. This Constitution is available at revcom.us. [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    Readers’ Corner

    Updated

    Readers Corner

     

    Readers’ Corner highlights views that you, our readers, send us on the big questions about making revolution. Questions about building the movement for an actual revolution. Or responses to, and thoughts provoked by, the social media messages from Bob Avakian—the revolutionary leader and architect of the new communism. Thinking and questions you may have on other important documents from Bob Avakian (BA) and the Revcoms. As well as reflections on the new communism brought forward by BA, both overall and in relation to the urgent moment at hand. Now especially is a time for collective scientific grappling.

    Please send these to revolution.reports@yahoo.com. If your submission isn't reposted, it will still feed into our overall enriched understanding of what questions we should be speaking to.

    * * * * *

    To the revcoms, and those who want a better world

    Learning Science—On the March
    Part 1, Thoughts on @BobAvakianOfficial from a reader

    In January, Sunsara Taylor interviewed the revolutionary leader Bob Avakian (BA). In Part 2 of that interview, she asked him about what role his social media messages play in helping people to understand, and radically change, the world.

    Watch his answer:

    There are some key things that BA speaks to there that I don't think we've really appreciated. 

    BA's social media messages do speak to timely burning questions. They are working on obstacles in people's thinking that have to get quickly cleared away. Struggling with people who don't want to confront how rapidly fascism is consolidating or who don't get that fascism—no matter how it comes to power—is illegitimate. BA breaks down why the Democrats won't fight these fascists the way they need to be fought. He exposes the system of capitalism-imperialism that underlies this fascism and causes so many other horrors. He answers people who think the problem is "human nature," instead of the nature of the system of capitalism-imperialism, and how a radically different system is necessary and possible. He is waging struggle with Black people about their role and responsibility among the front ranks in the fight to defeat fascism... and I could go on and on. 

    So the content of these messages really matter—and we should make a big deal out of these when they come out. It would open up a different dynamic in society if what BA was speaking to were the questions being sharply debated by millions of people.

    But even more important than the content of each individual piece is learning from the method that BA applies—and trains others in—in all of his messages. 

    Read more

    To the revcoms, and those who want a better world:

    Einstein, Astrology and Bob Avakian
    Part 2, from a reader 

    “To evaluate Bob Avakian from the standpoint of what passes for political thought today is like trying to evaluate Einstein on the basis of astrology.”

    When I heard this from a comrade a few months ago, I thought it captured a big problem that the revcoms and all those who want a better world need to understand, and fight to change—quickly! And I want to share some thoughts on why this is so profound, and so true!

    Bob Avakian (BA) is a revolutionary leader who has developed a whole new framework for human emancipation—the new communism. 

    In her book, Science and Revolution: On the Importance of Science and the Application of Science to Society, the New Synthesis of Communism and the Leadership of Bob Avakian, the scientist Ardea Skybreak said: 

    ...this is a completely, a radically and fundamentally, different vision of how the world could and should be. It’s a completely different framework. And when we talk about how “BA is the architect of a completely different framework”—of revolution, of the revolutionary process, and of the new society to bring into being—that's exactly what he is. You can like it or not like it, agree or don't agree, but objectively that's what he actually is. And he's been developing this framework very systematically, on the basis of scientific methods. And that is why we make such a big deal about this one person, BA. There is no one else in the world today who is on the same level in terms of developing the science of revolution and its application to the struggle to transform this society and the world on a radical, a truly radical basis, that deals with fundamental problems. Nobody's taken it as far, and on such a consistently scientific basis, and has as worked out a sense of not only why it needs to be done, but how to do it, and what to bring into being to replace this system. That's why we make such a big deal about him.

    (Go here for a longer excerpt from this Interview.)

    But when BA's work is brought to most people, most of the time, the responses are way too often on the level of: "why should I look into that, he's an old white guy," or kneejerk opposition to "so much focus on one person," without any analysis into what this person is saying and what the significance of it is, or one of the most unthinking replies, "Bob Avakian is a cult leader." 

    In other words, people come back with astrology.

    Read more

    The Fight Against Fascism… Before, and After, BA: Internationalism
    From a reader

    I've been returning to and digging into the recent interviews with Bob Avakian (BA): Part 1: On Fascism, Capitalism, & the Way Out of the Madness; Part 2: The New Communism: A Whole New Way To Live, a Fundamentally Different System. As I have, I have been repeatedly struck by a point that was made in a letter from a reader on revcom.us last December:

    In the history of [communism] there is a clear “before” and an “after,” that is delineated by the emergence of the new synthesis of communism developed by BA—yes, building on the many lessons and accomplishments of the past, but, crucially, breaking with and discarding a tremendous amount of wrong thinking, wrong methods, and wrong practices, that, despite best intentions, seriously vitiated and contributed to derailing the first wave of socialist revolutions...

    What BA has developed with the new communism really is a NEW path forward for humanity that is very DIFFERENT, and MUCH BETTER than anything that the first wave of socialism/communism was even able to conceive of, let alone put into practice.

    There’s so much in these interviews that illustrate this. One thing that struck me deeply in these last couple weeks is the question of internationalism, which I want to speak to here. Internationalism is one very important element of the “before and after” spoken to above, though far from the only one.

    Read more

    The World's Most Radical Thinker On Women's Liberation is An “Old, White, Man”:  A Challenge to Put Aside Ill-Founded Prejudice and Engage Bob Avakian
    by Sunsara Taylor

    Bro culture seething with the hatred of women. Gleeful taunts of “Your body, my choice.” Fascist enforcement of patriarchal gender codes. Trump/MAGA 2.0 is moving at lightning speed. Alongside his genocidal racism, his threats against the people of the world, and the sledgehammer he is taking to any remaining democratic norms or basic rights of the people, Trump is pushing for the open enslavement of women and complete erasure of trans people.

    We Stand At A Crossroads

    Never before have so many women in so many parts of the world broken free of so many traditional chains of patriarchy. Women have fought their way into public life and into every profession. In the U.S., women outpace men in higher education. Women dominate pop culture. Growing numbers boldly reject the shame that has long attached to female sexuality, to abortion, and to being a victim of sexual assault. Meanwhile, LGBT people have become widely visible, won important basic rights and achieved growing respect and acceptance.

    Read more

    Letter from a reader
    Appreciating, Wielding and Promoting Bob Avakian's Official Biography

    ....I would like to recommend that people read, and wield, the recently updated “Bob Avakian Official Biography.” THE REVCOM CORPS For The Emancipation Of Humanity in LA has been wielding this in meetings with broader forces who need to be united in a powerful movement built with the very specific aim of defeating fascism along with the series of @BobAvakianOfficial social media messages REVOLUTION #102-111. Additionally, we have been using it with people who have come into the Revcom Corps as a way to learn about the importance of revolutionary theory and to get an introduction to the actual breakthrough in human understanding the new communism is. 

    Bob Avakian - Official Biography book cover

     

    This biography is also really an excellent introduction to the person who is the kind of leader that has never before existed in this country and whose leadership is of enormous importance for the emancipation of all humanity. It gives a history of the formative experiences that made BA who he is, the times that helped shape him and the critical junctures in the development of those times where his leadership has been decisive—from growing up in Berkeley and his early political life to becoming a communist and communist leader, to the restoration of capitalism in China and the end of the first stage of communist revolutions. It gets into how BA was and is the only thinker and leader in the world today to meet this defeat with the interrogation of that experience in a way that has qualitatively advanced the science of communism. Theory that has met the end of a wave of revolutions in a world that is tragically stymied and existentially imperiled—paving not only a path out of this but a path to a future that not only makes revolution viable again but worth fighting for. Paving the way for a new wave of truly emancipating revolutions throughout the world.  Read more

    A Letter from a Reader—To the Revcoms, and All Who Seek a Radically New World

    “A clear before and an after”: 

    What Bob Avakian (BA) has brought forward is not just another big advance in the history of our project.  In the history of our project there is a clear “before” and an “after,” that is delineated by the emergence of the new synthesis of communism developed by BA—yes, building on the many lessons and accomplishments of the past, but, crucially, breaking with and discarding a tremendous amount of wrong thinking, wrong methods, and wrong practices, that, despite best intentions, seriously vitiated and contributed to derailing the first wave of socialist revolutions. 

    We shouldn’t want to repeat any of that! We shouldn’t want even the best of the past socialist revolutions and societies, especially now that we have an even much better theoretical and practical framework to work with! What BA has developed with the new communism really is a NEW path forward for humanity that is very DIFFERENT, and MUCH BETTER than anything that the first wave of socialism/communism was even able to conceive of, let alone put into practice.

    How much do we all really understand and appreciate that? Really agree? Read more.

    Further Grappling with “A Clear Before and an After” with the New Communism Developed by Bob Avakian 

    I’ve been part of a lot of rich discussions responding to the letter from a reader posted here a couple weeks ago: “A clear before and an after.”

    That letter makes the point:

    In the history of our project [a communist world, free from all forms of exploitation and oppression, with an emancipating culture] there is a clear “before” and an “after,” that is delineated by the emergence of the new synthesis of communism developed by BA [Bob Avakian]...

    One thing I’ve kept coming back to in these discussions is what it means to say that “the new communism is a whole new framework for human emancipation.”  Or as it says in the letter, “What BA has developed with the new communism really is a NEW path forward for humanity that is very DIFFERENT, and MUCH BETTER than anything that the first wave of socialism/communism was even able to conceive of, let alone put into practice.” Read more

    What Is Most Important About Bob Avakian's Leadership?

    From a reader

    Several weeks ago, revcom.us published the following statement:

    We will never succeed in having a real revolution in this country—certainly not one really worth having and that is truly emancipating for the vast majority of people—unless and until millions of people are won to become conscious followers of Bob Avakian and the new communism he has developed as the pathway and blueprint for the emancipation of all of humanity.

    There are several important things in this crucial and true statement, but I want to start with what is the most important (and what is, at the same time, still the least understood and appreciated) part of that statement. The most important part of that statement is not merely or absolutely that there couldn't be a revolution without BA, but that any revolution that is not led by the new communism Bob Avakian has forged wouldn't lead anywhere good. Simply put: There is no road to human emancipation without Bob Avakian's new communism. There is no way to continue to understand and change the world in the fundamental interests of humanity as a whole, to overthrow and defeat the old order and build a new society and system that enables people to uproot and overcome all forms of oppression and exploitation, and do so in a way that unleashes and increasingly involves and relies on the masses of people in this process. Read more

    Why Bob Avakian Is So Important

    From a reader

    “Besides the fact that he is the only leader in this country who is talking about a real revolution—and besides the fact that he is actually leading the process of actively working for that revolution—what Bob Avakian (BA) has done, with the development of the new communism, is of world historic importance. It is, in fact, a whole new framework for human emancipationNo one else has done what BA has done. 

    In the Six Resolutions of the Central Committee of the Revolutionary Communist Party, the sixth one states that while BA is Chairman of the Party, he is “greater than” that. It goes on to say, “As we have emphasized, the leadership of BA and the new synthesis of communism that he has brought forward provides the theoretical framework, the scientific method and approach for a whole new stage of communist revolution, not just in this country but in the world as a whole. BA is not just solving tactical problems or things encountered “on the way,” but BA has actually envisioned what the new socialist society would be based on and tackled the contradictions involved in moving a socialist society toward communism—without putting a gun to people’s backs. This is the historic contradiction and because BA has solved it with the new communism, we can actually say humanity has the understanding to get to a world without exploitation and oppression, to a conscious and voluntary association of human beings solving the problems of society and engaging in debate, creative and scientific activities, enriching humanity materially, socially, intellectually and spiritually in a materialist sense. Read more

  • ARTICLE:

    Update on Trump's Global Rampage: Escalating Threats on Greenland and the Danger of Nuclear War 

    Crowd in Greenland protests Trump at the U.S. Consulate, January 17, 2026.

     

    Crowd in Greenland protests Trump at the U.S. Consulate, January 17, 2026.    Photo: AP

    Since the article last week titled “Trump’s Global Rampage, and the Method to the Madness,” Trump has continued with outrageous gangster threats around the world:

    We can no longer afford to allow these imperialists to continue to dominate the world and determine the destiny of humanityAnd it is a scientific fact that humanity does not have to live this way.
    Bob Avakian
    Tweet URL

    *The Pentagon ordered an aircraft carrier “strike group” to be deployed from the Indo-Pacific to the Middle East to add to U.S. forces there, adding to Trump’s threats against the regime in Iran.

    *Trump announced he will stop Venezuela from sending any more oil or aid to Cuba, and threatened: “THERE WILL BE NO MORE OIL OR MONEY GOING TO CUBA–ZERO! I strongly suggest they make a deal, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.”

    *Trump also doubled down on threats against Greenland. Trump reasserted that the U.S. was going to get Greenland—“We can do it the easy way, or the hard way.” On Wednesday, hours before top officials from Greenland and Denmark met with JD Vance and Marco Rubio in Washington, DC, Trump posted that Greenland should be “in the hands of the UNITED STATES… Anything less than that is unacceptable.” After the meeting, the Danish foreign minister said, “We didn’t manage to change the American position. It’s clear that the president has this wish of conquering over Greenland.” 

    The next day, France, Germany and several other NATO countries began sending small military units to Greenland, apparently intended to show that they could handle Greenland’s defense. Trump’s press secretary said that the move by the Europeans would not "impact the president's decision-making process, nor does it impact his goal of the acquisition of Greenland at all." In fact, on Friday, Trump announced new 10 percent tariffs, beginning February 1, on Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, Britain, the Netherlands and Finland until they agree to talks on the U.S. takeover of Greenland. Those tariffs would increase to 25 percent on June 1 and continue until a deal is struck. This is economic blackmail on the part of the U.S.

    On Friday, an 11-member bi-partisan congressional delegation traveled to Copenhagen and held a series of meetings with the leaders of Denmark and Greenland, offering their support amid Trump's threats. Senator Murkowski told NBC News: “The signals are clear, I think you will find that support in Congress to acquire Greenland in any way is not there.”

    It is important to note that part of Trump’s approach has been to invoke the possibility of China or Russia seizing Greenland to justify the U.S. seizing it instead. First, this is a bullshit rationale that because some other power might do something bad, then the U.S. must do that same bad thing because “it’s good for America, and we’re the good guys.”8 But even more, this reveals the increasing danger of nuclear war between these contending imperialist powers. Underneath the seeming insanity of it is the logic of imperialism—a madman’s logic, but that doesn’t mean that it’s not serious or extremely dangerous. (See last week's article, Trump’s Global Rampage, and the Method to the Madness,” for more on this.)

    An Excerpt from WE NEED AND WE DEMAND—A WHOLE NEW WAY TO LIVE, A FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT SYSTEM

    Abolishing Nuclear Weapons, Finally Abolishing War, and Systematically Addressing the Environmental Crisis

    The new socialist government will not develop or use nuclear weapons and will take concrete steps and wage determined struggle to abolish nuclear weapons everywhere, with the ultimate goal of finally abolishing wars among human beings, with the abolition of the capitalist-imperialist system, and all systems and relations of exploitation and oppression, which are the basis for wars. This new socialist government will move, quickly, systematically and effectively, to address the already acute and fast accelerating environmental crisis, with the aim of bringing into being a world where humanity can truly be fit caretakers of the earth.

    All this is not just a dream, or a wish—it is what is possible and necessary in the interests of the masses of people in this country and the great majority of humanity, and for the future of humanity as a whole.

    All this is why there is an urgent need, and we boldly dare to demand—and we call on all those who hate injustice and hunger for a society and a world where people can fully thrive and give the fullest expression to their humanity, to join in making this the demand of millions and tens of millions—a demand which can finally be made a reality through the fearless, determined struggle of those millions and tens of millions:

    The Existing Capitalist-Imperialist System And Institutions Of Government In This Country Must Be Abolished And Dismantled—And Replaced By A New, Socialist System Based On The CONSTITUTION FOR THE NEW SOCIALIST REPUBLIC IN NORTH AMERICA.

    THE REVCOMS
    (REVOLUTIONARY COMMUNISTS)

    We Need and We Demand: A Whole New Way to Live, a Fundamentally Different System

     

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. For more on this peculiar imperialist logic that is shared by both Trump and his Democratic opponents, see Bob Avakian on the “Great Tautological Fallacy.” [back]