Last week, in a front-page story headlined “Biden Takes His Battle for Democracy Case by Case,” Peter Baker of the New York Times tried to explain to his readers a troubling contradiction involved in the way that Biden “has made it his mission to wage what he momentously calls ‘the battle between democracy and autocracy.’” The question Baker sets out to answer is how this can be true when many of Biden’s most important partners in this alleged “alliance against autocracy” preside over regimes that carry out torture and murder of opponents (Saudi Arabia—which has also waged a genocidal war with U.S. weapons in Yemen—a point that goes unmentioned by Baker); brutally oppress minority nationalities and religions (India, Israel, France); or carry out widespread jailing and torture of political prisoners (Egypt—which has an estimated 65,000 political prisoners). Indeed, the list he gives stretches beyond what we just said.
Baker then meanders around for 29 paragraphs before, in typical “objective” Times style, giving the last word to a spokesperson for a ruling class “think tank,” who says that the U.S. must “stand up for [democracy] … but must balance it against other objectives.”
This prominently featured article functions to quiet the twinges of conscience of those liberals who can’t help but notice the inconsistency in this alleged war of “democracy against autocracy.” And both the complicated rendition of the ins and outs and the conclusion are meant to send a message to those readers: Go back to sleep.
In actual fact, it is not all that complicated. There is one essential criterion for the U.S. in choosing allies: will this alliance serve the extension of U.S. exploitation and domination of other countries, especially in opposition to its rivals, or not? Or, to answer the question in a single paragraph:
The essence of what exists in the U.S. is not democracy but capitalism-imperialism and political structures to enforce that capitalism-imperialism. What the U.S. spreads around the world is not democracy, but imperialism and political structures to enforce that imperialism.
—Bob Avakian, BAsics 1:3
Bob Avakian: Free Yourself from the GTF! The Great Tautological Fallacy
For a fuller exposition on the anti-scientific roots of this “democracy vs. authoritarianism” distinction, see Bob Avakian’s recent article “Anti-Scientific ‘Anti-Authoritarianism’: Serving American Imperialism and Promoting American Chauvinism”